Ulysses S. Grant versus Robert ELee

635 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ulysses s grant robert e lee compare and contrast

Both Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee were men of integrity, determination, passion and great skill. This is where their similarities end as Lee’s empowerment ideology differed from that of Grant’s aristocratic beliefs. Bruce Catton wrote about the two men in the essay, “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”. Catton, a Pulitzer Prize winning author and Civil War Historian, provides a brief character analysis of both men in this essay. The beliefs that Grant embraced as a frontiersman was more admirable than those aristocratic beliefs of Lee, and more men and women of today should understand and follow Grant’s principles. Social inequality was one of the fundamental differences between the two men. Lee was an aristocrat who believed in traditional chivalry. This belief had become historically antiquated because America became the land of change. In America, the aristocratic society was slowly being replaced by an industrious and forward thinking society. (Catton 429) He also believed in the establishment and the maintenance of a clear cut social order between each class of individual. Catton wrote, “In such a land Lee stood for the feeling that it was somehow of advantage to human society to have a pronounced inequality in the social structure” (429). In contrast, Grant believed that everyone had the opportunity to succeed in society and that everyone had the same opportunities. Catton wrote, “No man was born to anything, except perhaps to a chance to show how far he could rise. Life was a competition” (430). The societal differences between the two men gave insight into how each perceived the future of the States. Lee believed that landowners played a key role in determining the success of the country. He believed that this socia... ... middle of paper ... ...holly realized, in the years to come, but which did, in the end, help the two sections to become one nation again . . . after a war whose bitterness might have seemed to make such a reunion wholly impossible” (431). Though General Lee’s passion and ambition was admirable, the forward thinking that was embraced by General Grant is how society should live today. Visionaries with the passion of providing a better opportunity for us, as a nation, is a mindset that needs to be embraced by everyone. This forward thinking had been essential in the development of this nation and needs to become a priority to the men and women of today in order for our country to further succeed. Works Cited Catton, Bruce. “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts.” Readings for Writers. 13th Ed. Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell and Anthony C. Winkler. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning, 2011. 428-31. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Comparing The North And The South In Michael Shaara's The Killer Angels

    651 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nevertheless, an attitude they show is their cause for engaging in the war. On page 110, Lee describes, “With every step of a soldier, with every tick of the clock, the army was gaining safety, closer to victory, closer to the dream of independence.” His words reveal that their reason for coming was to gain their long overdue independence. Without a cause worth fighting for on each side, the war would have no fuel or reason to continue. In like manner, another attitude of the South was their admiration for their commander general. On page 251, Longstreet proclaims, “Colonel, let me explain something. The secret of General Lee is that men love him and follow him with faith in him. That’s one secret.” I believe this clarifies that the bond of brotherhood and respect for each other in this army would allow for these soldiers to follow their leader blindly. The overwhelming amount of faith and trust among the Army of the Northern Virginia is inspiring. The Confederates prove in these appearances that they do indeed have an important cause that they are willing to die

    Read More

  • Comparing Neat People Vs. Sloppy People, By Suzanne Britt

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    Grant and Robert E. Lee. Catton states, “Lee was tidewater Virginia, and in his background were family, culture, and tradition…the age of chivalry transplanted to a New World which was making its own legends and its own myths” (par.5). Here, Catton uses historical facts to describe the type of person Lee was, explaining that he was a traditional kind of man. Then Catton states, “Grant, the son of a tanner on the Western frontier, was everything Lee was not. He had come up the hard way, and embodied nothing in particular except the eternal toughness and sinewy fiber of the men who grew up beyond the mountains” (par. 7). The author describes the type of man Grant was; a tough man who had to earn everything himself. Bruce Catton uses historical facts about Lee and Grant so the reader can have a better insight about the variations between the two

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Grant And Lee By Bruce Catton

    249 Words  | 1 Pages

    The essay, “Grant and Lee” written by Bruce Catton presented an exceptional portrait of two patriots serving under a different flag, but fighting the same war. The war tested the ideology of the two men; especially with Lee upholding the aristocracy of the South and Grant shouldering the North under his command. Furthermore, the Civil war served as the test for the nation to keep people from deteriorating since the founding of America in 1776 after the revolutionary war. The men share a common interest of serving their country even if they go against each other.

    Read More

  • Role of Ulysses S. Grant in the American Civil War

    1199 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marrin, Albert. Unconditional Surrender: U.S. Grant and the Civil War. New York, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994. Print.

    Read More

  • Atticus vs. Grant

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the novels, Atticus and Grant showed many similarities and differences. Atticus, being well educated and white, got him a lot of respect. Likewise grant was educated but since he was black, people did not have respect for him. Grant and Atticus were both entrusted to big responsibilities in their novels. They shared a big difference for their time as well, that was Grant being black and Atticus being white. In the 1930s, it was the colour of their skin that people were judged by, so even though Grant and Atticus are very similar, people in that time would say that they are very different. In conclusion, Atticus and grant showed that they are both similar and different as they were both well educated, they were entrusted to big responsibilities, and they both live their lives differently due to their age and race.

