Analysis Of Nietzsche's Division Between Master And Slave Morality

963 Words2 Pages

In this essay, I will be presenting Nietzsche 's division between master and slave morality. First, I will present in detail what master mortality and slave mortality is. Second, I will present the steps of transitioning between the two. I will conclude with why Nietzsche sees this to be a problem for humanity.

Nietzsche describes two types of people on different ends of the spectrum, the higher of the two being masters. Master morality is associated with being good, powerful, wealthy, and pure. Having master morality means someone is more wealthy than another, more noble than another, and better than their counter parts. On the other end of the spectrum, slave morality is associated with being bad, weak, poor, and impure. There are different traits associated with both sides, for example, masters are considered wealthy, but corrupt; while slaves are considered kind, but weak. Unless a person has reached the state of master morality they will never be as good as those who have, to understand how to make that transition, we must understand which traits are considered good and which traits are considered bad.

A trait many people may believe is a positive trait to have is the ability to feel empathy for others, basically feel sorry for them in an attempt to understand their misfortune. According to Nietzsche, having empathy is a negative virtue, his …show more content…

For example, being that purity is considered to be a trait of the masters, it is considered a good thing to be pure. To be a virgin an individual must fight the urge to have sex, however sexual feelings are a natural part of a human being. Therefore, being pure means to deny yourself of your true desires, which in turn causes you to suffer. By critiquing morality, we learn many things considered to be "good" are the opposite, which leads to why Nietzsche saw master and slave morality as a negative thing for humanity as a

Open Document