Posession of Guns in the USA
analytical Essay
1374 words
Posession of Guns in the USA
Zimring and Hawkins states that America is a gun culture with these words from the report of the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence in 1969. "Firearms have long been an important part of American life. For many years the armed citizen-soldier was the country's first line of defense. Firearms no longer play a significant role in keeping food on American tables, yet Americans own and use firearms to a degree that puzzles many observers. If our frontier has disappeared, our frontier tradition remains" (Zimring and Hawkins, 1987: 30).
The Economist states in an editorial that when people can get guns more easily there are more deaths which are caused by guns. There is a research result in 1996 about murders with guns. According to this research, there were two murders in New Zealand, fifteen in Japan, 30 in United Kingdom, 106 in Canada, 211 in Germany. On the other hand, in the USA, there were 9,390 gun related murders (America, 1998). This is a plain fact. Though there is a difference in population between each countries, it seems that there are too many gun related murders in the USA. Firearms-related incidents are taking place even in countries that it is illegal to possess guns. Therefore, it is needless to say that more gun related incidents would be occurring if the government permits gun ownership.
However, is it really necessary for citizens to possess guns in this modern life?
According to The Economist, most citizens in the USA want to own guns whether they use them or not despite of fact that guns are dangerous and the cause of death. To become an owner of gun, they don't care about the price. The reason is that they think firearms are in...
... middle of paper ...
...gun related accidents. To reduce gun related incidents and gun related accidents, more strict gun law is necessary.
Works Cited
America and guns. (1998). The Economist, 346, (8062), 16-17.
Australia: Earthy Hell. (1996). The Economist, 339, (7964), 35.
Barnard, J. (1998). Suspended student kills one in high school cafeteria; two dead at his home. The Oregonian. (May 21).
Lacayo, R. (1995). A small-bore success. Time, 145, (7), 47.
Sheley, J. & Wright, J. (1995). In the line of fire. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
West, W. (1996). When citizens carry sidearms, crooks bear the consequences. Insight on
The News, 12, (13), 48.
Witkin, G. (1997). Handgun stealing made real easy. U.S. News & World Report, 122,
(22), 34-35.
Zimring, F. & Hawkins, G. (1998). The citizen's guide to gun control. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how zimring and hawkins states that america is a gun culture. firearms have long been an important part of american life.
- Analyzes how the economist states that when people can get guns more easily there are more deaths which are caused by guns.
- Explains that most citizens in the usa want to own guns whether they use them or not despite of fact that guns are dangerous and the cause of death.
- Explains that in countries which prohibit the possessing guns by law, incident such as a teenager kills his or her friends with guns in school usually doesn't occur. in the united states, gun related incident by teenager sometimes occur when people forget former incident.
- Explains that zimring and hawkins disagree with people who own guns for protection, stating that 60 percent of accidental firearm related deaths occur in the home.
- Explains that teenagers get guns mainly by theft. their common targets are homes and cars. 500,000 guns are stolen from homes, cars, gun shops, and even directly from manufacturers.
- Explains that kinkel confessed to the police that he stole his parents' guns, but was arrested one time the day before gun shooting in high school.
- Explains that in half of the states in the united states, citizens can get permit easily to carry a gun. state governments explain that citizens feel relief and protect themselves by having guns.
- Explains the brady gun law, which requires a five-day waiting period and background check for people who want to buy guns.
- Opines that it will be impossible for any program to eliminate guns from the citizens, but it is possible to reduce gun related incidents and gun-related accidents.
- Describes the works citedamerica and guns, the economist, earthy hell, and lacayo.
Related
- opinion
- analytical
- argumentative
- Argumentative Essay: Why Guns Should Be Banned?opinion essayHartigan, Pamela, and Elaine Lammas. "Gun Control." Encyclopedia of Public Health. Ed. Lester Breslow. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2002. 511-513. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 3 May 2014.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that americans have right to possess guns so that they can protect themselves from dangerous situations. however, there are benefits when guns are restricted to own except police and security.
- Explains that people who prefer to own guns say that guns are not killing people but the users. however, studies have shown that most of the killer said that they did not plan to kill the victims.
- Explains that guns are one of the best killing weapons; they are created to put an end to the life of a target that it aims at.
- Opines that reducing the ability of suicide is the second benefit when guns are restricted.
- Opines that reducing shootings in public is the best benefit when guns are restricted.
- Concludes that guns reduce homicides, reduce the ability of suicide, and reduce deaths from gun related crimes.
- Cites hartigan, pamela, and elaine lammas. "gun control." encyclopedia of public health. lester breslow.
- Opines that there should be stricter gun control laws. information plus reference series spring 2005.
