Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature/nurture debate
Nature vs. nurture debate
Nature vs. nurture debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature/nurture debate
With each passing moment, with each tick of the second hand on a clock, humans learn more about themselves and the natural world that surrounds them. In the past, knowledge was not always based on fact. Rather observation and cultural and religious influences dictated schools of thought. Over two thousand years ago, in the years between 460-377 B.C., ancient Greek physician and philosopher Hippocrates, developed the humoral theory of medicine. A theory that would shepard medicine for the next two millennia. It wasn’t until the beginning of the seventeenth century that English physician William Harvey, would radically reform the understanding of the human body. Although both Harvey and Hippocrates were concerned with the nature and function …show more content…
Hippocrates was concerned with the external observation of the body and disease, while Harvey was intrigued with the inner workings of the human anatomy. “The Nature of Man” was the Hippocratic text in which Hippocrates introduced the humoral theory of medicine. This theory, revolved around the idea that the body was composed of four humors - phlegm, yellow bile, black bile, and blood, and that the balance and position of these humors determined one’s state of health. Hippocrates explained that “pain occurs when one of the substances presents either a deficiency or an excess, or [when] it is separated from the body and does not mix with the others” (43). The pain is experienced both from the site where the humor was discharged as well as where the substance originated internally. Hippocrates expressed that the four humors are always present in the body, but the amount of each substance is related to the time of year. He understood that the body was influenced by, and reflected its, external environment. Like the seed of a tree soaking up the contents of soil, the body, to some extent, absorbs what is in …show more content…
Consumed by the mystery of how blood was moved throughout the body, Harvey meticulously dissected dozens of animals and examined countless cadavers to feed his curious mind. Harvey was a pioneer in the field and his findings refuted many popular beliefs on human anatomy at the time. He made four very important discoveries. The first, blood is circulated throughout the body in a recycling process. Harvey calculated the heart pumped “8,460 ounces [of blood] per hour” . This “forced [him] to conclude that the heart does not continually produce new blood but rather circulates or “recycles” it” (68). The Second, blood contains air. For many years it was believed that “arteries contained blood and blood alone, neither air nor spirits”, yet when Harvey cut off the access to air to the pulmonary vein in a dog but allowed for an incision to be made so that air entered the lungs, the beast could not survive. The evidence proved that air is somehow transmitted through the pulmonary vein to the heart. The third discovery was the pulse is not produced by the arteries pulling blood in, but rather by blood being pushed by the heart into the arteries, enlarging them. Harvey’s final major discovery was there are no vessels in the heart’s septum. All of the blood in the right ventricle goes to the lungs and then through the pulmonary veins to the left ventricle Similarly,
In 1615 at the age of 37 Harvey became the Lumleian Lecture specializing in Surgery. William Harvey discovered his finding of the Circulation of Blood by ignoring medical textbooks and dissecting animals. He gained all or most of his learnings from observations of cutting open veins and arteries of living animals. Many people of this modern time thought because there weren’t any anesthetics that Harvey was cruel for cutting open living animals. I think that if it wasn’t for William Harvey and all of his studies and dissections that we wouldn’t be able to learn teach and save as many people as we can today. We as people have learned a lot from the many studies and dissections throughout Harvey’s lifetime. We have learned that blood, arteries, and veins are all within the same origin, blood in the arteries sent to the tissues are not stay there, the body‘s circulation mechanism was designed for the movement of liquid and that blood carrying air is still blood, the heart moves all movements of blood not the liver, hearts contract the same time as the pulse is felt, ventricle’s squeeze blood into main arteries, the pulse is formed by blood being pushed into arteries making them bigger, there are no vessels in the heart’s septum, lastly there is no to in from of blood in the veins there is only
All the knowledge these doctors knew was based on: Humour, what brain function each internal organ controls, and how to protect themselves from it. Furthermore, the basic knowledge all these doctors knew was: There are only four elements in the world, each element represented a humour, and all four humours are balanced in the human body. Humours are “natural bodily fluids”. They correspond to the elements and have various qualities: cold, dry, hot, and moist.” (Ross)
...ng symptoms”. The use of physiology hadn’t exactly transformed society, but it opened up new doors for the study of human behavior.
Although he lived four centuries before the birth of Christ, a man named Hippocrates recorded the symptoms of diseases we still see to this day. Known as the “Father of Medicine” (Hippocrates), Hippocrates was an ancient physician who studied and recorded his observances of the body’s infections and physiology. He set forth the foundation for future physicians, and in doing so, is accredited for our knowledge of infectious diseases in earlier centuries. During this time however, many believed the earth and its inhabitants were composed of four general elements: air, water, fire, and dirt. They also believed that any one person who fell ill was being punished by the gods. As a foresighted thinker though, Hippocrates encouraged the idea that humans became ill due to natural causes. In that wisdom, he recorded all his observances of his patients and their illnesses, taking careful note of the bodily symptoms and their progression.
