Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

1185 Words3 Pages

Animal testing is not only a morally offensive behavior but also the darkest side of human nature.The animal suffers, feels pain or becomes happy or sad as per the situations, but people have been subjecting animals for medical, cosmetics, new drug or chemical testing purpose without considering the suffering that they may be experiencing. According to the article, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, “Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories for chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics test.” The worst news is that the majorities of these experiments do not contribute to improving human living standards. However the numbers of experimenters who believe there is no curing for possible without doing an experiment in animals. I agree with Ty Johnson in his position paper Animal Testing is Inaccurate, Unbeneficial that Animal testing should be banned for human health and behavioral reasons. It is important to know how animal testing is performed, before analyzing its effects in the physical and mental health of human beings. The conditions of animals in a lab are worse than most people could imagine. When they are in a lab, some are forced to inhale toxic …show more content…

Arsenic is a chemical that almost always causes cancer in humans but when it is tested on animal, it has shown rarely- if ever- cause cancer to develop in animals (Johnson). A healthy person would be a victim of cancer if arsenic would be just tested in animal and apply in a human being. It’s clear that animal testing does not contribute for human purpose. Today, many people are sick or disable not because of their own physical health, but because of the new drug, that tested in animals and assumed it works same in human

Open Document