Although animal testing was a main component for the facilitation of medical research in the past, it is no longer necessary due to the option of alternate testing methods. Animals that fall victim to the mercy of animal research are subject to experimentation for the purpose of manufacturing harmless products (McKnight 2). Cell cultures, the MIMIC system, TraumaMan, in vitro, and human volunteers are substitutes for this inhumane procedure (Sullivan 4; “PCRM Scientists Educate” 10). Animal testing is
disease thanks to animal research but is animal research always beneficial? “Treat others as you would want to be treated,” is what the Golden Rule has taught us for many years. Should we not treat animals the same way we want to be treated in return? The topic of animals being used in medical research has been controversial for many years. One side of the argument says that using animals is the only way to safely test a product before it reaches the public, but others say alternatives should be pursued
Animal testing is important to ensure the safety of a variety of products, specifically pharmaceuticals, vaccines, and medical devices used for surgery and other treatments. It has also been used throughout history for various purposes. Once an unregulated practice, today there are laws, regulations, and requirements associated with the ethical use of animal models. In the United States, animal studies are now required before moving on to clinical trials. Legalities aside, controversy still arises
Another reason animal testing does not make sense is because we have alternative ways of testing. There are many new ways of testing besides testing on animals. By doing these other types of tests, people can save animals from pain and save their lives. In the article, “Alternative Testing” stated, “some new ways of testing could include ways like using tests on cells, using tests on types of tissues, and using tests on computer stimulations” (Howard). The article, “Ban Animal Testing” stated, “that
Looks To Die For The necessity of animal toxicology has been a hotly debated subject ever since the practice was first introduced in America. There is also controversy over whether or not animal testing is ethical. Ingrid Newkirk of PETA states, “When it comes to having a central nervous system, and the ability to feel pain, hunger, and thirst, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy” (qtd. in Breen). This quote describes one aspect of an animal safety activist’s opinion by pushing the idea that we should
is no question that animal testing has made a huge impact on biomedical research and the discovery of various cures and diseases. Because the opposition insists that animal testing is still necessary, the issue is a very controversial one and has attracted a lot of debate recently. Despite the fact, it is absurd to sacrifice thousands of animals every year when there better alternatives for biomedical research currently in North American society. With this in mind, Animal testing should be abolished
Save a Life Every year millions of animals suffer from animal testing. These animals suffer cruel abuse at the hands of humans, the very hands that are suppose to be compassionate and be their voice. These animals are treated like trash and disposed of when testing is complete or die from the cruel nature of the test. It is time to take a stand against animal experiments and tests, it has been proven to have no benefit to humans and there are alternatives that are less costly and do not require
DATE: April 03, 2014 TO: K. Voltan, Vice President FROM: Rob Geis, Marketing Executive SUBJECT: Higher Demand for Non-Animal Tested Cosmetic Products INTRODUCTION L’Oréal Canada and Animal Testing There has been some controversy regarding L’Oréal Canada and their use of animal testing in their cosmetic products. For certifications regarding safety, we currently possess 86% of manufacturing facilities that are either OHSAS 18001 or VPP certified. (L’Oréal Canada, 2014) Safety is a priority for
Animal testing began many decades ago with the intent to advance the world of science. Today, we have come a long way, but, have the testing methods become less unethical? The U.S estimates that 18.5 million animals per year, which is 50,700 per day or one every 1.7 seconds are used for testing. (Biba). Animal testing is a cruel and unethical method for testing purposes because alternative methods have been proven more effective and accurate than animal testing, and animals are harmed during procedures
pets and testing all kinds of products on on them? Most likely you wouldn’t be okay with scientist experimenting on a pet that you love, so why are we not doing anything to prevent scientist from testing animals like bunnies, monkeys, and mice. Animal testing has been around since the late nineteenth century when a French Chemist named Louis Pasteur administered anthrax to a sheep and showed the importance of vaccines with his germ theory. There are beliefs that people were testing on animals before