The Two Kinds of Evil According to Augustine

1275 Words3 Pages

God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, which makes us wonder what kind of morally sufficient reason justifies God to allow evil. We know that evil exists in our world, but so does God, so would God be the source of evil as well as good? We have established that God is the omnipotent and benevolent free creator of the world, but suffering and evil exist. Is God unable to prevent evil? If so, he would not be omnipotent. Is He able to prevent the evil in our world but unwilling? If this were then case then he wouldn’t be benevolent. A Persian thinker, Mani, suggested that the answer to this question was a kind of duality between the good and evil. This pluralistic view of the good and evil in our world would suggest that God is not omnipotent, which is why Augustine would reject Mani’s Manichaeism philosophy. Augustine later says that there are two kinds of evils: Moral evil, which would be the suffering from a result of the action of a rational being, and there is natural evil, which would be suffering that comes from physical events (i.e. natural disasters).

In De Libero Arbitrio Book I, Augustine states that Evil has no teacher, so when people do evil, they are the cause of their own suffering. The question then becomes, did we learn how to sin? Augustine would say that learning is classified as a good and therefore, we do not learn evil. Augustine states, teaching produces understanding , which would make understanding a good, and if understanding is good then a person who understands eternal law/morals will do good, therefore, evil cannot be taught because it does not produce true understanding of the eternal law . In order to move forward through Augustine’s argument it is important to understand what is conside...

... middle of paper ...

...paths fit. They are automatically predetermined to live without God’s grace because He knows their true nature through his omniscience. They are bound to temporal desires through their self-centeredness and inability to understand moral codes on an objective level. In other words, they are unable to live by eternal law because they cannot understand a being with a higher authority than them.

Works Cited

Arragel, Moses, A. Paz Y Meliá, Julián Paz, and Alba, Jacobo Stuart Fitz-James Y Falcó. Bible (Old Testament). Madrid: Priv. Print. for Presentation to the Members of the Roxburghe Club, 1918. Print.

Augustine. On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010. Print.

Peter King. On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010. Print.

Open Document