Hume's View

739 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: David hume ethical theory

In this essay I am going to evaluate Hume’s view of the origin of moral judgements based on his sympathy principle. I argue that Hume’s account, in some cases, is not sufficient for explaining the origin of moral judgements, especially the shaping of impartial moral judgements. First, I will give an introduction to Hume’s idea of ‘sympathy’ and explain how it forms the basis of our moral approval or disapproval of certain character traits and qualities of mind. Second, I will discuss the role of ‘judicious spectator’ in forming an impartial moral judgement. Then, I shall proceed to the discussion on questions and objections regarding the sympathy principle and the judicious spectator with possible replies from Hume’s point of view. Finally I will attempt to defend my argument by stressing some further problems that Hume does not give an answer in his Treatise. I start with analysing the mechanism of sympathy. Hume’s notion of ‘sympathy’ is rather different with the word ‘sympathy’ we are using today. Its meaning is more similar to the word ‘empathy’. When we witness and perceive the emotions or feelings of other people, we form an idea in our minds of their emotions. This idea naturally induces us to resonate and go along with their emotions, and generate a ‘fellow-feeling’ in our minds. For instance, when I see a smile on my friend’s face, I infer that she is happy and I have a tendency to become happy as well. Note that, through sympathy, the sentiments we generate do not necessarily have to be exactly the same as the sentiments that the person we are observing. Usually, they are of a weaker degree and are a harmonised version, in the sense that the emotions we generated are consistent with the original ones. Negative passions ... ... middle of paper ... ...lacks enough food wants to save them, and steals some food from another neighbour Y who just has a tiny bit more than them. The consequence is the poor family is saved by X, but the other neighbour Y who got stolen is now in danger of starvation. Shall we say X has the virtue of benevolence because he saved the poor family? Or shall we say he is not benevolent because he stole food from Y and let Y in danger of starvation? If we apply the sympathy principle, we would find ourselves unable to set our moral judgements. On the one hand, we would sympathise with the poor family, a pleasure would arise in our minds. On the other hand, we would also sympathise with the neighbour Y, and in turn, a pain or uneasiness would arise. Hume does not give any guideline for weighing the effects, or the reflections of impressions, when they are in conflict, aroused by our sympathies.

Show More
Related

  • Utilitarianism and Morality in John Stuart Mill´s Essay

    1012 Words  | 3 Pages

    From top to bottom, John Stuart Mill put forth an incredible essay depicting the various unknown complexities of morality. He has a remarkable understanding and appreciation of utilitarianism and throughout the essay the audience can grasp a clearer understanding of morality. Morality, itself, may never be totally defined, but despite the struggle and lack of definition it still has meaning. Moral instinct comes differently to everyone making it incredibly difficult to discover a basis of morality. Society may never effectively establish the basis, but Mill’s essay provides people with a good idea.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of David Hume And Kant On Morality

    1093 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume claims that to make a moral judgment; one must keep in mind all the relevant aspects the situation, and recognize all the related ideas concerning the situation. This means that we must take into consideration reason. Nevertheless, The moral judgment itself is not possible without passions or sentiment, which ultimately takes in all the deliverances of reason and creates the sentiment of disapproval or approval.

    Read More

  • Reason Vs Hume Essay

    814 Words  | 2 Pages

    Whilst discussing the basics of moral philosophy, every philosopher will undoubtedly come across the works of Immanuel Kant and David Hume. As they progress into the thoughts of these two famous philosophers they will notice the stark contrast between the pair. Quite simply put, Kant’s works emphasizes that reason is the main source of human being’s morality, while Hume’s work depicts human desire as the driving source of morality. Obviously these two points of view are very different, but it is difficult to say which of these philosophers are more correct than the other.

    Read More

  • David Hume: Compatibilism And Hume

    1937 Words  | 4 Pages

    Megan Darnley PHIL-283 May 5, 2014 Compatibilism and Hume. The choices an individual makes are often believed to be by their own doing; there is nothing forcing one action to be done in lieu of another, and the responsibility of one’s actions is on him alone. This idea of Free Will, supported by libertarians and is the belief one is entirely responsible for their own actions, is challenged by necessity, otherwise known as determinism. Those championing determinism argue every action and event is because of some prior cause.

    Read More

  • Hume's Ideas on Cause and Effect

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cause and effect is a tool used to link happenings together and create some sort of explanation. Hume lists the “three principles of connexion among ideas” to show the different ways ideas can be associated with one another (14). The principles are resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect. The focus of much of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding falls upon the third listed principle. In Section I, Hume emphasizes the need to uncover the truths about the human mind, even though the process may be strenuous and fatiguing. While the principle of cause and effect is something utilized so often, Hume claims that what we conclude through this process cannot be attributed to reason or understanding and instead must be attributed to custom of habit.

    Read More

  • The Moral Permissibility of Lying

    3186 Words  | 7 Pages

    The question of what constitutes morality is often asked by philosophers. One might wonder why morality is so important, or why many of us trouble ourselves over determining which actions are moral actions. Mill has given an account of the driving force behind our questionings of morality. He calls this driving force “Conscience,” and from this “mass of feeling which must be broken through in order to do what violates our standard of right,” we have derived our concept of morality (Mill 496). Some people may practice moral thought more often than others, and some people may give no thought to morality at all. However, morality is nevertheless a possibility of human nature, and a very important one. We each have our standards of right and wrong, and through the reasoning of individuals, these standards have helped to govern and shape human interactions to what it is today. No other beings except “rational beings,” as Kant calls us, are able to support this higher capability of reason; therefore, it is important for us to consider cases in which this capability is threatened. Such a case is lying. At first, it seems that lying should not be morally permissible, but the moral theories of Kant and Mill have answered both yes and no on this issue. Furthermore, it is difficult to decide which moral theory provides a better approach to this issue. In this paper, we will first walk through the principles of each moral theory, and then we will consider an example that will explore the strengths and weaknesses of each theory.

