Miranda Warnings And The Miranda Warning Essay

Miranda Warnings And The Miranda Warning Essay

Length: 1119 words (3.2 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

This paper provides an overlook about the Miranda Warning. The five parts of the Miranda warning are analyzed for an unaware person about the law. Each part of the Miranda warning is given and explained to make an unaware person know exactly what it means. It explains how the Miranda warning is an appropriate balance between the defendant’s rights and it still enables law enforcement to do their job duties. The Supreme Court wants to pull back the Miranda Warnings in the near future. The writer is against this act based on recent act that have been conducted by the law. The writer analyzes and presents a supported argument in favor of being against retaining the Miranda warnings as it currently stands. The writer feels that it would be unconstitutional to not make a person aware of their rights before arrest or detainment. In conclusion, providing an overlook of the Miranda act and its functions.








Keywords:



Rights of the Defendants
The Miranda waning was created to help criminals or people understand their rights before they are detained by the police, FBI, or etc. The case that called for the Miranda waning to be enacted was Miranda vs. Arizona (1966). This case declared that the suspects in custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and be represented during questioning. At times police would find someone who lived on the streets and torture them into a confession. This was clearly unethical unfortunately people continue to be locked away.
The first part of the Miranda clearly states “You have the right to remain silent.” This basically represents that you do not have to talk to the police if you choose not too. They cannot co-hoarse you into talking to them and giving any information or a confession....


... middle of paper ...


...rime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” This amendment protects the suspect; however it does not ask or state that you can have an attorney present during questioning. In the past years many people have invoked their 5th amendment and still some testimony was used in the court of law.
The fact that the Supreme Court wants to rule out the Miranda Warning in my opinion would be unconstitutional.


Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Law Enforcement and Miranda Warnings Case Analysis Essay

- This paper will go through the first arrest that a new police officer did while responding to a house break in. It will show what a FTL would say to the new officer on how they did with the situation after the arrest. We will identify four issues during the arrest that related to the Miranda Laws. Then, we will try and relate these issues to a historical case. Later, we will carefully analysis the situation and see if we could resolve the issues or not. We will then go over how these issues could have been prevent from happening....   [tags: miranda rights, fifth amendment, law enforcement]

Strong Essays
1070 words (3.1 pages)

Criminal Investigations, In Custody and Miranda Warnings Essay

- Discuss the differences between the terms interview and interrogation. Interviewing is talking to people, who are not suspects in a crime but who knows something and knows who is involved in the crime. Also getting their information, and asking questions to them, and knowing when to translate or interpret. The main people involved when getting information at a crime scene is the witnesses, criminal and the accuser (Orthman, Hess, 2013). Interrogation questioning of the suspects, once the suspect is known of their identity and where they reside the person who is the participant of the crime could make a statement, confession, refusal, corroborated with self-supporting documentation that could...   [tags: differences between interview and interrogation]

Strong Essays
664 words (1.9 pages)

Miranda Case Of Miranda V. Arizona Essay

- MIRANDA WARNING 2 The Duhaime’s Law Dictionary defines Miranda Warning as: “A requirement that police officers, in the U.S.A., before any questioning is so begun, warn suspects upon arrest that they have the right to remain silent, that any statement that they make could be used against them in a court of law, that they have the right to contact a lawyer and that if they cannot afford a lawyer, that one will be provided”. If an officer fails to read the Miranda warning prior to questioning, any confession or information that is obtained will not be admissible in court....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]

Strong Essays
1063 words (3 pages)

Essay on The Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

- MIRANDA 2 The case of Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 [1966]) is one of the most important cases in history. It brought about prominent rights that are still existent today in 2015 regarding interrogations and custody. The results of this case are still seen in the current criminal justice system. However, even though the rights that were given to the system by the court, there are still instances today in which these Miranda rights are violated. The concept of Miranda has evolved a lot from a court case to a code used by law enforcement during custodies and investigations....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona, Police]

Strong Essays
1271 words (3.6 pages)

Essay about Miranda Rights And The Grand Debate

- Miranda Rights and the Grand Debate As we have learned the Fifth Amendment and the Miranda Rights are linked in one way or another. They became linked in 1966 when the Supreme Court decided the Miranda v. Arizona that made it clear that the public is being questioned or has been placed in custody by an officer that they must be read there Miranda Right, before they start to question them. It is so important that officers do their best to make sure that they read the individuals there Miranda right, so that they can use information that is obtained against the suspect....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]

Strong Essays
1111 words (3.2 pages)

The Miranda V. Arizona Case Essays

- The Miranda v. Arizona case not just for the case itself, but also for the significance of the case it had after the case. The Miranda is a nationwide that has changed law enforcement and has changed the rights of an individual. The Miranda rights law took affect after a man named Ernesto Miranda was under arrest by police officers. As police arrested Ernesto Miranda they didn’t read him his rights. Ernest Miranda lived in Phoenix, Arizona where he was charged with rape, kidnapping and robbery. Ernesto Miranda was a criminal, however he was not informed of his legal rights before the arrest....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]

Strong Essays
1709 words (4.9 pages)

The Miranda V. Arizona Case Essay

- If a seventh grade boy is interrogated by a police officer, he has the pressure to tell the truth; however if an adult was to be interrogated they would know that they have the right to remain silent. This correlates with the Miranda v. Arizona case, stating that you have the right to remain silent, and after you are told these rights anything you say can be used against you in the court of law. And because children are psychologically and socially different from adults this raises the question- if the age of a child subjected to police questioning is also relevant when determining police custody for Miranda purposes....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]

Strong Essays
1135 words (3.2 pages)

The Case Of Ernesto Miranda Essay

- Ernesto Miranda grew up not finishing high school. He didn’t finish the 9th grade, and he decided to drop out of school during that year. He also had a criminal record and had pronounced sexual fantasies after dropping out of high school. Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix in 1963. He had raped an 18 yr. girl who was mildly mentally handicapped in March of 1963. He was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. When he was found and arrested, and he was not told of his rights before interrogation....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]

Strong Essays
1501 words (4.3 pages)

Essay on Miranda V. Arizona Case

- Everyone agrees that police should not use unconstitutional methods to coerce a suspect into giving out a confession, yet police have used unauthorized force throughout American history. Fortunately, the Supreme Court created a legal safeguard against police abuses. The safeguards were created in the 1960s after taking a case titled Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda v. Arizona is unarguably one of the most important actions the Supreme Court has taken to prevent police abuses. Many jurisdictions have interpreted Miranda v....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]

Strong Essays
1116 words (3.2 pages)

Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Essay

- The landmark case, Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most important legal cases in the United States. The decision of the case led to the creation of the Miranda Rights, which is still practiced to this day. Miranda Rights- “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?” (Decision Date: June.13.1966)....   [tags: Miranda v. Arizona]

Strong Essays
735 words (2.1 pages)