Structural Competency In Mental Health

1115 Words3 Pages

Structural competence
One of the things I like about this class is that I got to understand what structural competence is. On my view, structural competence refers to the trained ability of understanding how structural factors affect the wellbeing of an individual. These factors can be systematic, physical, political or even founded on beliefs and language. Structural competence is also about understanding and distinguishing the difference between structural forces and individual factors. For example, a doctor that is structural competent will not only see a person’s illness outside of his control, but will look at his socioeconomic status, like his environment or place of dwelling. Moreover, structural competence also capacitates people
Being a psychology major, I know the effects and consequences that mental health can carry for individuals. However, after taking many psychological classes at Berkeley, I found that the psychological definition on mental illness barely represent or fulfill to what people experience in the United states. In other words, I found that psychologists in America tended to emphasize on the biology of people, without focusing on their upbringing or their society. In addition, I also notice that instead of removing stigmas, many psychology and psychological research aggravated the problem by diagnosing people on the accounts of race, gender or status. That said, I found that structural competence pushed me to take the political aspect of mental illness. For example, I envision myself, not only advocating for the rights of people with mental illness, but also stopping with stigmas and discrimination. In fact, especially in the US, stigmas on the mentally ill can be dangerous because the more people that suffer from stigmatization, the less likely they will find a home, a job or achieve personal good health. In particular, stigmas can be worrisome to people suffering from mental health if the criminal justice gets involve because people gets incarcerated into prisons for having a mental illness instead of getting the treatment they need. Thus, I envision myself making political statements about people managing
The social security program is part of our social insurance model that provides people with disabilities, retiring or without employment with cash and other in kind- benefits. Thus, I think that this policy is effective in promoting wellness in our society because it’s a stable framework, it is not means tested and tries to provide for the welfare of people without running on a private or neoliberal agenda. In other words, because the social security is universal and its run by the government, the OASIS program makes sure that all people, at least those qualify, get the means to survive. On the other hand, the social assistance program is not as effective as the social insurance model because it is means tested, its unstable and created many bureaucratic red tapes for people in need of assistance. One policy especially that affected me is the Medicaid. The Medicaid is a social assistance program that tries to provide free universal healthcare to people that are low- income, with disabilities or under the age of 21. However, the program instead of promoting wellness to low-income people, they put them through inefficient services and inadequate health care system that only affects low income people at the long run. For example, just to get an appointment, I had to enrolled myself in a waiting list that took 1 month for me to get check out. In

Open Document