Book Of The Dead Analysis

744 Words2 Pages

“The Book of the Dead” by Muriel Rukeyser is a great example of Mike Gold’s definition of proletarian literature for many reasons. It also has a few characteristics that differ from Gold’s definition. “The Book of the Dead” is a very long poem describing the Hawks Nest Tunnel disaster that killed thousands of workers in the early twentieth century and their endeavor to seek justice. There are three reasons why this work is an accurate representation of Gold’s proletarian literature. Those reasons are: it is about the worker, relatable to real life, and technical and factual. One of Gold’s standards is that proletarian literature be about the worker. “The Book of the Dead” is about the horrible working conditions that miners had to endure in the thirties and their journey to justice . Rukeyser wrote, “The …show more content…

She told the story of a man names Mearl Blankenship. He wrote a letter to the paper in attempt to receive some compensation. Rukeyser did not just illustrate how it affected the workers, but how it affect their families as well. In one section she wrote, “I am a Married Man and have a family” (MEARL BLANKENSHIP). That line made it more personal and relatable to readers. His death by the silica is not just affecting him. It is affecting his family as well. The next story is that of a mother with three boys and a husband that worked in the tunnels. Her youngest son, Shirley, died of silicosis at eighteen years of age. Shirley told his mother, “Mother, when I die,/ I want you to have them open me up and/ see if that dust killed me” (ABSALOM). Readers can try to relate to the mother’s loss and anger. Rukeyser’s use of family stories allows the reader to empathize with them. The use of empathy is a good tactic to get readers to feel the anger and sorrow that the families were feeling, and hopefully inflict change on that

Open Document