Mencius And Aquinas Analysis

894 Words2 Pages

Lee Yearley, the Religious Studies professor of Stanford University, works mainly in comparative religious ethics and poetics. His focus is particularly on materials from China and the West. For example, both his book Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage (abbreviated as Mencius and Aquinas below) and Journal Virtues and Religious Virtues in the Confucian Tradition discuss the field of early Chinese thoughts as well as relating Chinese cultures with western religions.
First of all, both his book and journal offer basic religious background of Confucianism, Daoism, and Christianity. In the book Mencius and Aquinas, before fully discussing about the connection and differences between Mencius and Aquinas, Yearley first …show more content…

Roetz Heiner who wrote a book review of Mencius and Aquinas argued: “To compare Mencius and Aquinas seems prima facie a queer undertaking. Are they not inconceivably different in their overall perspectives, their cultural and religious context, and in the ways they present their philosophies? Lee H. Yearley himself repeatedly points out the striking dissimilarities between the two thinkers” (Heiner 174). Recognizing that religious expressions of human beings are neither all the same nor all different, Yearley states that his book will map “part of the middle ground between the same and the different” for it sill chart “similarities within differences and differences within similarities” and thus “discuss the normative conclusions the process produces” (Yearley 24). His opening chapter outlines the general differences and similarities between Mencius and Aquinas; e.g. propriety (li), fate (ming), and attention (ssu) are lacking in Aquinas; revelation, church, or sacraments are not found in Mencius. He relates such a “comparative philosophy of religions” to three areas of ethics; injunctions, lists of virtues arranged in a hierarchical order, and ways or forms of life “protected by the injunctions and picked out by the virtues. Yearley describes the contexts for the ideas of virtue of Mencius and Aquinas, which …show more content…

Although these two ideologies seem to be completely irrelevant, Yearley connects them with one characteristic that the two religions have – they both emphasizes the relationship between people’s daily lives and sacred beliefs. In his journal, Yearley claims that the heaven and human mortal world are substantially interrelated. Divinity does not contradict with or break worldly living environment, but completes it and vise versa. In other words, human virtues are accompanied by religious virtues. Believing in particular religion does not replace people’s original daily life, but greatly improves

More about Mencius And Aquinas Analysis

Open Document