    Read More

  • David Hume's Argument on Passion and Morality

    1149 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before Hume can begin to explain what morality is, he lays down a foundation of logic to build on by clarifying what he thinks the mind is. Hume states that the facts the mind sees are just the perceptions we have of things around us, such as color, sound, and heat (Hume, 215). These perceptions can be divided into the two categories of ideas and impressions (215). Both of these categories rely on reason to identify and explain what is observed and inferred. However, neither one of these sufficiently explains morality, for to Hume, morals “. . .excite passions, and produce or prevent actions” (216)....

    Read More

  • Hume Empiricism

    817 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this essay I will discuss the following metaphors or ideas: Descartes’ “thinking thing” and Hume’s “empiricism”. I will outline the similarities and differences between these two metaphors concerning what each implies about the meaning of being human. I will also explain which of them is more relevant as a means to gain insight into my own life and/or local and contemporary life in general.

    Read More

  • A Defense of David Hume's Moral Sense Theory

    2350 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this paper I will defend David Hume’s Moral Sense Theory, which states that like sight and hearing, morals are a perceptive sense derived from our emotional responses. Since morals are derived from our emotional responses rather than reason, morals are not objective. Moreover, the emotional basis of morality is empirically proven in recent studies in psychology, areas in the brain associated with emotion are the most active while making a moral judgment. My argument will be in two parts, first that morals are response-dependent, meaning that while reason is still a contributing factor to our moral judgments, they are produced primarily by our emotional responses, and finally that each individual has a moral sense.

    Read More

  • James Mill And John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

    1574 Words  | 4 Pages

    Mill writes that thinkers are still arguing the foundation of morality and constantly squabbling over the definition of right and wrong. He tells the reader that Plato wrote that Socrates first postulated the idea of Utilitarianism in his writings against the Sophists (Mill 1). He says man must test what is right and wrong seemingly against his own instinct, and that instinct can only give general principles of moral judgment (Mill 2). He writes that the intuitive and deductive schools taught that there is a science of morals but did not have a first principle. Rather they relied only on second principles to guide moral action. Mill writes that utilitarian arguments are indispensable for moralists and that the greatest happiness principle has influenced even those who vocally reject it (Mill

    Read More

  • Empathy As An Effective Service Leader: The Competence Of Service Leadership

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    Misusing the empathy into sympathy will not help become an effective service leadership as it cannot find the exact needs of the others. Some people may use sympathy as empathy as they do not truly understand the meaning of empathy and sympathy. The difference between empathy and sympathy is that, empathy is a process to input effort to attempt to “comprehend another’s experience”, while sympathy is a “direct perceptual awareness of another person’s experience” (Decety & Chaminade, 2003, p.127). For personal experience, one time, a friend felt hungry, the possible solution was suggested to buy a food to eat, however, the problem that lead to hunger was lack of money. In this case, the need is not the food but money. Sympathy can only see other’s situation or circumstance apparently, but cannot feel what exactly the person needs and recognize the difficulties of the situation. As a result, a satisfying support of care may not be provided as a low level of empathy is adopted, which is

    Read More

  • David Hume's Of the Standard of Taste

    1347 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this essay Hume creates the true judges who are required to have: delicacy of taste, practice in a specific art of taste, be free from prejudice in their determinations, and good sense to guide their judgments. In Hume’s view the judges allow for reasonable critiques of objects. Hume also pointed out that taste is not merely an opinion but has some physical quality which can be proved. So taste is not a sentiment but a determination. What was inconsistent in the triad of commonly held belief was that all taste is equal and so Hume replaced the faulty assumption with the true judges who can guide society’s sentiments.

    Read More

  • David Hume on Sentiments and Reason

    1553 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Appendix I., Concerning Moral Sentiment, David Hume looks to find a place in morality for reason, and sentiment. Through, five principles he ultimately concludes that reason has no place within the concept of morality, but rather is something that can only assist sentiment in matters concerning morality. And while reason can be true or false, those truths or falsities apply to facts, not to morality. He then argues morals are the direct result of sentiment, or the inner feeling within a human being. These sentiments are what intrinsically drive and thus create morality within a being. Sentiments such as beauty, revenge, pleasure, pain, create moral motivation, and action, and are immune to falsity and truth. They are the foundation for which morals are built, and exist themselves apart from any reasoning. Thesis: In moral motivation, the role of sentiment is to drive an intrinsically instilled presence within us to examine what we would deem a moral act or an immoral act, and act accordingly, and accurately upon the sentiments that apply. These sentiments may be assisted by reasons, but the reason alone does not drive us to do what we would feel necessary. They can only guide us towards the final result of moral motivation which (by now it’s painfully clear) is sentiment.

    Read More

  • David Hume's Distinction Between Natural and Artificial Virtues

    1049 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume believes that we cannot rely on everyone doing what is his or her own best self-interest. Therefore, artificial values are put into place to keep the system from collapsing. This in turn puts a cooperative scheme in society. This leads to the Hume’s assumption that fairness is an artificial virtue. He is sometimes also presented as a contractarian; in a more specific sense, a proto-utilitarian. According to which, he judges an action based on whether the action makes you happy or sad.

    Read More

  • David Hume's Theory of Knowledge

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    Empiricism (en- peiran; to try something for yourself): The doctrine that all knowledge must come through the senses; there are no innate ideas born within us that only require to be remembered (ie, Plato). All knowledge is reducible to sensation, that is, our concepts are only sense images. In short, there is no knowledge other than that obtained by sense observation.

    Read More

More about Hume's View

Open Document