Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Classroom management strategies research paper
Classroom management strategies research paper
The Importance of Classroom Management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Classroom management strategies research paper
What is Change? It can be defined as making something different or to modify (change, n.d.). In our modern day of technology, change has become a standard way of life. This technology has transformed or changed how information is being delivered and presented to students in our school systems. The challenge in our schools today, is the willingness of the educational leaders to implement change for the benefit of raising their overall grades and more importantly, to help learners retain the material that they are being taught. Experts in education today, recommend that schools should be willing to change how instructional material is presented based upon the needs of the students (Corcoran & Silander, 2009). In fact, as teachers monitor how their students are responding to the type of instruction, the most effective strategy is to change the process or method based upon the group’s greatest need (Corcoran & Silander, 2009). Furthermore, educators must be willing to change their instructional method in order to help the students increase their grades and attain the policy goals of the school district.
What is Instructional Change?
Instructional Change is the process by which an educator modifies his or her method in order to reach a goal of retained learning (Green, 2013). Within this process, the focus is on what is the best scenario for learning for a particular group of students. This change can be an intentional event or unplanned that may be influenced by past experience or outside recommendation (Green, 2013). Within the capacity of intentional change based upon the current situation, educational leaders go through various steps to change the outcome or behavior. The leader must assess the current situation and l...
... middle of paper ...
..., 157-183.
Common Core Fact Sheets. (n.d.). Michigan Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/FAQ_4.10.13_418299_7.pdf
Green, R.L. (2013). Practicing the Art of Leadership. A Problem-Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards. Pearson Education, Inc.
Herold, B. & Molnar, M. (2014, March). Research Questions Common-Core Claims by Publishers. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/03/05/23textbooks_ep.h33.html
Pearson Education, Inc. (2010). The Change Process. Retrieved from http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_green_practicing_2/23/6137/1571248.cw/index.html
Smith, B. (2013, June). What is Common Core? A look at the standards sparking controversy in Michigan and nationwide. MLive. Retrieved from http://www.mlive.com/education/index.ssf/2013/06/what_is_common_core_a_look_at.html
Furthermore, students should understand that change is consistent and the world will not operate the same way it did years ago. Understanding change allows one to pre...
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B., (2007). The leadership challenge, (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Working as an Instructional Technology Specialist for the past seven years has provided many opportunities to observe teachers and students in a classroom setting. During this time teachers have been in the process of phasing in a new standards-based curriculum with an emphasis on student mastery of these standards. New technology tools have also been incorporated in many classrooms including studen...
One of the objectives is to use the Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory to amend the current teaching instruction. At the end of the teaching transformation, a satisfaction survey will be used to collect feedback on the changes made. A review of the evidenced-based changes will provide a better picture of what works and what doesn’t.
Common core has been the program calling all the shots in most school systems in the United States. Since the year 2008, the common core standard testing has been sneaking its way into the school systems. The common core has brought up many different situations within the schools. One situation consists of determining the education level of students by using the same standardized test. Another situation is by requiring teachers to teach to a certain test, even though students do not fully learn what they are being taught. The government should not be able to evaluate students and teachers by one certain test. Attention must be brought up to how common core has changed our education system to the unproductive side, but then explain how our schooling systems can fix the problem that has been made. The common core can be fixed for the best, but the most fulfilling way to fix this problem is to get rid of the program altogether. The best results of students’ education can truly be viewed accurately once the common core is fully out of the school curriculum.
The common core requires higher standards, standards that are supposed to provide children with a deeper understanding of ...
The Common Core State Standards have made tremendous gains for the world of education. Students nationwide are learning the same standards and skill sets. Nationwide standards are clearly necessary, so one state isn’t far more advanced or lagging behind other states. Not only has the Common Core provided national standards, it has created rigorous standards that encourage critical thinking, and prepare students for college curriculum and careers pursued after their schooling. Before Common Core, teachers could teach anything they wanted without purpose and support. CCSS have required teachers to b...
(Common Core State Standards Initiative) Many find flaws in the system such as Valerie Strauss of the Washington Post. Strauss points out in her article Eight Problems With Common Core Standards that the standards set by the Common Core should not be limited to school subjects, but should step outside the box and tie in real world scenarios. (Strauss) Strauss also says the lack of diversity in the curriculum puts students at a disadvantage because of the changing world around teachers should not be limited to teaching information provided by an initiative that makes students from all over the nation learn the same material. (Strauss) Strauss is especially skeptical of the Common Core’s preparation for standardized test as she says, “The Common Core Standards are a set-up for national standardized tests, tests that can’t evaluate complex thought, can’t avoid cultural bias, can’t measure non-verbal learning, can’t predict anything of consequence.” (Strauss) Strauss explains how the Common Core destroys any form of originality by stating; “The word “standards” gets an approving nod from the public (and from most educators) because it means “performance that meets a standard.” However, the word also means “like everybody else,” and standardizing minds is what the Standards
In these changing times one of the biggest aspects of society that should be updated on a regular basis is education. Changes in curriculum as well as methods of teaching need to be revised each and every year. With this idea came the idea of the Common Core State Standard which is currently being adopted by forty-four out of fifty states in the United States. This new rework is designed to help better prepare students for college, universities, and the work place. However, not everyone believes this is the right move education should be taking at this moment. Those in support state this is the best decision possible to teach the children of the 21st century. Others say the cause for the decline in the quality of education in the United States stems from other sociological factors not from how the system is currently being worked. Even more are concerned if schools will be ready for this new wave of change. Will Common Core be effective in helping prepare high school graduates for the future? Only time will tell if the Common Core Standards proves effective in further helping students be prepared for the future.
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
The first step in discovering what hides behind the curtain of Common Core is judging its foundations. It its most primitive form, the ideology of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) began as the Elementary and Second Education Act in 1965, which minimally increased the amount of financial support from the federal government which would be allowed in the public school system. The next major step for this government-endorsed education arrived more controversially in 2002, and was renamed the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. The NCLB raised concerns from individuals of all sides of the political spectrum, as the act enabled even greater federal intervention in the developing of policies in local education establishments. Additionally, the NCLB mandated nationwide testing, that, while states were allowed to develop their own tests so long as they aligned with the NCLB standards, had to be reported in order to determine if any
Gardner, N. (2013). The Common Core is a change for the better. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(4), 49.
There are many studies have conducted on the Common Core issue. I am interested in reading and knowing this topic, the Common Core Standards in the American perspective. According to State Standards Initiative, the Common Core State Standards established curricula for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects “the Standards” are the peak of a prolonged effort to carry out the charge supplied by the states to build the generation of K-12 standards to help guarantee that all learners are college and occupation ready in knowledge at the end of high school. (Schutz, n.d.).
Hall, Peter, & Norris, Peter. (1993). Learning for leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 14(7), 35. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 81758).
Lussier, R.N. & Achua, C.F. (2010). Leadership: Theory, application, skill development (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.