McCloskey states in the second paragraph of his article that “proofs” are not the reason most theists come to theism (McCloskey 1968). This statement is not supported with statistics in his article, but is true. Most theists do not consider cosmological or theological arguments when deciding to believe in God. Mike Fleischmann conducted a survey which determined that 56% of Christians come to Christianity during a significant transition period or crisis. These events include marriage, becoming a parent, illness, family-related issues, finances, and many more (Fleishmann 2010). These people also did not grow up in a Christian home, so that did not influence their decision to become a theist. They were also between the ages of 21 and 50 when they came to Christianity. His research also showed that 11.4% of these people do not remember the exact moment they decided to become a Christian. The...
... middle of paper ...
... hand, Christians believe that an afterlife and they would find comfort and security in knowing that if the child did die- they would go to Heaven.
McCloskey’s article addresses the cosmological argument, the theological argument, faith, the existence of evil, and free will. As he discusses his views on each of those subjects, he keeps a similar theme throughout his article. This theme is the concern of an omnipotent, all-powerful, and all-perfect God making an imperfect world where evil exists. The best way to respond to his concerns is through Augustine’s views of why and how evil coexists with good. Also, many theists belief in God gives them comfort and security, because they do not believe God is the cause of evil. I think this article is a great representation of the views of atheists and is good for people to read who do not know much about atheists’ beliefs.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- “It is useful for us to remind ourselves of the reasons for and virtues of our belief” is a quote that rings true in McCloskey’s essay On Being an Atheist. Assessing why we believe something is a necessary part of truly understanding our beliefs. Throughout the article McCloskey argues against the proofs often used for theism. Specifically he addresses the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and the problem of evil. He uses all of these points to argue that atheism is a “much more comfortable belief than theism…” (McCloskey) Before addressing the specific proofs McCloskey addresses, it is necessary to point to one error in McCloskey’s essay.... [tags: Theology, God, Cosmological argument, Existence]
1766 words (5 pages)
- For over a millennia, philosophers and theologians alike have disputed the existence of God. From my perspective, it seems as though the atheists are on the attack against theists in the hopes to disprove the existence of God so that they find some comfort in their bleak outlook on mankind’s existence. McCloskey, an outspoken atheist, wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist” in which he examined and tried to disprove three arguments that he believed convinced many theists of God’s existence.... [tags: On Being an Athiest, McCloskey]
1345 words (3.8 pages)
- The article “On Being an Atheist” by H.J. McCloskey provides much insight into the atheistic viewpoint. It provides comparison to the opposing theistic perspective pertaining to the existence of God. It argues for the reasons and virtues behind the belief of atheism to prove its superiority over theism as a source of strength. In the essay, McCloskey refers to arguments like the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and arguments from design as proofs. He argues that since there is no evidence to prove these arguments to be true, therefore they aren’t and for that reason the idea of the mere existence of God should be removed from our thinking.... [tags: On Being an Athiest, H.J. McCloskey]
1474 words (4.2 pages)
- In the article “ On Being an Atheist,” H.J. McCloskey attempts to inform his readers that the belief in atheism is a “much more comfortable belief” by effectively using a disdainful rhetoric towards theists and their faith. McCloskey delves into both the Cosmological and Teleological arguments, which within he criticizes the arguments and to further his argument against theism, he also presents the Problem of Evil and why evil cannot possibly exist with a perfect God being the creator of universe.... [tags: Response, Breakdown, Arguments]
1244 words (3.6 pages)
- In the article “On Being an Atheist”, H. J. McCloskey tries to show that believing in God is unreasonable. McCloskey first tries to point out flaws in theism by trying to disprove the cosmological and the teleological arguments. After trying to show the flaws in the two argument he brings up the problem of evil to try to discredit theism as a self-contradictory belief. At the end of his article he tries to show his readers that atheism is comforting and that theism is not. When you go through McCloskey’s argument it shows many flaws in his reasoning as he wanted to show that it is impossible that there is a God.... [tags: response paper]
1271 words (3.6 pages)
- Response to McCloskey Introduction In his article “On Being an Atheist”, H.J. McCloskey, an Australian philosopher took a serious stance on arguments against the existence of God. He offered numerous reasons for the stance he took including, the problem with evil to suggest that one should not believe in God. McCloskey believes that atheism is a much more comfortable and understandable belief as opposed to believing in God who allows the suffering of innocent people just to get the glory out of their lives and achieve the ultimate good.... [tags: Australian Philosopher, Article Response]
1456 words (4.2 pages)
- H J McCloskey intelligently put his thoughts together and shared his beliefs in his article called “On Being an Athiest” addressing some key arguments discussed in atheism and theism from an atheistic point of view. He makes no apologies for bringing up a difficult topic and for trying to argue persuasively for his views. He makes a great point when he states, “…I make no apology for doing so, as it is useful for us to remind ourselves of the reasons for and virtues of our beliefs (50).” Whether a theist or an atheist we should know what we believe and why we believe what we believe.... [tags: philosophy, atheism, theism, belief]
1361 words (3.9 pages)
- McCloskey in his article, "On Being An Atheist" claims that proofs or arguments which theists provide to support their belief “have no weight”. He speaks of this primarily in relation to the ontological argument, the argument which attempts to show that the very concept of God implies his reality. McCloskey believes that there is no point in debating on this particular proof because it has no bearing but the ontological argument serves as the very foundation for other arguments which supports and defends God’s existence.... [tags: Refutation to H. J. McCloskey]
1606 words (4.6 pages)
- ... McCloskey claims that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-prefect, uncaused cause.” The argument does not state there is a God, but it makes a claim that something caused everything to come into existence. The view of a theist is that there is a God and this argument gives “key elements of the theistic conception of God” (1982, 59). With the conclusion of this argument, many views of God can be determined. “If someone accepts the conclusion, the proper attitude for him to adopt is surely a desire to learn more about God” (ibid, 59).... [tags: cosmological, evils, beliefs]
1263 words (3.6 pages)
- The Ontological Argument is an argument that claims the existence of God through the meaning of words and the idea of logic. Ontological literally means ‘concerned with being’. The argument concludes that the definition of God ultimately infers his existence, and Anselm, who was the main proponent of the argument argued that the existence of God was logically necessary due to the definition of God – ‘that which nothing greater can be conceived’. The main proponents of this argument are Anselm, Descartes, Malcolm, and Platinga and the main opponents are Aquinas, Kant, and Gaunilo.... [tags: Ontology, Existence, Metaphysics, Atheism]
1026 words (2.9 pages)