776 wordsRead More - America Needs Gun Control Lawsanalytical essayAlpers, Philip and Marcus Wilson. 2013. Guns in the United States: Facts, Figures and Firearm Law. Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney. GunPolicy.org, 14 March.10 April 2013.http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states
In this essay, the author
- Opines that gun control laws will limit the access to obtain firearms. guns can reduce passion crimes and suicides, and in australia, they have passed laws that have reduced homicide.
- Argues that the second amendment is granting the right to have a militia as well as "the people" to protect the nation with firearms.
- Opines that guns should be controlled and monitored by the government because they have contributed to killings in america and the horrific tragedies.
- Argues that gun control laws in america can be effective for american society and potently have the same effect as gun controls laws have on australia.
- Proposes a solution that would limit the death toll by gun violence in american civilization. firearms have been used for massacres, homicides and gun related accidents.
- Explains that guns in the united states: facts, figures and firearm law.
900 wordsRead More - Why Should Guns Be Bannedargumentative essayGuns have been a major problem for years upon years in the United States. Many people have concerned about gun control and they are protesting strongly against “bearing arms”. “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention listed firearms as the #12 cause of all deaths between 1999 and 2013, representing 1.3% of total deaths. They were also the #1 method of death by homicide (66.6% of all homicides) and by suicide (52.2% of all suicides)” (qtd. in "Gun Control"). A gun is a big factor that threatens human life. People use it to commit suicide or commit crime, and in those situations it can cause death and serious injuries. The FBI says, “Firearms are used in roughly 7 in 10 killings” between 2013 and 2014 (qtd. In Simon and Sanchez). Considering the amount of gun death that involve in dire situations are more than in the cases that protect or help civilians.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that guns have been a major problem for years in the united states. people use them to commit suicide or commit crime, and in those situations it can cause death and serious injuries.
- Explains that gun violence involves every segment of society, such as school shootings, robbery, and kidnapping. firearms are being used more on violence within the u.s.
- Explains that police are involved in gun violence, not assisted in it, but they are the people who start it. recently in new york, a chinese police accidentally shot and got suit.
- Estimates that gun violence costs the american economy at least $229 billion every year, including $8.6 billion in direct expenses such as for emergency and medical care.
- Argues that the second amendment allows people to have guns, but it is only true for armies to bear arms.
- Explains that people purchased firearms for self-defense because they feel insecure about being able to protect themselves from criminals.
- Explains that the second amendment was intended to protect the right of militias to own guns, not the rights of individuals.
1387 wordsRead More - Stricter Gun Control Essayanalytical essayA clear comparison can be made between the United States and countries like Japan. The Atlantic writes, “Of the 23 ‘rich’ countries, the U.S. gun-related murder rate is almost 20 times that of the other 22” (Fisher, 1). There is an evident correlation between looser gun control laws, higher gun ownership and higher gun-related death rates. In contrast, Japan has one of the strictest gun control laws among other developed countries, and show the least amount of gun-related deaths. The Atlantic also illustrates, “In 2008, the U.S. had over 12 thousand firearm-related homicides. All of Japan only experienced 11, fewer than were killed at the Aurora shooting alone” (Fisher, 1). In Japan, simply firing a gun would break three separate laws; one for holding a gun, one for possessing unlicensed bullets and another for firing them. Simply put, making firearms more difficult to acquire causes less exposure to them, ultimately reducing firearm usage. Not to mention, stricter gun control laws and reduced gun ownership minimizes firearm-related incidents, as can be seen after the mass shooting in Australia. In 1996, the tragic event occurred at Port Arthur historic site in Tasmania, one of Australia’s largest tourist destinations. The shooting resulted in 35 fatalities and over 20 injuries. As a result, Australia has strengthened their firearm control laws, and no
In this essay, the author
- Opines that harsher handgun laws and licensing are crucial to reduce crime and violence in a country.
- Argues that the negative gun-related effects of possessing legal firearms outweigh its means of protection.
- Explains that stricter handgun laws and licensing reduces intentional and accidental gun deaths among the youth.
- Compares the u.s.'s gun-related murder rate with that of countries like japan.
- Explains that stricter gun laws and licensing would reduce homicide and suicide rates and gun violence as a whole.
- Opines that stricter gun control and ownership laws can prevent gun-related crimes and deaths.
- Argues that stronger gun control laws rid the possibility of gun-related violence, crime and death, and more difficultly accessible guns would reduce exposure to the youth.
1418 wordsRead More - America Needs Gun Controlanalytical essayThere is an American consensus for some form of gun control. “…[F]irearms were involved in two-thirds of all murders in the United States and [t]he United States leads the world's richest nations in gun deaths…murders, suicides, and accidental deaths due to guns - according to a study published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the International Journal of Epidemiology” (Lepore). There might be some far extreme people who think that all guns should be banned but most sane Americans do not think that gun rights should be abolished. Americans regard self-defense as the most compelling reason to have a gun and twenty-two percent of households have handguns in the United States. However many people do think that gun control laws must be enacted and enforced. Pro-gun extremists and the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) must understand that there is a real for many people at the uncontrolled s...
