The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1814 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal benefits from animal testing

Close your eyes and just picture for a second if you could be any animal in the world. Next thing that you know you are captured and being dragged towards a laboratory. You don’t know what is going to happen to you. You are now drugged and being tested for research. Next thing that you know you are not alive anymore and don’t know why it had to happen to you. Another scenario is you are the animal again and a person that you trusted is now hurting you and kicking you. Both of these scenarios are considered animal cruelty and when anyone thinks of this happening it hurts to think that this would happen to an animal. Animal cruelty is serious and people around the world need to think about it and make a logical choice around it. Animal rights …show more content…

Numerous groups of people criticize the animal testing that is going on with our world today. There are many people, and you might be one of them, that agree that animal testing is beneficial to humans. If you ask any scientist if animal testing is the correct thing to do, they will 100% say yes all the time. “Scientists conduct this for many reasons- educational purposes, how different process work and it’s a foundation for anatomy and physiology” ("Animal Testing"). This kind of animal testing that is being done can make a person more intelligent by knowing what is going on in an animal and how the processes work. Another scientist said that it was an educational process too, because it is a foundation of anatomy and physiology. This will make a person understand more into the sections that they are studying and become more proficient in that specific category. Even though this topic is criticized, it is educational for the people testing and the discussions that it leads into. Not only is it a part into anatomy and physiology, but “animal testing is a major part of biomedical research”("Animal Testing"). Without animal testing we wouldn’t have a good biomedical research than we do right now. This …show more content…

The three main organizations that are trying to help are, PETA, ASPCA, and he HSUS. They all work in different fields to do different things to help out in the big plan of ending animal cruelty. The first organization is PETA( People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). “PETA is focused on animals that suffer in factory farms, labs, clothing trade, and entertainment”("Preventing Animal Cruelty"). The fields that PETA focuses on is only a couple of fields. Which is not a bad thing because they are professionals doing their work and not all organizations can be perfect in every field. PETA also has 3 million supporters that are behind them and are trying to stop this just like PETA is trying to do. PETA tries to do the best that they can in the fields that they are working in. It might not seem like a lot, but if they can save a couple of animals then they are advancing in the overall goal that they are trying to achieve. The second main organization trying to prevent animal cruelty is ASPCA( the American Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Animals). Since PETA is working in a couple of fields ASPCA should work in different ones. ASPCA says they are working with “veterinary, legislative, judicial, law enforcement, and social service to educate people and save animals”("Preventing Animal Cruelty"). This is different the other organization because ASPCA works with more of the

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Ag-Gag Laws

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    The modern fight for animal rights has been geared toward factory farms and the removal of animal testing and ag-gag laws. Protection for test animals and farm animals has become an important focus for many animal rights groups including ASPCA. The end of uncomfortable and inhumane treatment of animals is still a fight thousands are fighting

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Dbq

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test

    Read More

  • The Pros of Animal Testing

    1427 Words  | 3 Pages

    Albert Sabin, the developer of the polio vaccine once said, “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Polio is a deadly disease caused by a virus that spreads from person to person. This infectious disease renders the brain and spinal cord helpless while also ensuring a permanent case of paralysis to the victim. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “…13,000 to 20,000 para-lytic cases were reported annually,” before the 18th century. After the introduction of the polio vaccine, “…a total of 2,525 paralytic cases were reported, compared with 61 in 1965.” This dramatic decrease in the prominence of the polio disease can only be attributed to the success of animal testing. Animal experimentation is used in the research of genetics, drug testing, biology, toxicity testing, cosmetic testing, and many other fields. Despite all of its beneficial traits, animal testing has been wildly controversial over the past decades because of its perceived unethical treatment towards animals. Although animal testing may be deemed unethical by many, it is a form of medical testing that has not only saved lives but has also greatly revolutionized the medical world.

    Read More

  • Ethical Treatment Of Animals: The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    Have you ever seen a stray animal on the side of the road and thought nothing of it? It is actions like that and others that continue to make this planet a cruel place for domestic animals to live. Many domestic animals are not created to destroy or harm anyone or anything. They are meant to be surrounded by loving caring humans who want to have a mutually beneficial relationship better them. Sadly, these animals are taken into shelters or pounds and if not claimed or adopted they are euthanized or become test subjects. According to PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, “each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical,

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    845 Words  | 2 Pages

    Approximately 60 million animals are used each year in the laboratories of the United States. Whether or not animal testing is cruel or acceptable is an issue many argue over today. Although most acknowledge the negative effects of animals in laboratories, there are many pros in the scientific research.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1983 Words  | 4 Pages

    One word comes to mind when I think of animal testing: cruel. Animal testing has been a subject of debate for many years. While most people think that using animals to test products is a reasonable approach, in reality the outcome does not always show how the products will react on humans, and the animals suffer unnecessarily. The United States needs to ban all animal testing like the European Union did because testing on animals is cruel and animals should not be dying from it.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcasted their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of

    Read More

  • Pros of Animal Experimentation

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing

    571 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, animal testing not only violates animals’ rights but also is not the best way to research. And the genes are different between animals and humans. Humans need to improve their ways to get the scientific experience and forbid animal testing in order to improve our lives and animals’ lives.

    Read More

  • The Cons of Animal Testing

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical.

    Read More

  • Pros Of Animal Testing

    434 Words  | 1 Pages

    Imagine your sweet cat locked in a cage inside a laboratory with other various animals. Millions of animals every year are locked up in labs for testing. Animals are used to test medications, cosmetics, biology lessons, and for medical training. Thousands of mice, rats, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are used for testing. Most of these animals will die in cruel testing experiments. Animal testing is tortures to the animals, an unreliable option for medication, and there are better safer options for testing.

    Read More

  • Animal Ethics Case Study: Animal Experimentation

    737 Words  | 2 Pages

    The animal rights movement opposes organizations that use animals for research, food, clothing, and human entertainment. Since animals are often seen feeling pain and distress, they argue that animals deserve greater moral consideration and legal protection than human beings generally give them. The animal rights movement was designed to aid the animal protection, or animal welfare, movement, and strongly opposes the idea of animal experiments that lead to suffering or death . “Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), and the Human Society continue to question the need for animal research and argue that alternatives are being neglected” (Ch. 17, pg.

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years animal rights groups and organizations have frowned upon animal experiments. Animal testing has been thought to be inhumane and cold-hearted to animals. Because of these accusations medical researchers have to suffer threats from individuals and the media. If animal testing weren’t allowed would that be a drawback in advancement in medical research? Animal testing is beneficial to people because these trails lead to improvements in medical research. Animal experiments have led to finding new cures and vaccines to fatal illnesses. Because animal experiments are helpful in making vaccines to prevent these sicknesses, these trails are the reason so many lives are saved. Animal testing is very necessary and useful to people, but animal rights groups believe that these trails doesn’t benefit humanity. According to Ellen Paul, “Breakthroughs in treating injuries, like practically all medical advances, depend upon experimentation on animals.” Animal experiments have given way to many new instruments to fight against diseases like cancer (Paul). For example, mice and other rodents contributed to scientists developing new tools for fighting different forms of cancers (Paul). Animal testing has helped science in many ways, but animal organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) believe that these experiments are cruel to animals. Even though most animals endure some sort of pain during these experiments, the results are very beneficial to people.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Open Document