In support of my first claim, I will offer two reasons. Supporting Animal Rights would hinder both process of understanding diseases and the prevention of unforeseen harmful effects of new treatments, and there are no alternative methods that can completely replace experiments on animals. A consequence of accepting the doctrine of Animal Rights is that humans will no longer be able to experiment on animals. Common animals used in laboratories include rats, which are susceptible to many of the same diseases as humans because we share more than 98% of our DNA with them. Because it is easier to control their external environment compared to humans, the association between certain factors and health outcomes can be more easily detected with minimal confounding. Due to Human Rights, it is very difficult to conduct similar experiments on humans, and therefore, even the most accurate epidemiological experiments such as randomized controlled trials are associated with substantial biases. Accepting Animal Rights will, therefore most likely hinder the process of understanding diseases or how drugs work and therefore will limit or at least severely prolong our ability to cure diseases. Some Animal Rights activists’ groups such as People for Ethical Treatment of Animals argue that ther...
... middle of paper ...
...t is a better option for humans to not accept the doctrine of Animal Rights.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (n.d.). Alternatives to Animal Testing. Retrieved from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals: http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives-animal-testing/
Thibaut, L. M. (2012, 10 24). Understanding diversity–stability relationships: towards a unified model of portfolio effects. Ecology Letters.
Understanding Animal Research. (2014, 11 18). The three Rs. Retrieved 10 02, 2016, from Understanding Animal Research: http://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/how/three-rs/
Understanding Animal Research. (2015, 03 17). Are there alternatives to using animals in research and testing? Retrieved 10 02, 2016, from Understanding Animal Research: http://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/resources
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Animal testing is not only a morally offensive behavior but also the darkest side of human nature.The animal suffers, feels pain or becomes happy or sad as per the situations, but people have been subjecting animals for medical, cosmetics, new drug or chemical testing purpose without considering the suffering that they may be experiencing. According to the article, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, “Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S.... [tags: Human, Health, Animal rights, Animal testing]
1185 words (3.4 pages)
- The phrase “animal testing” relates to procedures performed on living animals for research purposes into biology and diseases, analyzing the effectiveness of new products, and testing human health and the environmental safety of industry products. Every year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, cats, frogs, hamsters, monkeys, fish, birds, and guinea pigs—are killed in laboratories for medical reasons, chemical, drug, cosmetics, and food testing. In addition to the torture they receive on the daily, animals are deprived of everything that is natural and important to them and their way of living.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing, Human, Disease]
1788 words (5.1 pages)
- In this essay, I shall support Mary Anne Warren’s view that animals do have rights but not the same as humans; and partially endorse the views of both Tom Regan and Carl Cohen when it comes to the argument of Animal Rights. Regan believes that it is immoral to use animals in science for any purpose. He wishes for the total abolition of animal agriculture, commercial use, and the use animals in scientific research. I am opposed to Regan’s desire for abolition. There are benefits from the testing of animals.... [tags: Animal rights, Livestock, Human, Animal testing]
781 words (2.2 pages)
- Animal rights can be defined as the rights that are believed to belong to animals to live free from the use in medical research, hunting, and other services to humans. Animal Rights can often be a touchy subject, and there are numerous different opinions regarding animal rights. The purpose of this essay is to touch base on a brief history of animal rights, the laws involved, and various opinions regarding animal rights. There is obviously a distinct communication barrier between humans and animals.... [tags: Animal rights]
1286 words (3.7 pages)
- What should govern our eating habits. Should base our consumption choices on foods that do not degrade the environment. Is it necessary to consider human rights, fair trade and food worker injustices. Should we base the foundation of our eating habits on animal welfare. The meaning of eating ethically is a multifaceted subject. There are so many varying issues when it comes to how humans have influenced the treatment and the development of animals throughout the evolution of man, from the carnivorous Neanderthal to the present day omnivorous Homosapien.... [tags: Agriculture, Livestock, Animal rights]
1105 words (3.2 pages)
- In Tom Regan’s “The case for animal rights.”, Regan argues that animals deserve to have rights because of many reasons. He believes that humans mistreat animals and that we are taking advantage of them. Regan states that not only do we slaughter animals for food, but we use them for multiple tests, clothing, and entertainment as well. To me, although Regan’s argument is very broad, his argument passes by many points that many people don’t think about. Regan believes that animals are a subject of life, they therefore deserve rights of their own.... [tags: Animal rights, Tom Regan, Human, Animal testing]
1172 words (3.3 pages)
- Ever since the dawn of human civilization, people have enclosed animals for their own personal enjoyment. In modern times, animals are now kept in zoos and aquariums not just for entertainment, but also for preventing the extinction of a diversity of species. For the past few decades, animal rights activists have been disputing whether or not if these captive areas have been benefiting the animals or if they are just depriving them from their natural rights. Even though supporters of zoos and aquariums argue that these isolated environments improve animals’ lives; the emotional state, habitat, and nutrition change drastically causing problems for the captive animals.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal welfare, Extinction]
1760 words (5 pages)
- Many people would agree that animals deserve rights some may even say the same as humans.In the essay "An Animal Welfare and Conservation: An Essential Connection", Paul Waldou reflects on his own experiences an animal law professor. The author asks the question "what is the relevance of 'animal rights ' to the rich set of concerns we call out with words like 'environmental, ' 'conservation ' and 'ecological '?" (Waldau 174). He then explains through personal anecdotes and personal reflections the answer to this question.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal welfare, Hunting]
1408 words (4 pages)
- Introduction The human-animal relationship is one that, in recent years, has come under heavy criticism. Organizations, such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), have been trying to raise awareness that this relationship may not be ethical. Changes have been made due to organizations like PETA and the HSUS (Humane Society of The United States). For example, Ringling Brothers Circus recently retired all of its elephants because people were boycotting the circus’s performances. Many people do not find anything about our relationship with animals unethical.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal welfare]
2183 words (6.2 pages)
- Experiment On non-Human Animal Laboratory experimentation of animals has been a hot topic of debate for decades. Advocates of animal’s rights think that it can never be justified because it brings sufferings to animals. They equate animal experimentation to torture. On the other hand there are those who think that humanity should have no qualms about using nature for their own ends. There are more shades of opinion in between and they are frequently reflected in debates over this emotionally and ethically charged topic.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1152 words (3.3 pages)