Crime And Attachment Theory

867 Words2 Pages

Attachment theory is described as a strong and emotional relationship that is built with one individual becoming a critical development in someone’s life span. If an adult-child attachment becomes separated according to “The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology”, the child is more likely to grow up with many negative consequences because lack of ability to show emotion or concern for others (Anonymous, 2012). On the contrary, growing up without positive leadership or personal attachment can cause an individual to lose a sense of connection with others causing them to act out and seeking negative attention leading to violence. It has been suggested that boys disproportionately experienced disrupted attachment and that these disruptions are causally …show more content…

Crime is defined by those in power- People in power shape the criminal law with their values without an objective understanding for right and wrong. Not only are acts labeled, but also people- Labels define a person without even meeting them. A person defined as smart or intelligent are more likely to succeed and stay above the law. In contrast, negative labeling can stigmatize a person into reincarnating the name given, resulting in criminal acts and major long-term consequences. Subject interpretation of behavior involves both positive and negative labels- Negative consequences are labeled only when do the labeling. The act itself can have a negative label but the contributor can be excused of the crime. For instance, a person can kill someone, but not be labeled as a murder due to an individual in take on the crime. The consequences of labeling can unfold a tale of actions, shutting out the individual will result to criminal offenses due to the feeling of detachment as well as, isolation. A label; rumor or suspicion can leave a permanent print on someone’s life. The individual will want to live up to the label depending on the severity and notice of the name. Primary deviance is, crimes or acts that are not recorded or labeled as crimes. Simply, an act within the norm and …show more content…

Communities feel as if the justice system failed to include “we the people” in correcting crime and wrong doings. This is considered a concept of peacemaking criminology due to the approach of crime prevention and nonviolent approach. The peacemaking perspective views punishment and control as a crime encouragement instead of crime discouragement. Both Restorative justice and peacemaking promote peaceful and innovative approach to crime control without the need of force and gun

Open Document