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the second amendment protects an individual's right to own guns while protecting the right of states to maintain militias. the constitution is not a document of total clarity.
- Opines that there is an american consensus for some form of gun control, stating that the united states leads the world's richest nations in gun deaths, but most sane americans don't think that gun rights should be abolished.
- Explains that almost 100,000 people in america are shot or killed with a gun. hysterical gun owners oppose any gun control and often think that the government wants to take away their rights to own firearms.
- Argues that guns should not be banned, but should be balanced with some government regulations to ensure that firearms do not get into the wrong hands of felons, criminals and the mentally ill.
- Opines that america faces tragic mass shootings and senseless homicides that take the lives of our citizens. the debate on gun control goes round and round with finger pointing and nothing accomplished.
- Explains that most european countries have stricter gun regulations than the united states. gun owners must be licensed and firearms registered and stored in a safe and secure way.
- Argues that the nra and gun rights extremists are so fond of the second amendment that they believe that it is their god-given right to bear arms.
- Argues that gun violence is on the hands or the consciences of gun rights supporters who have refused to acknowledge that we need new gun control laws.
- Explains that obama's silence on gun control pleases no one. carter, gregg lee. guns in american society: a-l santa barbara; abc-clio, incprint.
- Explains the brady campaign to prevent gun violence's "gun law european style." time europe vol. 159 no. 19.
1161 wordsRead More - The Bill of Rights Amendmentsopinion essayCarter, Gregg Lee. Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. New York: ABC-Clio, 2012. Print.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united states constitution has an amendment process that has been included in the bill of rights. the second amendment guarantees american citizens the right to keep and bear arms.
- Opines that the right to bear arms and gun control is the most controversial amendment that has raised heated debate, among americans.
- Opines that american citizens have decided to fight for their right to gun ownership after a number of reported cases on mass shootings of innocent people.
- Opines that americans are constitutionally protected to own guns for legitimate purposes. disarming citizens does not help to curb crime, rather, it leads to an increase in crime.
- Argues that the law violates the people's constitutional right to firearm ownership, given that this right is guaranteed by the constitution.
- Opines that stricter laws to the right to bear arms will help to protect the societal needs and reduce gun related crimes.
- Argues that american citizens have a right to firearms, and this right should not be infringed. opponents argue that it will help curb violence cases by guns.
- Argues that the government should not control gun ownership to the extreme, but give them freedom town guns since it is their constitutional right.
- Concludes that the bill of rights gives americans constitutional rights like the right to bear arms, but with restrictions on how and when to use the firearms.
- Explains that guns and the constitution: a complex relation. zink, james, wilson, and winkler, adam.
992 wordsRead More - Gun Control and Banning in the USopinion essayGun Control is the topic of the report. This topic, gun control, is one of the most controversial issues with American politics today. This report will analyze gun control in our country today, as well as, evaluate whether guns should be banned. The report will include our second amendment, past and present gun control laws, key facts and reasons for having a gun. It will also cover arguments supporting gun control and arguments against gun control include the infringement on the second amendment. Valid arguments supporting gun control include decreased deaths and crime rate. Interesting survey results and interview feedback will also be covered. Lastly, the report will discuss the deadliest shootings in the United States and my recommendations on this topic. In conclusion Laws are currently in place but they are not being enforced by our government. If government is willing to enforce their laws, then citizens will abide by the laws.
In this essay, the author
- States that the report analyzes gun control in the united states and evaluates whether guns should be banned.
- Opines that gun control is a controversial topic that impacts all of us living in the united states.
- Explains that gun control is any law, policy, practice, or proposal designed to restrict or limit the possession, production, import, shipment, sale and or use of firearms.
- Explains that firearms are classified into three broad types: handgun, rifle, and shotgun. they include the revolver, pistol and derringer.
- Explains that the second amendment was passed in 1791, followed by the national firearms act in 1934, the bureau of alcohol, tobacco and fire arms in 1968, and the brady handgun violence prevention act and violent crime control
- Explains michigan's right to carry law, which requires concealed carry licensees to be at least 18 years old, have clean criminal and mental health records, and pass a written firearms safety test.
- Explains that the united states has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world, yet gun crime has actually been declining. a recent justice department survey was issued on 14,000 state prison inmates who carried a firearm during their offense.
- Opines that there are many reasons to own a gun, such as protection against crime, target shooting, hunting, and hobby collection.
