Legal Writing Weaknesses

947 Words2 Pages

Legal writing became an important skill that I’ve learned to develop in the last couple of months. Wanting to become a lawyer and having no idea about the skills an aspiring lawyer must acquire was setting me up for failure. Luckily, through UWP I’ve acquire skills such as; reading court cases, drafting case briefs, and creating appellate briefs. However, 10 weeks is not enough time to gather all the writing skills needed for law school. As a result, I have identified my strengths, weaknesses, and ways to improve my legal writing skills. The standard approach of writing that’s employed by most fields of academia is composed by; an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, all put together in an essay that must meet a minimum number of pages. In contrast, legal writing has three approaches towards writing and brevity is encouraged. Brevity is practiced in legal writing because adding unnecessary words can alter the analysis, meaning, and or outcome of the case. As a result, when doing legal writing, the author must signal the reader the different components of the case with …show more content…

The biggest weakness I found in both my office memorandum and appellate brief was the analysis the issue. When analyzing an issue, the author must be constantly referring to the rules being employed to stay on track of the case. If the author doesn’t refer to the rules of the case or uses a law dictionary, the author could potentially focus on the wrong aspect of the case, thus altering the outcome. The reason why I felt the analysis was my weakness was because I often felt like I could have added more thoughts to my argument. Again, because academia teaches students that writing more is better, I felt that I could have created a stronger analysis by analyzing beyond the rules that were provided and the irrelevant facts that were given in the

Open Document