Deterrence Essay

833 Words2 Pages

All beings with a sense of understanding learn how to make choices, even in its smallest measurement, they also learn of consequences to those choices. Children, for example, have been told countless times to stop a certain behavior because they may hurt themselves. Some children heed their parent’s warming’s while others continue down a path that usually ends with a painful lesson but the originating act is usually not repeated. Why can this not be the same for adults? Generally it is understood that a person will make a choice or take an action based on the possible outcomes or consequences. Combining the notions of decision making with criminal behavior, one would find that a path has been made to the idea of deterrence. Kubrin, Stucky, and Krohn (2009) explain that deterrence encompasses the ideas that an individual will weigh his or her options in reference to a criminal act and will make a choice based on the perceived risks. Those perceived risks are consequences or fears of being punished. …show more content…

People who engage in criminal behavior weigh the possible risks of consequences against the possible gain in rewards. What really tips the scale in this gamble of criminal behavior is the certainty and severity of punishment (Kubrin, Stucky, and Krohn 2009). There can be a problem with this idea, are those who commit illegal acts rational thinkers? The theorem for deterrence and rational choice consists of the following: the guarantee of punishment could lower criminal behavior, the severity of consequences will also reduce criminal acts, and swift discipline will avert further criminal behavior from offenders (Kubrin, Stucky, and Krohn

Open Document