Before Hume can begin to explain what morality is, he lays down a foundation of logic to build on by clarifying what he thinks the mind is. Hume states that the facts the mind sees are just the perceptions we have of things around us, such as color, sound, and heat (Hume, 215). These perceptions can be divided into the two categories of ideas and impressions (215). Both of these categories rely on reason to identify and explain what is observed and inferred. However, neither one of these sufficiently explains morality, for to Hume, morals “. . .excite passions, and produce or prevent actions” (216)....
... middle of paper ...
...ouple of spots in his argument may be hazy, you are able to make a logical leap from statement to statement, in my opinion. His argument should also convince anyone else with a remotely open mind about where morality really comes from.
Angeles, Peter A. “Ethics, is/ought dichotomy in.” The HarperCollins Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd ed. New York: HarperPerennial. 1992. 95. Print.
Hume, David. “A Treatise of Human Nature. Excerpts from Book III. Part I. Sect. I-II.” Morality and the Good Life: An Introduction to Ethics through the Classical Sources. 5th ed. Eds. Robert C. Solomon, Clancy W. Martin, and Wayne Vaught. Boston: McGraw- Hill, 2009. 215-220. Print.
Hume, David. “Moral Distinctions Not Derived from Reason” Excerpts from Book III. Part I. Sections I-II. A Treatise on Human Nature. Public domain: Project Gutenberg, 1739. PDF file.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In this paper I will defend David Hume’s Moral Sense Theory, which states that like sight and hearing, morals are a perceptive sense derived from our emotional responses. Since morals are derived from our emotional responses rather than reason, morals are not objective. Moreover, the emotional basis of morality is empirically proven in recent studies in psychology, areas in the brain associated with emotion are the most active while making a moral judgment. My argument will be in two parts, first that morals are response-dependent, meaning that while reason is still a contributing factor to our moral judgments, they are produced primarily by our emotional responses, and finally that each ind... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
2350 words (6.7 pages)
- David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher and historian. Hume carried the empiricism of John Locke and George Berkeley to the logical extreme of radical skepticism. He repudiated the possibility of certain knowledge, finding in the mind nothing but a series of sensations, and held that cause-and-effect in the natural world derives solely from the conjunction of two impressions.... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
1198 words (3.4 pages)
- ... That being said, Hume can be seen to be taking the position that morals are in fact produced primarily by our emotional responses, which leads him to the conclusion that each individual has a moral sense or in Hume’s terms, a sentiment, passion, or feeling, which guides his or her morality. Furthermore, while Hume does not completely disregard reason by maintaining that, from a rationalist point of view, reason is needed to discover the facts of any substantial situation and the general social impact of a character trait or a practice over time, he upholds that reason alone is insufficient to yield a judgment that something is virtuous or vicious.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Philosophy, Immanuel Kant]
1486 words (4.2 pages)
- Empiricists are philosophers who argue that knowledge comes from sensory experience. This means that whatever we experience through our senses are the only ideas that can be epistemically justified. John Locke, David Hume, and George Berkley are three of the most influential empiricists in modern philosophical history. Though sharing the same premise about knowledge stemming from sensory experience and having some common ground in certain areas, each philosopher had different views on what we can and cannot know through empirical evidence about the universe.... [tags: state, justification, sensory experience]
2175 words (6.2 pages)
- Free Will and the Concept of a Person The subject of free will being an actual choice, or being pre-destined has thoroughly been reflected in the minds of philosophers, especially for the purpose of people’s logic. I will argue that both David Hume’s and Harry Frankfurt’s articles on the discussion of free will are cogent, because of compatibilism, in which a human has the ability to have correlation between free will and determinism, as well as, Hume would agree Frankfurt’s concept of second-order violations.... [tags: Free will, Determinism, Causality, David Hume]
1220 words (3.5 pages)
- David Hume’s “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion” shields suicide while Emile Durkheim’s “Suicide and Modernity” unearths the causes. Durkheim and Hume label suicide differently because their perspectives varied from the moral structures in their positions. Their causative ideas of suicide are just as dissimilar as their definitions. One of the motives tied to suicide is morality; a topic that has powers vested in the justification and deconstruction of the act. Not only is morality a central subtopic, agency under Durkheim and Hume holds a strong position that affects the way suicide works.... [tags: David Hume, Emile Durkheim, Suicide]
1486 words (4.2 pages)
- Judgments of the heart between good and evil, right and wrong that is moralities purest form. Morality is a misleading mistress because, whatever is decided as moral and immoral can be just as easily justified as the opposite in a new era. Many with a rationalist view will describe morality as a virtue which allows for laws and justice to take place. An immoral action is an action taken through the perpetrator believing they will receive no punishment. A question is then presented why are there such distinct classifications of morality and immorality.... [tags: good and evil, philosophy, plato]
1357 words (3.9 pages)
- Critique of Hume's Analysis of Causality Hume's analyses of human apprehension and of causality were the most penetrating up to his time and continue to have great influence. Contemporary Spanish philosopher Xavier Zubiri (1893-1983) has examined both and identified three underlying errors: (1) the failure to recognize that there are three stages of human intellection, and especially that the first, primordial apprehension, has quite unique characteristics; (2) the attempt to place an excessive burden on the content of impressions while ignoring what Zubiri terms their 'formality of reality'; and (3) the failure to recognize that functionality, not causality, is the basis for most of our kn... [tags: Philosophy Papers]
3300 words (9.4 pages)
- Throughout history, beauty has been seen as a value to humans. Beauty practices start as far back as foot binding and continues up to today with cosmetic surgeries such as liposuction. On every billboard, magazine, and commercial citizens are reminded that they are not as physically attractive as they could be and there is a solutions to their problem. In his analysis of beauty, Kant states that beauty is morality. Despite the fact physical beauty is highly valued in society, it is not the driving factor when it comes to determining morality and making ethical judgments.... [tags: Kant, cosmetic surgeries]
1389 words (4 pages)
- The empirical nature of science has allowed for its success in solving great human problems and in understanding the world around us. Real life data and observations lead to such findings, which only then can be translated into theory. A theory without data is merely a hypothesis waiting to be shown true through observation. If you start with a theory and then try to prove it, you are taking a biased position and setting out to complete an impossible task. Nothing can be proven in science, only accepted until shown otherwise.... [tags: Ethics]
1069 words (3.1 pages)