Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rights to own guns
American history of freedom essay
The story of American freedom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rights to own guns
When America was first formed it was deemed land of the free and home of brave with freedom to go as you please and hold a weapon. As America progressed into the future it has lost its luster and has become a country of laws that no longer protect the freedom that Americans once had. This loss of control has turned America for the worse and is creating a home that is less wanted by all. America is no longer land of the free and home of the brave. It has been disheveled into a state of turmoil with freedom not being a main priority and people are being frisked against their will as well as the government is pushing their programs which does not help the overall state of Americas economy.
One of the first issues with the “new” America could easily be dealt with using the second amendment. Many people misunderstand this amendment and believe that it is only the right to protect a militia not the right for all people to have control of guns (reading). This misunderstanding could be the reason as to why so many laws are placed into effect although the law does state “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (amend. II). This means that people have the right to have guns and that the government should not be allowed to take that right away unless under circumstances of crime. Although they are taking civilians guns away the crime rate should go down. This being said, in the case of the United States it continues to rise compared to Switzerland where there are few gun laws and crime rates are exceedingly low. This could be due to the attitude of the Swiss which is based on civic virtue whereas America does not train in civic virtue (Guns). In Switzerland, they issue all males assault rifles for their militi...
... middle of paper ...
...hen P. Halbrook." Guns, Crime, and the Swiss - by Stephen P. Halbrook. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Feb. 2014.
"The NSA May Not Be Listening to Your Private Phone Calls, but It Has Been Watching Your Private Parts." ZDNet. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
"Reading the Second Amendment." : The Freeman : Foundation for Economic Education. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
Sanchez, Ray, and Haley Draznin and Steve Kastenbaum. "New York Drops Appeal of Controversial Stop-and-frisk Ruling." CNN. Cable News Network, 30 Jan. 2014. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
Sprung, Shlomo. "25 More Signs That America Is Not The Greatest Country On Earth." Business Insider. Business Insider, Inc, 25 June 2012. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.
U.S. Const. amend. II, sec. 1
U.S. Const. amend. IV, sec. 1
"Yes, the Obamacare Train Wrecks Continue. | National Review Online." National Review Online. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
Since its ratification in December of 1791, the Second Amendment has created a major controversy as Americans have been arguing over the meaning and interpretation of the amendment. Due to the controversy, “angry polarization and distortion, rather
Beard, Charles Austin. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1998. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed February 23, 2014
The stop-and-frisk policy could be considered a big controversy facing New York in recent times. The whole concept behind this stopping-and-frisking is the police officer, with reasonable suspicion of some crime committed or about to be committed, stops a pedestrian, questions them, then if needed frisks the person. This policy started gaining public attention back in 1968 from the Terry v. Ohio case. A police officer saw the three men casing a store and he believed they were going to rob the store; this led to him stopping and frisking them. After frisking them, he found a pistol and took the weapon from the men. The men then cried foul and claimed they were unconstitutionally targeted and frisked.
Do the First and Fourth Amendments Protect?" Current Issues & Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 5th ed. Boston: Bedford/St Martin's, 1999. 316-324.
People have been debating the meaning of the Second Amendment since its ratification on December 15, 1791. One side feels that the Second Amendment was added to the Constitution to protect collective rights as seen in ”United States v. Miller,” while the opposing side feels that it was meant to protect individual
Sprung, S. (2012, June 25). 25 More Signs That America Is Not The Greatest Country On Earth. In Business Insider. Retrieved from: http://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-25-more-signs-that-america-is-not-1-2012-6#ixzz2z2x3H25v
The United State of America, established by the Founding Father who lead the American Revolution, accomplished many hardship in order to construct what America is today. As history established America’s future, the suffering the United State encountered through history illustrate America’s ability to identify mistakes and make changes to prevent the predictable. The 2nd Amendment was written by the Founding Father who had their rights to bear arms revoked when they believe rising up to their government was appropriate. The Twentieth Century, American’s are divided on the 2nd Amendment rights, “The right to bear arms.” To understand why the Founding Father written this Amendment, investigating the histories and current measures may help the American people gain a better understanding of gun’s rights in today’s America.
Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.
This debate has produced two familiar interpretations of the Second Amendment. Advocates of stricter gun control laws have tended to stress that the amendment’s militia clause guarantees nothing to the individual and that it only protects the states’ rights to be able to maintain organized military units. These people argue that the Second Amendment was merely used to place the states’ organized military forces beyond the federal government’s power to be able to disarm them. This would guarantee that the states would always have sufficient force at their command to abolish federal restraints on their rights and to resist by arms if necessary. T...
In America guns have been a major topic of controversy and have been at the forefront of many political debates. Our forefathers created the Second Amendment, which allows American citizens the right to bear arms. There are many who support the Second Amendment right to bear arms, but there are also many who oppose it. Those who support the Second Amendment often do so because it is their fundamental right granted to them by the United States Constitution. The Second Amendment allows citizens to have the ability to protect themselves and their property from outside adversaries. In contrast, there is almost not a single day in America where gun related violence is not reported in the news. This leads many to believe that guns are a key contributor to the increase in violent and deadly crimes. This has caused many to push for stricter
Early America was a place for anyone to live their life the way that they wanted, as it is now, but back then this was a new concept. Much of this idea comes from the freedoms obtained by living here. Many other countries in the world had many freedoms, but not as numerous as they were in America shortly after the country was founded. Americans during the late 1700's and early 1800's embraced their freedoms and became leaders and expanders, and what we now consider the founders of many present-day cities and towns. One thing that has been present throughout the generations of people living in America, is the desire to set themselves apart from other nations. This want was supplied to the American people in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. These two documents gave the American people everything they needed to set them apart from the rest. Based on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, America was able to create an identity including freedom, religion, and individuality that is very unique to this country.
Professional champions of civil rights and civil liberties have been unwilling to defend the underlying principle of the right to arms. Even the conservative defense has been timid and often inept, tied less, one suspects, to abiding principle and more to the dynamics of contemporary Republican politics. Thus a right older than the Republic, one that the drafters of two constitutional amendments the Second and the Fourteenth intended to protect, and a right whose critical importance has been painfully revealed by twentieth-century history, is left undefended by the lawyers, writers, and scholars we routinely expect to defend other constitutional rights. Instead, the Second Amendment’s intellectual as well as political defense has been left in the unlikely hands of the National Rifle Association (NRA). And although the NRA deserves considerably better than the demonized reputation it has acquired, it should not be the sole or even principal voice in defense of a major constitutional provision.
For years, America has always been perceived as one of the top world powers due to its ability of achieving so much technological, economical, and social progress within a mere couple decades. Despite their great accomplishments, America is actually regressing psychologically, preventing the country from reaching its true potential as an “opportunity rich” country. In Anthony Burgess’ Is America Falling Apart? , the author unveils the circumstances in which America’s restricting society and selfish ideology cause the nation to develop into the type of society it tried to avoid becoming when it separated from the British Empire.
The Economist states in an editorial that when people can get guns more easily there are more deaths which are caused by guns. There is a research result in 1996 about murders with guns. According to this research, there were two murders in New Zealand, fifteen in Japan, 30 in United Kingdom, 106 in Canada, 211 in Germany. On the other hand, in the USA, there were 9,390 gun related murders (America, 1998). This is a plain fact. Though there is a difference in population between each countries, it seems that there are too many gun related murders in the USA. Firearms-related incidents are taking place even in countries that it is illegal to possess guns. Therefore, it is needless to say that more gun related incidents would be occurring if the government permits gun ownership.
All around the world you hear about how everyone believes that America is the best country in the world. Listening to all these stories about how this country is “The Land of Liberty” shows why the U.S has had such a tremendous influence. People are always expressing their passion for this country, but they don't know the entire truth. The United States has had many problems, it's just unavoidable, but this country is giving false hope for many people around the world that this is the best place on Earth. Here in America we are promised that every man woman and child will be treated fairly no matter the cause, however in many instances this is not the case. Today, even though we are promised this, there is no freedom and justice for all.