- Analyzes the arguments against gun control, including the infringement on the second amendment of the constitution. the majority of gun crimes are not committed by law abiding gun owners, but by criminals.
- Interviews the gun company's owner, george, and a shelby township police officer, lietenant kovaicik.
- Describes the deadliest shootings in the united states from 4/20/99 to 12/14/12.
- Explains that the united kingdom and china ban private ownership of guns. the uk has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world.
- Concludes that gun use has three purposes: self-defense, hunting, shooting, gun collecting, and sustenance. they also recommend tighter laws to keep criminals from getting guns.
- Opines that if the government is willing to enforce their laws, the citizens will abide by the laws. gun control only restricts those who obey the law.
- Opines that the gun war will continue to be debated for years to come. everyone has a different opinion on gun control.
2161 wordsRead More - The Right to Own a Gunanalytical essayGuns, Crime, and Freedom states that, no gun law which restricts the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns has been proven to reduce crime or homicides, not even the Brady Law and the “Clinton Crime Bill.” These two laws st...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how anti-gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the name of crime prevention, an assault on the second amendment rights of us citizens.
- Explains that americans reject government intrusions on their basic civil rights, including the right of gun ownership. according to an april 18, 1994 study by penn and schoen associates, 85 percent of americans said they were unwilling to forfeit civil liberties even if it could enhance their personal safety.
- Explains that no gun law restricting the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns has been proven to reduce crime or homicides, not even the brady law and the clinton crime bill.
- Opines that more restrictions on gun ownership will not solve the "gun problem" in america. tough laws already exist to remove criminals from society and ensure that they don't have access to guns.
- Argues that criminals should be controlled, not the guns, which they share with millions of law-abiding citizens. gun control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate.
1075 wordsRead More - District of Columbia v. Heller: The Use and Permit of Handgunsanalytical essayCarter, Gregg. Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2012. Print.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that gun control laws have become a hot topic in america after the sandy hook elementary school shooting in 2012. they argue that the rigorous system violates the individual rights granted and protected by the united states constitution.
- Explains that the district of columbia v. heller is the first court case that defines who can own guns for self-defence.
- Explains that before the district of columbia v. heller, a citizen could not own guns for self-defend without some form of military background. however, the supreme court had only dealt with second amendment claims on only four times.
- Analyzes how the second amendment of the u.s constitution helps heller win his case.
- Explains that the heller case redefined the right to bear arms for self-defense, but the case did not affect the personal rights to arms at states level. mcdonald v. chicago dealt with this issue in 2010.
- Explains that mcdonald was trying to convince the court that the city of chicago had violated his constitutional right. the second amendment is fully applicable to states through the fourteenth amendment.
- Analyzes how the case of district of columbia v. heller opens a new chapter in gun ownership.
- Analyzes how the heller case plays an important role in the proposed laws about gun control. the case is a symbol for gun owners to fight against firearm restrict.
- Opines that the heller case is a symbol for gun activists and should not interfere with gun policies. the shooting between ingram and webster suggests our right to bear arms should be reconsidered.
- Narrates how charles ingram and robert webster were neighbors in florida, but friends said the two older men had little love for each other and often quarreled. on a spring day in 2010, both men pulled out their weapons.
- Explains that the heller case can strike down proposed bills on gun control, but it cannot strikedown all the bills. the case addressed the question of who could obtain and carry handgun for home defend.
- Opines that the case of district of columbia v. heller redefined the meaning of the second amendment in the twenty first century.
- Explains that guns in american society: an encyclopedia of history, politics, culture, and the law.
1536 wordsRead More - Arguments Against Gun Controlargumentative essayThe United States, the nation having the highest prevalence of private gun ownership among wealth countries over the world, imbues the private possession of guns with great social and historical significance. The Americans’ earliest attachment toward guns emerged when the nation fought for its independence. The American Revolution owed its success to the militia, people who took up arms against the British despot and served for the Continental Army. While guns represent liberty, they cause great damage and intensify violence at the same time. The misuse of guns accounts for more than 30,000 deaths per year in the United States. Recognizing the inherent dangers and staggering number of killings with handguns, the elected representatives in the
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the american revolution owed its success to the militia, which took up arms against the british despot and served for the continental army.
- Explains that handguns appeal to people who intend to commit crimes and cause an incomparable threat to the lives of the united states’ citizens.
- Explains the dangers of handguns in accidental shooting cases resulting from malfunctioning and the impulsion of the shooters are not negligible.
- Argues that the second amendment does not give individuals the right to possess guns. the framers put up armed rebellions against britain, but they did not want individuals to fight against this already better union.
- Concludes that the government has the responsibility to impose stricter restraints on handgun possession after recognizing the threats of both intentional and accidental cases.
1406 wordsRead More