Aristotle's Ethics Of A Moral Nurse

For Aristotle the inclusive goal of life would be to attain happiness, ascending from rational thoughts. A key goal would be taking in the perspective of the golden mean and choosing virtuous actions. A virtuous action is considered to moral when has motivation behind it to do the right thing. For people with good character virtues is acquired over time by the repetition of proceeding in virtuous ways. Aristotle felt as though becoming a virtuous person was a matter of habit and could be learned over time. The more a person acts virtuously, the stronger the character trait will become. Looking being a good moral nurse entails the nurse training with making rational choices founded on those they believed to be ethically ideal that a role model

Our reasoning delivers us with purpose to choose to follow or not follow something. That being said we are responsible for whatever choice we make. The CI says that we must always treat humans as rational beings. Our capacity to reason and act morally is what gives us dignity. Our dignity allows us to have inherent moral worth. Every person who is capable of reason is a valuable being. A person is valuable regardless what anyone may value or not value them as. Human beings have a moral responsibility to respect all humans who are humans. The Humanity formulation forbids the objectification of humanity. To act morally you have to respect the worth as persons who are actually above price. To treat a person with a dignity is to recognize them as a person capable of making rational choices. If you were to lie, harm, or treat someone like their only value is being something you need or want, then you are treating them simply as an instrument. Intent has nothing do with Kant’s theory. So putting a patient to a silent death with the intent of saving them pain and not a miserable life, would not be seen as moral to Kant. Initially you are harming them by killing them. You are hurting the family because is it may not be their wishes. The nurse or doctor would be basically lying to the family and may be going against their wishes. You are taking away any chances of life they may have had. This would not be considered moral. Not only are you treating them as an instrument that you can throw away, but also harming/lying to their family and the dismissing the patient. So let’s look at the three steps of the CI procedure. Formulate the maxim; so I am to assist the aiding of the patient with in killing, when doing so I will allow the patient to not suffer or be sick anymore, in order to promote the goal of increasing human welfare. Then simplify the maxim into a law of nature: Everyone always asks for PAD(physician aid in death)