preview

The Canadian Criminal Justice System

explanatory Essay
1961 words
1961 words
bookmark

In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.
Within the legal system, there is the Canadian criminal justice system, which is meant to guarantee the safety of citizens within the country and is used to sustain social control and deliver justice for a society. The criminal justice system is made up of many components that are constructed to ensure justice for victims of crimes along with criminals. It is designed to guarantee that punishing those who are guilty will protect the innocent. Within the criminal justice system, there is a document that consists of all the jurisdictions of criminal law. This document is called the criminal code and entitles the offences that are acknowledged in the jurisdiction along with consequences that are enforced for these crimes. Throughout the years, there are offences constantly being added to the Criminal Code of Canada and many proposals being made by the Law Reform Commission of Canada.
In the year 1970, the Canadian government founded the Law Reform Commission of Canada to ensure the progression of law making and to make recommendations for legal changes . The Law Reform Commission of Canada is constantly importing and suggesting proposals towards the criminal code of Canada. During the year of 1985, t...

... middle of paper ...

...ty. It is available to reflect the social values of a society such as new concepts of justice. The law Reform Commission of Canada is persistently submitting legal proposals that can be used to improve a society and it also serves as a crucial role to the structure of law and the government and the Canadian Criminal Justice System. A proposal that has drawn a lot of debate is the idea of whether environmental destruction and maltreatment should be criminalized. After examining the given themes, environmental harm should not be considered a crime. The undesirable outcomes of criminalizing environmental harm outweigh the positives of criminalizing such a reform. Although the environment affects people’s lives, so do the laws and regulations. This crime is too broad and may result in more harm than good in the Canadian society and the Canadian Criminal Justice System.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the law shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. the law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems.
  • Explains that the canadian criminal justice system is made up of many components that are constructed to ensure justice for victims of crimes along with criminals.
  • Explains that the law reform commission of canada is constantly importing and suggesting proposals towards the criminal code. the old proposal was that crimes against the environment should be criminalized.
  • Explains that breaking laws by the criminal justice system results in crime, which is prohibited or punishable by law. incorporating the offence of disastrous environmental harm in the criminal code causes it to be recognized as a crime.
  • Explains that every recommendation or proposal that is proposed to the criminal code of canada tends to have negative along with positive aspects, which are considered.
  • Opines that criminalizing environmental harm is a costly contribution to the canadian government and society.
  • Explains the law reform commission of canada's distinction between true crimes and mere offences. true crimes tend to violate essential rules, whereas useful rules are aspects carried out in a special capacity.
  • Explains that environmental harm would be characterized under a true crime if enforced by the canadian government. criminalizing an action tends to influence the crime rate.
  • Explains that overcriminalization influences the seriousness of non-serious offences. the canadian government's proposal about criminalizing disastrous environmental harm would take away serious crimes.
  • Explains that overcriminalization is costly and leads to overcrowding in prisons around the country.
  • Explains that the ouimet committee was principled about how the criminal justice system should be enforced.
  • Opines that criminalizing environmental harm can be considered a peaceful way of correcting the government's flaws in the foundations of law.
  • Opines that environmental maltreatment should be criminalized because serious environmental offences are crimes against the environment, which eventually leads to criminals against human health and life.
  • Explains that environmental harm has a massive impact on human lives, and that criminalizing it will minimize these impacts and respect the law reform commission of canada's aspect to convalesce and support the criminal justice system and the canadian society.
  • Explains that the law reform commission of canada accepts and rejects goals and principles that can be used to improve and support the canadian criminal justice system.
  • Explains that the way legal authorities and the government define environmental harm varies from country to country. many countries have already criminalized it such as the united states, germany and japan.
  • Opines that the law reform commission of canada is a key role in the legal aspect of society. they argue that environmental destruction and maltreatment should not be criminalized.
Get Access