He will also explain why he believes why theism is better than theists. To show how it is a bit more reasonable he uses a “proof” instead of using a “theory” to help explain his argument. McCloskey has concepts that may be true but they are not able to be proven because there is nothing that can be proven hundred percent and that makes it hard to be proven. McCloskey does state that “moat theist do not come to believe in God as a basis for religious believe, but come to religion as a result of other reasons and factors,” (McCloskey, 62). He believes that all the arguments that he makes, do not make a case that ca prove the existence of the one true God.
The proofs that McCloskey argued against were used to establish that there is no case for the existence for God. The three theistic proofs were the cosmological argument, theological argument, and the argument that is from the design. The case that he puts these three together is that of what he presents them as. The first claim which is the Cosmological case make the claim for there is an existence for God, the second case Theological is the case is an intelligent case, and then the Moral case talks about what is morally perfect. With these three together we can call them the Cumulative case, which talks about the argument of personal, moral, and the intelligent creator of the universe that we live in. All three of these argu...
... middle of paper ...
... helps people understand that the life here on earth is only a small part of the life that we are meant to live. McCloskey also talks about if there were a God and if God was ready to take the child then it is God’s will and no one should fight it. This is where McCloskey is claiming defeat.
From what I have read I have believe that there really is a God and that is why everyone on this earth is and here and that we are all meant to be here for a certain reason. McCloskey makes very good arguments to try and prove the existence of God and they are very strong when they are all together but not when they are separate. Everyone though is entitled to believe and think whatever they want. As for myself I believe that there is such thing as a God and I believe that is what made this assignment a little hard for me because I do believe that there such thing as a God.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- McCloskey in his article, "On Being An Atheist" claims that proofs or arguments which theists provide to support their belief “have no weight”. He speaks of this primarily in relation to the ontological argument, the argument which attempts to show that the very concept of God implies his reality. McCloskey believes that there is no point in debating on this particular proof because it has no bearing but the ontological argument serves as the very foundation for other arguments which supports and defends God’s existence.... [tags: Refutation to H. J. McCloskey]
1606 words (4.6 pages)
- In his article, "On Being an Atheist" Mccloskey gives a few contentions that look to support the non-presence of God, Atheism. This he does utilizing a few cases made by theists on a general level and in addition centering all the more on the Christian God. The cases are isolated into a few segments whereupon he lays his countering contentions. At the presentation, he gives a concise review of the contentions exhibited by theists, who he alludes to as "confirmations," guaranteeing that none of the evidences make enough avocation to accept that God does exist.... [tags: god, malevolent world, atheism]
1676 words (4.8 pages)
- The article “Is there a God?” was written by Russell in 1952 at the request of a London magazine; however, it was not published (547-548). Russell, an advocate of science, was known for his unconventional views and social criticism (“Irvine”). This article came at a time when science was finally establishing significant ground. Discoveries in the 20th century such as the theory of relativity, evolution and quantum mechanics meant that people were finally looking towards scientists for answers (Polanyi).... [tags: Atheism, Article Critique]
1897 words (5.4 pages)
- ... The authors of this study mention that majority of studies focus on measuring religiosity by examining church attendance and the importance of religion to the population that was being studied, but there were not many studies that compared and contrasted religious with nonreligious youth. For this reason, the authors of this study wanted to study the differences in psychological functioning between adolescent who identify as atheist, agnostic, and religious through a profile analysis approach.... [tags: Atheism, Agnosticism, Irreligion, Deism]
882 words (2.5 pages)
- This gentleman is six foot two, short black hair, black eyes, and with no real distinguishing marks. He is heterosexual, African American, and is An Atheist. His name is David, and he is walking home while wearing sweat pants with a ripped up t-shirt that was from home. Some people would consider this gentleman to be poor and have a horrible education with nothing good on his mind. However David is a part-time firefighter, with a part-time job, and also being part time college student. There is a difference between people hardcore supporting their culture or beliefs, compared to individuals who get stereotyped like David for example.... [tags: Stereotype, Stereotypes, Protagonist, Culture]
991 words (2.8 pages)
- Response to McCloskey Introduction In his article “On Being an Atheist”, H.J. McCloskey, an Australian philosopher took a serious stance on arguments against the existence of God. He offered numerous reasons for the stance he took including, the problem with evil to suggest that one should not believe in God. McCloskey believes that atheism is a much more comfortable and understandable belief as opposed to believing in God who allows the suffering of innocent people just to get the glory out of their lives and achieve the ultimate good.... [tags: Australian Philosopher, Article Response]
1456 words (4.2 pages)
- “It is useful for us to remind ourselves of the reasons for and virtues of our belief” is a quote that rings true in McCloskey’s essay On Being an Atheist. Assessing why we believe something is a necessary part of truly understanding our beliefs. Throughout the article McCloskey argues against the proofs often used for theism. Specifically he addresses the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and the problem of evil. He uses all of these points to argue that atheism is a “much more comfortable belief than theism…” (McCloskey) Before addressing the specific proofs McCloskey addresses, it is necessary to point to one error in McCloskey’s essay.... [tags: Theology, God, Cosmological argument, Existence]
1766 words (5 pages)
- For over a millennia, philosophers and theologians alike have disputed the existence of God. From my perspective, it seems as though the atheists are on the attack against theists in the hopes to disprove the existence of God so that they find some comfort in their bleak outlook on mankind’s existence. McCloskey, an outspoken atheist, wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist” in which he examined and tried to disprove three arguments that he believed convinced many theists of God’s existence.... [tags: On Being an Athiest, McCloskey]
1345 words (3.8 pages)
- The article “On Being an Atheist” by H.J. McCloskey provides much insight into the atheistic viewpoint. It provides comparison to the opposing theistic perspective pertaining to the existence of God. It argues for the reasons and virtues behind the belief of atheism to prove its superiority over theism as a source of strength. In the essay, McCloskey refers to arguments like the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and arguments from design as proofs. He argues that since there is no evidence to prove these arguments to be true, therefore they aren’t and for that reason the idea of the mere existence of God should be removed from our thinking.... [tags: On Being an Athiest, H.J. McCloskey]
1474 words (4.2 pages)
- To be honest with you I think some of McCloskey questions of the existence of God are based and as a Christian I know I have questioned the existence of God at one point in my life. I had to really learn the hard way. From the article one can see that McCloskey is trying very hard to dismiss every claim of the theistic view. From the videos on blackboard, when someone decides to prove something or someone, then that means there is certainty and assurance that thing is absolutely true. The truth of the matter is that we cannot prove one hundred percent of the existence of God and that is why an Atheist like McCloskey would say that without evidence then there is no God.... [tags: Christianity, Deity]
1412 words (4 pages)