Can the Government Protect Fundamental Rights without Oppressing People and Abusing Power?

Can the Government Protect Fundamental Rights without Oppressing People and Abusing Power?

Length: 1163 words (3.3 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Better Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

The purpose of government is to protect the fundamental rights of life, liberty, health and property, but differences in opinions as to what these rights could mean may create a conflict within society itself. As John C. Calhoun suggests, man is driven by his individual impulses, where his needs and desires are more important to him than the needs and desires of others in the community. It is for this reason that a government must be established so that it protects all people who have differing ideas from being oppressed by the opinion of one group or ruler. The question then occurs as to how government can protect the fundamental rights without oppressing the people or abusing its power. James Madison and John C. Calhoun both came up with very similar solutions to this problem; however, both ideas create new problems with society as their ideas are based on the perfect society, rather than the actual society.
John C. Calhoun suggests that since man is naturally a social being with strong individual impulses, then government is necessary to repel violence from abroad and repress violence and disorder from within the republic. Furthermore, a constitution is a necessity in order to ensure the ruler or the majority of the republic cannot oppress the citizens in the republic or abuse power. Calhoun proposes the two principle elements in the construction of the government must include suffrage and a concurrent majority in order to avoid abuse and oppression. The first principle is necessary in order to hold the rulers of the republic accountable to the people so that they cannot oppress the people because they are dependent on the people. Calhoun also advises that the people should be educated so that they know their rights and the in...

... middle of paper ...

...ention of abuse and oppression will occur. Calhoun on the other hand rejects the system of checks and balances and instead relies on the people of the society and government to compromise with all of the interests in society so that it is fair to both the majority and minority and neither side if oppressed.
In conclusion, while Calhoun and Madison hold similar ideas for the solution of oppression and the abuse of powers by government officials or the majority, Calhoun’s constitutional government provides the better system to protect society because it relies more on a system of compromise which better represents the interests of all people in society. Also, the government is directly affected by the people so that the people can determine who rules them, so it is less likely for one ruler to abuse their power since there power depends on the decisions of the people.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Rhetoric: The Declaration’s of Marxism Essay

- The Declaration of Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson between June 11th and 28th of 1776. This document was created to demonstrate a new concept of government, resonating the thirteen colonies’ reasons for separating from England and declaring war. Moreover, to dissolve the political relationship that America had with England’s laws. This document’s rhetoric was directed at King George the third. Jefferson constructs a philosophical statement that carries the peoples voice and appeals to his readers through fundamental beliefs....   [tags: fundamental beliefs, influences, government]

Better Essays
1824 words (5.2 pages)

The Federal Protectionism of Minority Rights in the United States Essay

- Thomas Jefferson, in his 1801 First Inaugural Address for President of the United States of America, stated, “All . . . will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect and to violate would be oppression (Inaugural Addresses, 1989).” Jefferson was not alone in this thinking. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and others understood that the unbridled power of the majority, which is the life-blood of a democracy, could be easily used to ignore or degrade the rights of a minority group....   [tags: Civil Rights]

Better Essays
2282 words (6.5 pages)

The First Treatise Of Government Shaped The Modern World Essay

- Revolutions are an ideological and physical struggle for change and reform. Political ideologies play an essential role in inspiring the desire for change and act as catalyst for political action to create that change. New ideas, ways of thinking, and an emphasis on scientific knowledge were important in the early modern world. John Locke 's political ideas represent this new way of reasoning about society and the government. John Locke 's Second Treatise of Government shaped the modern world by influencing the American and French Revolutions and providing foundations for the development of American government and society....   [tags: United States Declaration of Independence]

Better Essays
1020 words (2.9 pages)

The Anti Federalists And Federalists Fear Of The Majority Of A New Form Of Government

- By focusing on the merits of a strong central government in Federalist Paper 10 and the disadvantages of the Articles of Confederation in Federalist Paper 15, Madison and Hamilton address the Anti-federalists fear of the tyranny of the majority and ultimately succeed in persuading the Anti-federalists that the necessity and institution of a new form of government will inherently represent the majority without infringing on the rights of the minority. In Federalist 10, Madison focuses primarily on the concerns of Anti-federalists and Federalists alike regarding factions, which he defines as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and a...   [tags: United States Constitution, Democracy]

Better Essays
1039 words (3 pages)

Human Rights : A Fundamental Principle Essays

- Many Western countries take human rights as pretext in counter-terrorism acrions and treating terrorists without considerations of human rights not only affect the development of the global human rights cause, but also contributed to the new terrorism forces. Terrorism refers to behaviors that violate human rights. However, on enacting the counter-terrorism strategies, states need to regard protecting human rights as a fundamental principle. Thus, whether the human rights of terrorists should be protected is difficult to be solved....   [tags: Human rights, Rights, Law]

Better Essays
907 words (2.6 pages)

Governments Must Balance Law with Individual Rights Essay

- The topic of Government, laws and individual rights has always been on the minds of many people. Today is no exception, with the economy in poor shape and with a President who promises many changes to come. Will the changes really come. And if they do will they benefit the people of the United States of America or will they cause more violence and destruction to our economy. They say we have the right of free speech, to speak our minds and vocalize our opinions on topics that are important to us....   [tags: Governments, Law and Order, Individual Rights]

Better Essays
489 words (1.4 pages)

Essay on Government, Justice, and Human Rights

- ABSTRACT: This paper explores the relationship between justice and government, examining views on the subject expressed by traditional political philosophers such as Rousseau and Locke, as well as those expressed by contemporary political theorists such as John Rawls and Robert Nozick. According to Rawls, justice is one of the fundamental concerns of a governing body; Locke and Rousseau agree that government and justice are essentially connected. Nozick and Max Weber, however, claim that the essential characteristic of government is not justice, but power....   [tags: Government Justice Human Rights Papers]

Better Essays
3123 words (8.9 pages)

The European Convention on Human Rights Act 1998 Essay

- The aim of this essay is to critically evaluate the statement 'The European Convention on Human Rights exists to guarantee legal protection to fundamental rights'. It will examine how rights are protected in law and the way the UK approaches the protection of these rights. Explanation will be made of the way that the UK addresses the implementation of the rights in the English legal system. Issues such as conflicting rights and legal limitations will also be considered. An evaluation will be made of whether or not The Human Rights Act 1998 protects the fundamental rights of UK citizens as contained in the European Convention on Human Rights....   [tags: fundamental rights, protection, UK law]

Better Essays
976 words (2.8 pages)

The Eu Charter Of Fundamental Rights Essay

- The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is a document which brings together all of the Fundamental Human Rights together in one, single document. Before the inception of EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the member states of the European Union had many conflicting opinions on what exactly a human right entailed, therefore the need for a single, codified document outlaying the basic Fundamental Human Rights was great. The Charter was issued in 2000 and at this time, according to Jesse Norman, The Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Industry and Energy, ‘The charter was then described as a ‘solemn proclamation’ and was designed to strengthen the EU’S political legitimacy, containing rights...   [tags: European Union, European Parliament]

Better Essays
836 words (2.4 pages)

Essay on Government Regulations and Rights

- American citizens are getting tired of the governments increasing control of the economy, health care, and a dodgy recovery plan (Engstrom, 2). According to a national survey, "Voters are starting to realize that the regulations implemented by government are beginning to intrude more so on people’s personal lives" (Thompson and Tringali, 2). The survey also said that, "A majority of both conservatives (61%) and liberals (54%) say they are both negatively impacted by regulations that tell American business which workers to hire" (Thompson and Tringali, 2)....   [tags: Government]

Better Essays
2334 words (6.7 pages)