Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to control air pollution essay
How to control air pollution essay
How to control air pollution essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How to control air pollution essay
The economic impact of current approaches to controlling air pollution is emissions taxes and most effective are marginal abatement. These are penalties that in percentage to the quantity an industry release into an air shed, local landfill, or waterway. The most effective control approaches are implemented into a regulatory policy with execution time limit and mechanisms for enforcement. There are differences in control measures that mandate through altered levels of régime of provincial (city, county), national, regional and state. Air pollution regulations established at the domestic level ensure the most advantage while minimizing margin, competitive and competition emphases. A requirement of the Environmental Protection Agency is citing manufacturing facilities that may well introduce pollutants in the air or public waters. It is effective since the Environment Protection Agency works strictly with state and local governments in its pollution control efforts. State and local governments pass its individual laws and regulations which meet or surpass requirements of federal laws as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, and CERCLA. Environment Protection Agency watches over the state's enforcement activities. It provides support to state officials and participates directly in major enforcement actions against violators of ecological regulations. “Environment Protection Agency (EPA) works with other federal environmental control agencies, which requires other federal agencies to pursue environmentally sound policies and prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) before undertaking any major action which significantly affect the environment.” (EPA, pp.25-26, 1989-1991)The objective for each control approach is towards ... ... middle of paper ... ...vative product development. Regulation is a compromise of conflicting public and industry interest as well as bureaucratic/ governmental objectives, which generates a consequence of deregulation rather erratic. Works Cited EPA. (1989-1991). Securing Our Legacy: An EPA Progress Report 1989-1991 . Retrieved from Environmental Protection Agency: www.epa.gov McEachern, W. (2012). Econ - Micro. In W. McEachern, Econ - Micro (pp. 27-30). Mason: Cengage Learning. whitehouse.gov. (2014, January 8). Reducing Air Pollution: Cleaning up Toxic Air Pollution. Retrieved from The White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/our-environment yosemite.epa.gov. (2010, December). Regulatory and Non-Regulatory Approaches to Pollution Control. Retrieved from Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0568-04.pdf/$file/EE-0568-04.pdf
City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department. “L.A. Made a Difference!” Los Angeles, CA: US. 1998. www.cityofla.org/EAD/article3.htm
The Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA is the result of a 1970 executive order by President Richard Nixon for the purpose of protecting the environment of the United States through regulation on business and citizens. Public opinion on the Environmental Protection Agency has been divided fairly evenly across the population of the United States as of recently, as compared to the widespread public concern of the 50’s and 60’s that led to the agency’s creation. Recently the agency has come under scrutiny for its contributions of millions of dollars in grants to researchers in order to hide the potential trade off of its actions in order to further the agency’s agenda. The EPA’s ever-expanding regulation could end up harming more than it actually
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates air pollution through various policies passed through the Supreme Court. The scope of this paper is to investigate the Clean Air Act of 1970, and to analyze the impact it has on businesses and society. It provides a rationale for the policy, and contains a brief overview of governmental involvement in regulating air pollution. Further investigation identifies key stakeholders in business, government, and society, and assesses the pros and cons of regulating air pollution. Finally, the paper concludes with limitations of this analysis and recommendations for future action.
Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Protection Agency, (Nov 2011). Caa national enforcement programs. Retrieved from website: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/civil/caa/caaenfprog.html
US Enviromental Protection Agency. (2010, December 13). Retrieved January 20, 2011, from US EPA Human Health: http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/index.cfm?fuseaction=list.listByChapter&ch=49
One of the consequences of regulation not captured by measuring its direct cost (administration and compliance) is the severe limits it can impose on people's freedom to make their own choices based on their individual circumstances and tolerance for risk. Government regulation also dampens innovation, delays development of products, stifles entrepreneurship, restricts competition, and slows growth of productivity.
There was a concern that industries would not be able to perform as well or meet the requirements demanded by Congress. The fear that the economy would suffer under strict environmental regulations never came to be. Since the introduction of the Clean Air Act of 1970, “aggregate emissions of common air pollutants dropped 68 percent, while the U.S. gross domestic product grew 212 percent. Total private sector jobs increased by 88 percent during the same period” (Clean Air Act and Economy). There is a cornucopia of reasons as to why the U.S. has benefitted from the Clean Air Act: environmental costs are a small percentage of industry revenues, cleaner technologies have made the U.S. a global market leader, more people can work because they are healthier, less money spent on illness, increase in employment and increased revenues… (Clean Air Act and Economy). It is clear that strict pollution laws do not harm the
Case Study - Corporate Obstacles to Pollution Prevention. Overview This case focuses on corporate obstacles to pollution prevention. Pollution prevention can be complex, especially for large corporations. There are many different forms of pollution prevention, including emissions control devices and incremental changes in existing technology.
The Criminal Process in Environmental Regulation. (n.d.). UH Law. Retrieved April 6, 2014, from http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/thester/courses/Environmental-Practicum-2014/syllabus/chap6.pdf
Pollution is a major problem for all of us. People need to recognize this situation so we can start making a difference to this problem. In order to start making a difference, the federal government should increase gasoline tax by one dollar a gallon. Fifty percent of this dollar will go towards public transportation, since passenger cars and trucks are a major contribution towards air pollution, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, E.P.A (10/4, http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/emsns.html). Due to the expected increase after this is put forth, the remaining fifty percent of the dollar will go towards safety on these transits. When public transportation increases, air pollution will decrease, which will lessen the harmful health risks towards the environment.
One of the most dangerous environment issues Southern California is facing today is air pollution. This includes the burning of fossil fuels and natural disasters. Los Angeles is one of the most polluted cities in the world, and the most polluted city in the United States. I will research information about the causes, the effects, and the history of air pollution in the Los Angeles. For my research, I have relied mostly on, the school’s database and library, as well as current events.
Our Congress created the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 in order to establish an environmental foundation for mankind. This policy endorses harmony between humans and the vast ecosystems surrounding them. To obtain this goal and provide our future with resources as well, NEPA is separated into two titles. The first title declares the policy in detail while the second title focuses on the Council on Environmental Quality. The CEQ oversees the effectiveness of current methods, the reactions of the environment to those methods, and implements revisions as necessary.
PURPOSE: To persuade my audience that we must take action now to control air pollution
"What YOU Can Do to Prevent NPS Pollution." Home. EPA, n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.
"Recycling | Reduce, Reuse, Recycle | US EPA." US Environmental Protection Agency. Web. 06 Dec. 2011. .