Kleinman, Arthur M. “What Kind of Model for the Anthropology of Medical Systems?” American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 80, No. 3 (Sep, 1978), pp. 661-665.
The heart serves as a powerful function in the human body through two main jobs. It pumps oxygen-rich blood throughout the body and “blood vessels called coronary arteries that carry oxygenated blood straight into the heart muscle” (Katzenstein and Pinã, 2). There are four chambers and valves inside the heart that “help regulate the flow of blood as it travels through the heart’s chambers and out to the lungs and body” (Katzenstein Pinã, 2). Within the heart there is the upper chamber known as the atrium (atria) and the lower chamber known as the ventricles. “The atrium receive blood from the lu...
Dr. David KL Quek. Is the Hippocratic Tradition Still Relevant in Today’s Medical Practice. http://www.vadscorner.com/editorial 10199.html 27 Nov. 2004
In modern medicine when an ailment arises it can be quickly diagnosed, attributed to a precise bacteria, virus, or body system, and treated with medication, surgery or therapy. During the time before rational medical thought, this streamlined system of treatment was unheard of, and all complaints were attributed to the will of the multitude of commonly worshiped Greek gods (Greek Medicine 1). It was during the period of Greek rationalism that a perceptible change in thought was manifested in the attitudes towards treating disease. Ancient Greece is often associated with its many brilliant philosophers, and these great thinkers were some of the first innovators to make major developments in astrology, physics, math and even medicine. Among these academics was Hippocrates, one of the first e...
Doctors believed the human body was part of the universe, so they used elements for each humour, “Yellow bile was the equivalent of fire. Phlegm was the equivalent of water. Black bile was the equivalent of earth and blood was the equivalent of air”(“Shakespearean and Elizabethan Medicine”). Also, because of their beliefs and lack of knowledge on serious medical conditions, most severe cases were not treated accurately. Some doctors believed if a person broke a bone, then it was never supposed to be used again because the accident was based from many sins of the soul (“Shakespearean and Elizabethan Medicine”).
Wrong theories of the anatomy have been assumed to be correct for thousands of years. Theories of using a scientific base were not used by the Europeans until the Renaissance period (“Medicine”). These theories, made by a Greek Physician named Galen, were supported by the Catholic Church. The Middle Ages were a difficult time to achieve medical advances because Galen’s theories were not to be questioned or tested(“The Impact of the Renaissance on Medicine”).Even after these theories appeared to be inaccurate, the support from such a high authority made it extremely difficult to change the medical practices and training(“Rennaissance medicine”).
Hippocrates used his knowledge of natural healing to help many people recover from what ails them in an attempt to; also, learn more of people’s sicknesses. Hippocrates once thoroughly examined the king of Macedonia, who was very sick at the time, and aided him in “recovering from tuberculosis”- which he did recover from (World Biography, 4).
At the turn of the nineteenth century, medicine was hardly the enlightened profession it is today. Medical practices were often barbaric, employing methods that had been used for centuries, yielding little or no results and often killing the patient with a different affliction than the original ailment. Leeching (or blood letting), purgation, poor liquid diets, and cold water dousing were common practices as late as the 1850's. Even after newer, more effective methods of medical treatment had been introduced, many of the physicians, surgeons, and apothecaries hesitated to use them. Fearing the loss of their reputations, they hung on to superstitious beliefs, doubting the effectiveness of su...
Concepts from Daoism, Confucianism, and other schools of Chinese thought found their way into the philosophy and theory of medicine. "Qi, for example, which meant air or breath, ca...
While it is easy to stand back and scorn the subjectivity of the ancient Greeks’ medical practices and laugh at their notions of human anatomy, it is important to recognize that all “science” has a degree of cultural influence. It is true that their sweet and sour pessaries, cures of sex, and anatomical understanding that was based on “Love” would be ridiculous in the modern western society, but rather than view their methods as “bad science,” we can use them as a rich source for discovering cultural values. Love was at the center of their science of healing, and this shows us that it was not an isolated phenomenon in Greek society, but enveloped all aspects of life – spiritual, emotional and physical.
Hippocrates, often called the “father of medicine” was one of the earliest contributors to modern science. He was called the father of medicine because through his medical school, he separated medical knowledge and practice from myth and superstition basing them instead of fact, observation, and clinical ...