Walt Disney Conflicts

934 Words2 Pages

This case provides a brief history of management conflict and change at Walt Disney Company. Former CEO Michael Eisner was considered to be controversial because of his abrasive style and tendencies toward micromanagement. It was this style that strained several important relationships to the Disney Company. Though his reign as CEO during the 80’s and 90’s helped advance Disney Company, it was his conflicting management style that led to his demise and the beginning of Robert Iger’s epoch at Disney. Since Iger has taken the helm as CEO Disney was ranked 67th in the Fortune 500 list for largest companies, it has become the largest media conglomerate in the world, and relationships and disputes stemming from Eisner have been reconciled. …show more content…

During his 22-year tenure at Walt Disney, ex-CEO Eisner fought with the Miramax founders Harvey and Bob Weinstein over financial details relating to the purchase of Miramax. Eisner bumped heads several times with Steve Jobs who was then CEO of both Pixar and Apple Computer. The negative remarks Eisner made in front of Congress about Jobs Apple Computer was taken so personally that Jobs threatened to not renew the Disney-Pixar partnership if Eisner was still CEO of Disney. As well Eisner’s continuing disputes with Board of Director members Disney and Gold was that of disruptive behavior. For several years the long-standing board members repeatedly called for Eisner’s …show more content…

The case describes how soon after Iger took over as CEO at Disney, he reached out and reconciled relationships with the Weinstein brothers by making a settlement payment. In this instance I would argue that Iger implemented a problem solving approach. The Weinstein brothers may have received a payment of $100 million but Disney kept the Miramax name and film library worth $2 billion. It would appear that the brothers got what they thought was fair payment and Disney kept a lucrative business asset. Iger also reconciled relationships with Steve Jobs and Pixar by adding Jobs to the Disney Board of Directors. By adding Jobs to the board of directors not only did Iger add another influential and successful member to the team but also assured the acquisition of Pixar Animation Studios. This venture was an integrative (or win-win) negotiation for both Iger and Jobs. As stated in our reading, “when conflicting parties truly collaborate, this can result in a merger of insight, experience, knowledge, and perspective that leads to higher-quality solutions than would be obtained by any other approach.” In both of these conflicts the needs of all involved were

Open Document