The Strange Case Of Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde Analysis

1067 Words3 Pages

Discuss the significance of a biblical text or theme in Robert Louis Stevenson, The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. In this essay, I will explore the ways in which The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a presentation of the drama of sin on the human condition. This inter-textual relationship has long been acknowledged by scholars including McAfee in his study bible, who wrote that 'Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is only [Stevenson 's] way of putting into modern speech Paul 's old distinction between the two men who abide in each of us ' (McAfee 1912, 178). I will further argue that through the novel 's conclusion, Stevenson invites his readers to confront the unsatisfactory conclusion of the Pauline discourse on sin found in Romans …show more content…

Bland 's book aims to expound the culture in which Stevenson found himself writing, going on to argue that Stevenson 's writings are influenced by a Darwinism which precludes a "fall" but yet he equally draws on the poetic insights into humanity found in the bible. Bland fails to appreciate the nuanced synthesis of Darwinism with a religion which Stevenson himself describes as 'centred on the little rough-and-tumble world ' (Bland 2009, 15). This synthesis is part of Stevenson 's impetus to put into modern speech the writings of Paul; for him, the apishness descriptions of Hyde is the sign of Jekyll fallen nature. In this reading, when Adam and Eve fell, they did not 'be as gods ' (Gen 3:5) as the serpent promised, but became like the beasts. So, Darwin 's theories provided a vivid, modern image of the origin of humanity which Stevenson used to illustrate humanities fallen origin story in Genesis …show more content…

However, it is also helpful to acknowledge the role of the reader in understanding of the text . The reader of Stevenson 's novel is given various clues as to the relationship between Jekyll and Hyde, such that, as the story develops their understanding that these two characters might be a single person is formed. Yet, by the end of the book, many questions remain unanswered and thus the novel 'brings to light the puzzling fecundity of the self ' (Mills 2004, 338). Similar questions remain at Paul 's remarkable expression, 'that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I ' (Rom 7:8, KJV). If these sinful actions are not willed by Paul, then where does responsibility lie? Likewise, the reader of Stevenson is left asking questions of the true nature and identity of Dr. Jekyll, as well as questioning his culpability for those crimes of Mr

Open Document