In the medical dictionary, death with dignity is defined as “the philosophical concept that a terminally ill client should be allowed to die naturally and comfortably, rather than experience a comatose, vegetative life prolonged by mechanical support systems” (Elsevier). Then we must ask ourselves; why is this death with dignity such a philosophical idea? Why must a person’s right to their own life be haltered and prohibited by the law?
In most cases, the right of a dignified death with the help of a physician is prohibited due to religious beliefs and ideologies that are used as an opposition. Even with heated debates on the ethics of the Death With Dignity Act (DWDA), only three states (Oregon, Washington, and Vermont) have legalized this right, the right to have a patients last moments theirs to decide.
One prime example of a case in which death with dignity started with a terminally ill patient named Brittany Maynard. In 2014, Maynard, a 29-year-old teacher from Alamo, California, was diagnosed with severe terminal brain cancer. Knowing there was nothing but pain and suffering lying ahead, Maynard looked at her options and decided to move with her family to Portland, Oregon, where death with dignity was available.
Brittany Maynard wasn’t about to make a choice without giving up the fight. Before her decision to end her life she sought out Compassion & Choices, a DWDA support and advocacy support group, and with their help Maynard began to leave her mark on the world.
In her advocacy campaign, Maynard made YouTube videos that reached 13 million views in a matter of days. Saying in her videos, “I decided to share my story, and that wasn’t an easy choice to make but I decided to share it because...
... middle of paper ...
... pain and suffering, then we as the people of Ohio and the United States must remember duress patients like Brittany Maynard and what thousands of others go through.
We must never forget the legacies and the history of those who showed the world that everyone deserves the right to choose their own paths, to so what they know is right, and the choice to make their own decisions. If our country is ruled on the principals of freedom, then these freedoms should include the freedom of physicians to end the suffering of their patients, and patients who have terminal illnesses to seek a comfortable death surrounded by those they love.
Always remember that the Death With Dignity Act is a choice to end suffer, never a forced death, and as Thomas Jefferson once said- Everyone has “certain unalienable rights, and among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Everyone has a Right to Die In the medical dictionary, death with dignity is defined as “the philosophical concept that a terminally ill client should be allowed to die naturally and comfortably, rather than experience a comatose, vegetative life prolonged by mechanical support systems” (Elsevier). Then we must ask ourselves; why is this death with dignity such a philosophical idea. Why must a person’s right to their own life be haltered and prohibited by the law. In most cases, the right of a dignified death with the help of a physician is prohibited due to religious beliefs and ideologies that are used as an opposition.... [tags: Patient, Health care provider, Suicide]
1370 words (3.9 pages)
- The Death With Dignity Act and Physician Assisted Suicide Introduction According to the American Medical Association (1996), physician-assisted suicide (PAS) occurs when a physician facilitates a patient’s death by providing either the means or the information necessary to aid in the patient performing the life-ending act. PAS has had a long and controversial history dating back to the ancient Greeks and Romans. They believed that there was no reason to prolong life if continued pain and suffering was the only prognosis.... [tags: DWDA, Euthanasia]
1306 words (3.7 pages)
- Last Call Oftentimes when one hears the term Physician Assisted Suicide (hereafter PAS) the words cruel and unethical come to mind. On October 27, 1997 Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act, this act would allow terminally ill Oregon residents to end their lives through a voluntary self-administered dose of lethal medications that are prescribed by a physician (Death with Dignity Act) . This has become a vital, medical and social movement. Having a choice should mean that a terminally ill patient is entitled to the choice to pursue PAS.... [tags: Suffering, Suicide, Death]
1734 words (5 pages)
- America is a champion of the freedom of choice. Citizens have the right to choose their religion, their political affiliation, and make personal decisions about nearly every facet of their daily lives. Despite all of these opportunities, one choice society commonly ignores is that of deciding how one’s life will end. Death seems like a highly unpredictable, uncontrollable occurrence, but for the past 17 years, citizens of Oregon have had one additional option not offered to most Americans in the deciding of their end-of-life treatment.... [tags: Assisted Suicide]
1287 words (3.7 pages)
- In 1972 the United States Senate held the first National Hearing on Death with Dignity. The outcome of the hearing “Death with Dignity: An Inquiry into Related Public Issues” was an overwhelming annoyance caused by the use of the term, “medical miracle”. They felt as though it was ironic, the process of dying was only delayed and extended by a medical miracle and takes away from the quality of their life (Dowbiggin, 2003). Because of the present annoyance about using “medical miracles” as an excuse to ignore the idea of Death with Dignity, not much was accomplished at this hearing, besides arguing about a simple phrase.... [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Oregon]
1978 words (5.7 pages)
- In the United States, the state of Oregon is the only state government that attempted to address the issues associated with physician assisted suicide. , During 1994, Oregonian’s voted to make physician-assisted suicide a legal option for the terminally ill. In light of the Supreme Court’s ban on physician-assisted suicide, one may wonder how Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act (DWDA) remains on the books and in force. Unfortunately, DWDA’s affirmative vote in 1994 was stalled that same year by a legal injunction, an order by the court preventing physician-assisted suicide from taking place, until the legal debate was resolved.... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Suicide, Homicide]
2462 words (7 pages)
- The other reason why people are opposed to the Death with Dignity Act is they do not understand why the patients would want to have the procedure done, after all it is killing yourself. the people who have requested the prescription have all had similar concerns which include: " the financial impact of the illness, loss of autonomy, decreasing ability to participate in activities that make life enjoyable, being a burden, loss of control of bodily functions, and uncontrollable pain." (Dividion). what makes life living can be debated but most people agree that their family and hobbies make it worthwhile.... [tags: Suffering, Death, Illness, Terminal illness]
1439 words (4.1 pages)
- Jarica Otten Dr. Wright PHIL-2050-002 1 December 2015 Death with Dignity Case Study The Death with Dignity Act was passed in Oregon in 1994, and it is another option for dying with those who have terminal diseases. These people that want to die with dignity have to be seen by at least two doctors and have six or less months to live. While making the decision to use this act, the patient must be in a safe mental state to be making this decision. Currently, Oregon, Washington, Vermont, and soon to be California are the only states to carry the Death with Dignity Act.... [tags: Death, Suicide, Euthanasia, Immanuel Kant]
1452 words (4.1 pages)
- When patients suffering from serious health conditions are towards the end of their lives, they are given an option that can change their lives and the lives of those around them. This option is praised as an act of preserving dignity, but also condemned as an act of weakness. The terminally ill, as well as the disabled and the elderly, are given the choice to end their lives by the method of suicide involving the assistance of a physician. For several years, this method has been under debate on whether this option is ethical or unethical.... [tags: Suicide, Suicide methods, Physician, Death]
1288 words (3.7 pages)
- When faced with a terminal illness a person has to go through a process of thinking. What will happen to me. How long will I suffer. What kind of financial burden am I going to leave with my family when I am gone. What are my options. For many years the only legal options were to try a treatment plan, palliative care, hospice, and eventually death. For residents of Washington State, Oregon, and Vermont there is another option. They have the option to end their own life with a prescription from their physicians.... [tags: Death, Voluntary euthanasia, Terminal illness]
1181 words (3.4 pages)