    Read More

  • Analysis of For Cause and Comrades

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    The book ‘For Cause and Comrades’ is a journey to comprehend why the soldiers in the Civil War fought, why they fought so passionately, and why they fought for the long period of time. Men were pulling guns against other men who they had known their whole lives. McPherson’s main source of evidence was the many letters from the soldiers writing to home. One of the many significant influences was how the men fought to prove their masculinity and courage. To fight would prove they were a man to their community and country. Fighting also had to do with a duty to their family. Ideology was also a major motivating factor; each side thought they were fighting for their liberty. The soldier’s reputations were created and demolished on the battlefield, where men who showed the most courage were the most honored. Religion also played an important role because the second Great Awakening had just occurred. Their religion caused the men who thought of themselves as saved to be fearless of death, “Religion was the only thing that kept this soldier going; even in the trenches…” (McPherson, p. 76) R...

    Read More

  • A Comparison Of Stonewall Jackson And Robert E. Lee

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee are best known for their careers in leading the Confederate Army. Few people know anything about them beyond battles fought and wars lost. History is written by the victors, and the victors have essentially extinguished all perceived importance of these two fallen leaders. However, both were not only soldiers fighting for a lost cause, but also educators. Both taught many of those who would fight alongside and against them in the war that ripped the United States of America in half. While the two had similar backgrounds and military careers, their careers in education were vastly different.

    Read More

  • What They Fought For by James McPherson's

    558 Words  | 2 Pages

    In James McPherson’s novel, What They Fought For, a variety of Civil War soldier documents are examined to show the diverse personal beliefs and motives for being involved in the war. McPherson’s sample, “is biased toward genuine fighting soldiers” (McPherson, 17) meaning he discusses what the ordinary soldier fought for. The Confederacy was often viewed as the favorable side because their life style relied on the war; Confederates surrounded their lives with practices like slavery and agriculture, and these practices were at stake during the war. On the other hand, Northerners fought to keep the country together. Although the Civil War was brutal, McPherson presents his research to show the dedication and patriotism of the soldiers that fought and died for a cause.

    Read More

  • Ulysses S. Grant

    1117 Words  | 3 Pages

    A military genius, Grant possessed the vision to see that modern warfare requires total application of military and economic strength and was thus able to lead the Union to victory. In civilian life, however, he was unable to provide the leadership necessary for a growing industrial nation, even though he always retained the affection of the American public.

    Read More

  • Robert E. Lee

    1415 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, there have been people whose names and faces have become synonymous with the time periods in which they lived. For example, Julius Caesar is synonymous with the late Roman Republic and George Washington is synonymous with the American Revolution. Just like these two men, the name Robert E. Lee has become synonymous with the American Civil War. Not only did Lee rise to become the most important and recognizable person in the Southern Confederacy, but his honor and virtuous acts during and after the war made him a hero to modern-day Americans. Even though he fought for what many consider the morally erroneous side of the war, the virtues of his character have made him a figure in American history that should be honored and remembered.

    Read More

  • How Did Robert E Lee Impact On War

    438 Words  | 1 Pages

    After the war Lee was charged with being too bloody-minded, of fighting even when Lee knew that the fight was a lost cause. Lee was the president of the Washington College after the war (“Robert E. Lee”). “In the history of the world, perhaps no general who failed so often has been so revered” (“Robert E.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And A Raison In The Sun

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    Malcom X once said: "If you're not ready to die for it, put 'freedom' out of your vocabulary". Malcom X was a civil rights leader during the 1960's where African Americans were being treated horrible. During this time a woman be the name of Lorraine Hansberry wrote a play called A Raison In The Sun, a refinance to a poem named A Dream Deferred by Langston Hughes. In the play there is a character named Walter Lee Younger who is having trouble with his family. Walter Lee and Malcom a different on how they started at the beginning of their stories and the change they went through at the end, but the cause of that change is very similar. Both Walter Lee and Malcom started off being selfish but at the end became better people.

    Read More

  • The True American Hero

    1333 Words  | 3 Pages

    Grant remained a child at heart throughout his life, and seems never to have realized that he was one. His faith in the goodness of humanity was unbounded, and he was taken advantage of. His simplicity of nature was remarkable, yet this simplicity was the mainspring of his success; certainly it was the first asset of his generalship. While McClellan could see nothing beyond his own operations and Halleck nothing outside of his textbooks, Grant saw things as they were, uncontaminated by his ideas or anyone elses. He saw that the entire problem of winning the civil war was nothing more than an equation between pressure and resistance. The side which pressed the hardest along the lines of least resistance was going to win.

    Read More

  • Robert E Lee

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    General Lee knows that we have inexperienced men and aims at improving the quality of the troops. He upgrades the quality by tightening command and discipline, improving morale, and convincing the soldiers that the confederacy was in full command of the situation. Lee knew that we are lacking, and devised initiatives to nullify the Union’s superiority in manpower, armaments, and supply by destroying their prearranged plans.

    Read More

  • Modernism: Hills Like White Elephants, by Ernest Hemingway

    1592 Words  | 4 Pages

    and Other Greats : Lessons from the All-star Writer's Workshop. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006. Print.

    Read More

More about Ulysses S. Grant versus Robert ELee

Open Document