Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical decision making and moral judgments
The importance of ethical decision making and moral judgments
Ethical decision making and moral judgments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical decision making and moral judgments
Canada: a nation built, politically, on the rights accompanied by being a democratic state. A democracy, in the simplest of terms, states that a society has the right to vote in laws, political leaders and bring other social justice issues up to the head of their political hierarchy. To suggest that a society should not have any right to enforce its moral convictions through the law would be morally unsound in a country that prides itself on equality and democracy. In this essay I will be arguing against the idea stated above: the notion that a community should not be able to have their laws reflected in the value and morals of their people. To support this opinion, I will be drawing points from Wil Waluchow’s The Concept of a Moral Position & The Legal Enforcement of Morality and Geoff Callaghan’s Devlin Power Point, as well as ideas based of off Devlin’s “Morals and the Criminal Law” and Dworkin’s “Liberty and Moralism”. I will first be looking at Devlin’s view of the Harm Principal, which states that as long as no one is being intentionally and/or directly hurt, the people of a society should be free to do whatever he or she wishes, without fearing the legal and societal consequences (Callaghan, 2014). If a society deems an act morally sounds, based on their own personal prejudices, the same people in that society should be able to act upon the societies idea of what is morally good. Next I will focus on the Disintegration Thesis, which very plainly states that without a common sense of a morality and values, a community would ultimately disintegrate (Callaghan, 2014). Finally I will take an opposing side, and in doing so rebuttal Devlin’s points by using Dworkin and Harts’s analyses, which is based on the idea that ones mora...
... middle of paper ...
...gatherers. Because of theses same morals, every community should have the right to enforce their moral convictions through law.
Work Cited
Callaghan, G. (2014) Devlin Power Point
Demographic of Texas. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Texas
Demographic of Toronto. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Toronto
Devlin, P. (1965). Morals and the Criminal Law
In Dyzenhaus D., Moreau S.R. & Ripstein A., (Eds.), Law and Morality (369-392). Toronto: University Of Toronto Press
Dworkin, R. (1977). Liberty and Moralism
In Dyzenhaus D., Moreau S.R. & Ripstein A., (Eds.), Law and Morality (393-401). Toronto: University Of Toronto Press
Waluchow, W. (2014) The Concept of a Moral Position & The Legal Enforcement of Morality
Principles of Morality. Seattle: Ponster Printing, pp. 89-92. 2010. Print. The. Gevinson, Matilda.
Kant, Immanuel, and Mary J. Gregor. The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. Print.
Nye, Howard. PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Lecture Notes – Ethics. University of Alberta.
J. L. Mackie (1982) Morality and the retributive emotions, Criminal Justice Ethics, 1:1, 3-10, DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.1982.9991689
Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. "7,8,9,10." In The elements of moral philosophy. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. 97-145.
Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. H. J. Paton. 1964. Reprint. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 2009.
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
Raz, Joseph, 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Canada is viewed as being a very safe and stable place to live because people are lucky enough to have healthcare, benefits for unemployment and family needs, as well as maternity leave. Crime is something that Canadians don’t often think about because people feel as though they are out of harm's way. As Canadians, we’ve watched the world experience different threats and crime, and we’ve seen the world fight back. For example, our neighbors in North America, the United States, have gone through terrorist attacks and issues with guns and violence. Just because we are witnessing these things in other places doesn’t mean that we aren’t at risk as well, and Canada does have certain approaches and regards in place if we are ever in danger. What I wish to address in this paper is how Canada is set up for reacting to crime and jeopardy, as well as an example of where we went wrong in our past. Methods in response to crime, Canada’s legal regime and the issue of Residential schooling for Aboriginals a hundred years ago will be presented.
This theory looks at how the sovereign and its officials created the law based on social norms and the institutions (Hart, 1958). However, hard cases such as this makes for bad law, which test the validity of the law at hand based on what the objective of the law was in the first place. The law should not be so easily dismissed just because it does not achieve justice in the most morally sound manner (Hart, 1958). Bentham and Austin understood that there are two errors in the way law is understood, what the law is and what the law should be (Hart, 1958). He knew that if law was to become what humans perceived the law ought to be, the law itself would be lost, but he also recognized that if the opposite was to occur where the law replaced morality, than any man would escape liability and there would be no retribution (Hart, 1958). This theory looks at the point of view of the dissenting judge, Justice Gray, which is that the law is what it is, even if it may conflict with morals. Austin stated that “The existence of law is one thing; its merit and demerit another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry (Hart, 1958).” This case presents the same conflict that Bentham and Austin addressed, that the law based on the statute of the
In every society around the world, the law affects everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities. Within the legal system, there is the Canadian criminal justice system, which is meant to guarantee the safety of citizens within the country and is used to sustain social control and deliver justice for a society.
The. The Basis of Morality. London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1915. Web. The Web.
Arthur, John, and Scalet, Steven, eds. Morality and Moral Controversies: Readings in Moral, Social, and Political Philosophy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Eighth Edition, 2009.
Pettit, Philip. “Consequentialism.” A Companion to Ethics. Ed. Peter Singer. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1991. 230-240. Print.
Harman, G. (2000). Is there a single true morality?. Explaining value and other essays in moral philosophy (pp. 77-99). Oxford: Clarendon Press ;.