Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of journalism in politics
Freedom of the press research paper
Press freedom opinion essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of journalism in politics
Democratization of Journalism and Corporate Media: An analytic comparative essay
Due to plummeting price and better accessibility of technologies similar to cell phones and the internet, the access to information and sharing has become cheaper and easier. The decentralized nature of these technologies has helped give rise to citizen journalism where audiences collect, analyze and disseminate news information usually primarily through the internet. Since citizen journalism is decentralized, the media content cannot be regulated. This means the content reported will not always be valid and there is always a risk of false reporting. In addition, the citizen journalists or the “pop up” news activists need the help of mega media corporations such
…show more content…
Also, the audience prefer main sources of news that report stories around the globe rather than dispersed sources of information limited to one geographic area in order to save time and hassle. This means, citizen journalists will not be able to overtake traditional news systems in terms of audience base over a prolonged period of time, preserving the imbalance in power. Both articles show that the traditional media will always be the dominant force over citizen journalism and UGC as the traditional media ultimately decides how and when UGC are used and discussed. This means there will never be mass democratization of journalism and will always be few media outlets that control the flow of information and will have an even stronger audience base compared to the citizen journalists. Anyone with power to collect and share information can be a called a citizen journalist. The decentralized nature of citizen journalism means that there is no central authority present to inspect the validity of information being reported. In the article “Syrian Citizen Journalism”, the authors state an instance …show more content…
Whether it is through a social media site such as Facebook or a traditional news media such as BBC, citizen journalists always need the help of media corporations in order to be able to share their information and views to the mass audience. According to the article “Syrian Citizen Journalism”, “Syrian citizen journalists took advantage of the built-in networking structure of social media such as YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc., all of which are key nodes in global information networks.” This quote states that the activists in Syria needed corporate platforms to be able to publish their work and gain attention from the mass audience. This works against the mass democratization of journalism because the citizen journalists must rely on the corporate media for the distribution of their content since an average citizen cannot afford the cost for the infrastructure needed to be able to distribute and broadcast their journalistic content independently. This means, the citizen journalists do not have control over how their content should be distributed, how their content should be framed and what demographic of audience the content should be targeted for. In the article “User-generated content and the news”, the authors discuss the control that the newspapers have over UGC where the newspapers have the ultimate decision on whether they want to publish the information or not
”All newspapers had small circulations and most were financed by political groups as a means to express particular opinions and criticize their opponents”(Braunwarth Chp10.2.1). While modern day the availability of news is limitless, having un biased and accurate information is limited. “In the early twentieth century many newspapers….The so-called “muckrakers” dug up stories about government corruption, which was at an all-time high in the United States. In their zeal to expose, newspapers often published stories based on faulty information”(Braunwarth Chp10.2.5). False news accompanied by slander is still a problem in modern times and the control is in the hands of political parties. The control over the media and current utilization causes harm to a democratic country, the citizens are shown false information not to educate them but rather, persuade them to vote in favor of the medias benefactor by only showing points they want observed. “the media do not so much influence what people think as what they think about.” By gatekeeping and framing, the media help determine which policies the public thinks are important” (Braunwarth Chp10.7.3). The public has an option on where they become educated to vote but many of those resources are all owned by four
Influence; it is an essential force inherent to all decisions, mindsets, and values. Sometimes influence, be it intentional or not, is easy to uncover, but other times it goes unnoticed despite the great impact it can have. Influence can come about in many forms, be interpreted in multiple fashions; it all contributes to the idea that the roots of influence are not always necessarily clear. This is increasingly the case with the effects of the Canadian media on politics as more people continue to consume additional media on additional platforms at additional convenience. Essentially, it is easier to consume media than it has ever been before. On the aggregate, the Canadian media is able to impact a larger audience while inducing additional influence on Canadian elections as a consequence of a meager regulatory board resulting in media corporations holding too much influence in Canadian elections.
Furthermore, it is evident that every journalist has a different concept of danger and what is hazardous to one person may not be considered hazardous to another. The individual desire to record human tragedy also differs from person to person (9). According to Gabe Mythen, the attraction of citizen journalist to media internet sites is that, “For technophiles, a substantial increase in peer-to-peer interactions has eroded gate-keeping hierarchies as public-based social news sites that set their own topics and agendas. Thus, one of the vaunted distinctions drawn between citizen journalism and professional journalism is that ‘no editor comes between the author and the reader” (Mythen,
Throughout history, the press has long been known for its didactic approach to educating and gaining supporters of a cause. Written by a select few, newspapers and news broadcasts have been inadvertently biased in their deliverance of current events. However, with this increasing rich pool of information coming from a network of authors, the internet has become the new portal to current events – throughout the world. Particularly, new media, such as blogging or “tweeting”, has had a shockingly profound and lasting effect on non-democratic countries around the world, setting a firm foundation for revolutions. It has introduced a world far more informational and accommodating, setting up a fundamental basis to spark revolutions around the world. New media allows a brief glimpse into democratic societies and cultures formerly unbeknownst to a people, triggering curiosity and anger strong enough to overcome even the most oppressive despot. Specifically, social networking is a powerful tool prevalently influencing peace building and influencing individuals to leverage resources such as Facebook, Tumblr, or Youtube to further prevent violence and promote peace among a nation.
