A Critical Analysis Of Freud's Psychodynamic Theory

708 Words2 Pages

Explain Yourself! #1: Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory

I’m resistant to changes in my life. I avoid trying new things because I’m afraid I will dislike them. At the simplest form of resistance is food, however, there are more serious matters that I’m also resistant to such as people’s suggesting on how I should behave. I often deny food recommendations and disregard people’s opinion and suggestions on appropriate methods for life improvements. Freud would find this to be a valuable trait to study, considering the fact resistance can be motivated by the unconscious mind. In this essay, I will allow Freud to analyze me by utilizing his personality theory. My resistance towards life changes might be eventually identified as an expression of power and control. For the readers benefit, I will first touch base on Freud’s most relevant structures; describe the process by which each structure produces certain behaviors; and the process by which my particular behavior interacts with those structures. Lastly, I will critique the value of Freud’s theory by examining how helpful it was in explaining my resistance towards change.
In his theory, there are three developmental stages that are strongly emphasized; oral, anal, and the phallic stage. These developmental stages divide children into different developmental categories by …show more content…

More so, children who get too little or too much gratification at any given stage of development will become fixated, unable to move past that stage’s instincts. A person who is fixated at a particular stage of development would adopt an oral, anal, or phallic personality type in efforts to gratify that stage’s instincts in later adulthood. An oral personality characteristic would manifest itself with security issues, while an anal personality characteristic would be power issues, and lastly a phallic personality characteristic would be sexuality

Open Document