Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative Effects Of Genetically Modified Engineering In Agriculture
Effects of genetic engineering on agriculture
History of genetically modified foods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Unlike genetically modified plants, genetically modified animals are not yet available to consume. However, some animals were subjected to trails of genetic modification. There are three main processes in genetically modifying animals. A group at Yale University conducted the first in 1980. The process, known as microinjection, was used to fertilize mouse eggs with foreign human growth DNA to result in a hybrid genome. This process however has only a five percent success rate and therefore is not very effective. The next process is known as retroviruses. This process allows ribonucleic acid to serve as a template to produce DNA and later inserted into the host’s gene. However, this causes random placement of the DNA and is not a very popular method. The last method is called embryonic stem cell transfer. This allows gene targeting and the insertion of DNA into a specific spot in the animal’s gene, much like genetic engineering in plants (Lee). Genetic modified animals that are currently being tested include salmon, sheep, swine, and cows. Even though genetic modified animals are controversial, many benefits can come from genetically altered animals.
In 1995, a company known as AquaBounty, applied for approval from the Food and Drug Administration to begin selling to the general public a genetically modified salmon. The salmon, known as Salmo salar, carries two different types of DNA. The first DNA is a growth hormone from the Chinook salmon. The other is DNA from the ocean pout, or Zoarces americanus, a type of eel that lives in very cold and deep waters. With these two insertions into the genetic code of the salmon, the salmon can produce a growth hormone all year round instead of just during the summer months. Producing growth...
... middle of paper ...
..."Genetically Modified Crops." Biotechnology: In Context. Ed. Brenda Wilmoth Lerner and K. Lee Lerner. Detroit: Gale, 2012. In Context Series. Student Resources in Context. Web. 23 Jan. 2014.
Anthes, Emily. "Don’t Be Afraid of Genetic Modification." The New York Times. The New York Times, 9 Mar. 2013. Web. 15 Jan. 2014.
Bren, Linda. "Genetic Engineering: The Future Of Foods?." FDA Consumer 37.6 (2003): 28- 34. Health Source - Consumer Edition. Web. 23 Jan. 2014.
Gore, Albert. “Genetic Engineering: Defining the Issue.” Manipulating Life: Debating the Genetic Revolution. Ed. Gary E. McCuen. Hudson: G.E. McCuen Publications, 1985. Print.
Lee, Thomas F. "Genetic Engineering." Encyclopedia Americana. Grolier Online, 2014. Web. 16 Jan. 2014.
Rhines, Karin. "Using Genetics for Food Production." The New Book of Popular Science. Grolier Online, 2014. Web. 16 Jan. 2014.
The fish is modified to carry a growth hormone gene from the Pacific chinook salmon and DNA from the eel-like ocean pout. This allows the salmon to grow faster as the hormone is kept active all the time.
Fish and other animals are being genetically modified which means that they could be unhealthy or could lead to huge toxicity cases furthermore they could start to genetically modify other animals like cows. This is an unreasonable decision because the harms are inadequate which could mean there could be much harm like toxicity and allergic reactions which means that GMO is not safe and should not be in the market till all the advantages and disadvantages are figured out.
Rifkin, Jeremy. "The Ultimate Therapy: Commercial Eugenics on the Eve of the Biotech Century." Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. 7th ed. Ed.
In order to understand the arguments for and against genetic enhancement, one must first understand what it entails. In 19...
Atlantic salmon have become the species of choice to raise on farms because they are more adaptable to the farming techniques and make better use of feed so they produce more salmon with less feed. Not everybody agrees however, that farmed salmon raised in net pens are healthy for the environment or for you to eat. Over the years, there have been numerous stories in the media that have pointed out the negatives of farm raised salmon. These arguments have ranged from wastes from salmon farms, the spreading of disease from farmed to wild fish, the negative impacts of farm raised fish escapes and interacting with native fish, and recently, the effects of farmed salmon consumption on human health. The latest issue that the media got there hands on and consequently got the public concerned, was a report that polychlorinated... ...
Matt Bird explains “Genetic engineering can eliminate age barriers,” but he also states, “Genetic engineering’s ability to expand life has a drawback in that it can cause overpopulation.” This shows that the genetic engineering that Jonas’s community can have good things, but it may also have bad aspects to it. Matt Bird says that genetically modified babies can be made stronger, faster, tougher, and smarter, but his article also claims that doing so would have a larger chance for a mutant. In Jonas’s community they genetically modify the babies so they can’t see colors, but there is a chance that they could create a
People should not have access to genetically altering their children because of people’s views on God and their faith, the ethics involving humans, and the possible dangers in tampering with human genes. Although it is many parent’s dream to have the perfect child, or to create a child just the way they want, parents need to realize the reality in genetic engineering. Sometimes a dream should stay a figment of one’s imagination, so reality can go in without the chance of harming an innocent child’s life.
Genetically modified organisms are defined as, “An organism whose genetic characteristics have been altered by the insertion of a modified gene from another organism using the techniques of genetic engineering” (“AAAS”, 2012). Typi...
gives us the right to do so. Before we go on any further, it is
Most of the foods that we consume from grocery stores are products of artificial selection in which humans breed select animals or plants together because of their desirable traits that we see as useful and beneficial. However, genetically modifying a food is a process that is completely different. For GM salmon, scientists are inserting the growth gene from the Pacific Chinook salmon and a switch-on gene from the Ocean Pout into the fertilized eggs of Atlantic salmon ("Clarified: What does," 2010). The Pacific Chinooks growth genes will allow the genetically altered salmon to grow to its full adult size in half the time, while the Ocean Pout switch-on gene will allow it to grow during the winter and summer months ("Clarified: What does," 2010). Ultimately, instead of waiting approximately 36 months to reach their eight-pound market ready weight, we would only be waiting 18 months, allowing the GM salmo...
Usage of genetic modification to pick and chose features and personality traits of embryos could conceivably occur in future times. Wealthy individuals could essentially purchase a baby with built-in genetic advantages (Simmons). Ethically, these seem immoral. Playing God and taking control over the natural way of life makes some understandably uneasy. Ultimately, religious and moral standpoints should play a role in the future of genetic engineering, but not control it. Genetic engineering’s advantages far outweigh the cost of a genetically formulated baby and
U.S. Food And Drug Administration (2013, July 23). An overview of Atlantic salmon, its natural history, aquaculture, and genetic engineering. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/VeterinaryMedicineAdvisoryCommittee/ucm222635.htm
Sandel, M. J. The case against perfection, ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Belknap Press, 2007. Print.
Coker, Jeffrey Scott. "Genetic Engineering Is Natural and Should Be Pursued." Genetic Engineering, edited by Noël Merino, Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context,
Human genetic engineering has the capability to transmit usually fatal diseases. Although transmission is highly unlikely, it is one of the risk factors scientists have taken into great consideration. If animal cells or organs are transplanted into humans, zoonotic diseases may be spread. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses, and Nipah Encephalitis are all potentially fatal zoonotic diseases that could be transferred (Glenn). According to Linda MacDonald Glenn, J.D., L.L.M., “The introduction of these diseases to the human population could have devastating consequences” (Glenn). Human genetic engineering may also cause the production of unwanted mutations such as developmental issues. The procedures that would be used for genetically modifying human cells would include numerous alterations to sperm, eggs, stem cells, or embryos before entering a woman’s uterus. This could potentially modify the growth and development of the fetus in ways that have not yet b...