In light of recent events, we have worked “to enable the media, especially those in and adjacent to the conflict zone, to provide objective coverage of events promoting peaceful dialog and conflict resolution in Ukraine” even recently inviting “independent media outlets, registered Ukrainian non-governmental organizations and independent bloggers” to participate in an open grant competition ending March 30 (Supporting Regional Media). We have also hosted a “Civil Society Digital Capacity Building Grant Competition” in which we supported projects that furthered “freedom of information through social media,” supported “the development and coordination of independent bloggers,” and fostered “the digital development and capacity building of civil society in Ukraine” ("Civil Society Digital Capacity").
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
Citizen journalism appeared by 2000 as a new trend which rose from new media technologies,
The article, Super PACs’ Spend Freely as Control of New York Senate Hangs in Balance, is about the power of Super PACs on New York Senate campaign. Money plays an important role on opening the gate for candidates to successfully win during their campaigns. The Super PACs become very active and spent a lot of money to support the candidates during the elections. The groups spend a great amount of money in the media to support their candidates. There is no limit of how much a “Super PAC” can spend to support his or her candidacy.
The article “Why Americans Hate the Media” takes a look at how the media has taken their journalistic duties to another level that does not promote the ideas and questions that the American citizens whom the journalist report to are concerned about. The media has found a way to keep their ratings and the hype of politics alive by sensationalizing hot-bed issues. In the article “Why Americans Hate the Media” written by James Fallows it states that “Perhaps the public has good reason to think that the media’s self-aggrandizement gets in the way of solving the countries real problems” (Fallows) which leads to the fact that, although the media knows that they are skipping over the American citizens view and sending their own message, but somehow
Facebook is slowly replacing the industry leading news stations like CNN, NBC and Fox News or in other words "the middleman" by directly connecting the public with the writer without the editor and publisher. Although that may have downsides most people seem to prefer it simply because it is not filtered on what a particular company wants to produce and gives less power to the major media companies that tend to sway people in a particular direction. To come up with a solution to the downside of Facebook comes many great ideas like creating an algorithm to spot unreliable news articles, or create a community that identifies misinformation for the benefit of everyone else, or creating a human team of journalist and policymakers that judges whether an article is factual. Although these theories have potential to be successful it is ultimately up to the viewer of the article to determine whether or not they want to research and confirm the information on the topic presented to them. Social media platforms have changed the way modern America perceives news forever with preferences to each profile and the ability to explore other types of information by entering a few keywords in a search bar is a method only a couple decades old and we should try to prevent from limiting this type of
Media is therefore bad for democracy. Stated throughout this paper is the level of bias that is displayed in media. This level of bias sways the public far right or far left. Their decisions are based on one side of a political point of view. They are repeatedly fed with misguided information that eventually make they choose based on the information they receive. The media tends to hide the truth and to pick and choose what they really want you to hear not necessarily what you need to hear. Its stated that media is filled with bias information but is ignored to suit those of higher power. Therefore media is bad for democracy and is misguiding those who it reaches to.
The main aim of this report is to analyze the impacts of changes in the media concerning the societal and individual view of politics and politicians. The report also describes significant milestones in mass media since the year 1960 and examines the impact of mass media on how people think politically. The report then considers the effect of technological advancements in mass media and the effect on the results of elections. The use of mass media has increased over the last fifty years in that it is a primary medium through which supporters of various campaigners share their ideas and views concerning politicians and different political parties. Through social media, behaviors and performance of several activists have brought
... small media reforms (like public journalism) will be enough to reduce the commercial and corporate imperatives driving our existing media systems (Hackett and Zhao, 1998, p. 235). Instead, a fundamental reform of the entire system is needed, together with a wider institutional reform of the very structures the media systems work within, our democracies. This will be a difficult task, due to powerful vested interests benefiting from the status quo, including media, political and economic elites. Reforms will need to be driven by campaigns mobilising public support across the political spectrum, to enable the citizens of the world to have a media system that works to strengthen democratic principles as opposed to undermining them. This task is challenging, but it will become easier once people begin to understand the media’s role in policymaking within our democracies.
"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one." This quote by A.J. Liebling illustrates the reality of where the media stands in today's society. Over the past twenty years there has been an increase in power throughout the media with regard to politics. The media's original purpose was to inform the public of the relevant events that occurred around the world. The job of the media is to search out the truth and relay that news to the people. The media has the power to inform the people but often times the stories given to the public are distorted for one reason or another. Using slant and sensationalism, the media has begun to shape our views in society and the process by which we choose our leaders. There was once a time when the government used the media as a medium to influence voters, committees, communities etc. Recently, it has been the presidents of major media outlets that have not only exercised power over the public but also made their presences felt in government and in the halls of congress. When the word democracy is thrown about it usually has to do with the rights or original intentions for a group or organization. The first group intended to be influenced by the media was the informed voter. Political parties along with the government used a variety of media resources to persuade the voter or in effect receive a vote for their cause. Returning to the thought of ?democracy? the question is, what was the original intention of the media with relation to the theme of democracy and the informed voter? To analyze this thought thoroughly one must first grasp an understanding of the basic definition of democracy.
In trying to attract new audiences, news media have begun to transition from reporting to becoming a form of entertainment. With the meteoric rise of social media’s role as a news source, the fight for an increase of diversity in the media, and the ever-growing desire of immediate content, the future of responsible journalism is more important than ever. Ask yourself, why do I think the way I do? Where do my political views originate? How do I prove them? Most likely, it is due to the biased portrayal of issues in the media and the politicization that accompanies what we consume. Now, compare your views to your preferred news reporting entity. More than likely, they are the same.