Marbury V Madison Case Study

1743 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Marbury v. madison 1803 case essay

Derek Bloom
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Introduction
Marbury v. Madison (1803) refers to a landmark case in US law that laid the basis for the application of judicial review, particularly under Article three of the Constitution. The outcome of the case helped define the limits between the country’s distinct executive and judicial branches. Marbury v. Madison (1803) came about after William Marbury’s application to the (SC) Supreme Court. The application came after President John Adams appointed him as Justice of the Peace. He beseeched the SC to obligate the Secretary of State J. Madison to supply the documents. The Court recognized that Madison 's rejection to send forward the commission was both remediable and illegal. Nevertheless, it thought …show more content…

As a result, Marbury v. Madison was simply the start of SC case to apply an already prevailing power. These scholars point to accounts about judicial review created in the Constitutional Convention, as well as the state ratifying conventions. They also point to accounts about the review particularly in publications, discussion ratification, as well as the court cases prior to that of Marbury that entailed judicial review (Scheb and Scheb 172). Not anything in the copy of the Constitution, however, openly accredited the authority of reviewing the judiciary before this monumental case. In an undivided decision through Justice Marshall, the SC indicated that Marbury, undeniably, deserved his commission. Nonetheless, more significantly, the 1789 Act of the Judiciary turns to be …show more content…

His Secretary of State ought to have delivered the official documents approving the appointments. However, the Secretary of State failed to deliver these documents or commissions to the then 3 new peace justices prior to President John Adams ' term of office was terminated. One of the official documents was to be presented to William Marbury. After Thomas Jefferson became the new President in about March 1801, he discovered Adams 's plans of attempting to fill the country’s court with Federalist judges (Amatrudo and Blake 87). The new president also learned of the previous executive’s inability to deliver the new commissions. As a strategy to jeopardize John Adams’ efforts, Jefferson directed his Secretary of State to decline the

Show More
Related

  • State V Marshall Case Study

    1625 Words  | 4 Pages

    Facts: Rex Marshall testified that the deceased came into his store intoxicated, and started whispering things to his wife. The defendant stated that he ordered the deceased out of the store immediately, however the deceased refused to leave and started acting in an aggressive manner; by slamming his hate down on the counter. He then reached for the hammer, the defendant states he had reason to believe the deceased was going to hit him with the hammer attempting to kill him. Once the deceased reached for the hammer the defendant shot him almost immediately.

    Read More

  • The Court Case of Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review

    866 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Adams, the previous Federalist president, lost the Election of 1800 to Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Before Jefferson took office, Adams decided to appoint as many Federalists into the Supreme court as he could, including William Marbury, all of whom needed to be commissioned in order to be officially sworn in. However, Jefferson took office before the commissions could be handed out, and he ordered his Secretary of State, James Madison, to not deliver the commissions. Marbury proceeded to ask Marshall for a writ of mandamus (found in Section 13 of the Judiciary Act), forcing Madison to issue the commissions. This dispute between Marbury and Madison sparks the famous case. The dilemma here is the differences in interpretation. Some viewed Section 13 as unconstitutional, as it added power to the Judicial Branch, disrupting checks and balances. Others saw that “Marbury had been duly appointed…[and] the writ of mandamus [was] to be an appropriate legal remedy for resolving Marbury’s dilemma”(Clinton 86). Marshall wanted to issue the...

    Read More

  • Checks and Balances: The Three Branches of Government

    1299 Words  | 3 Pages

    Senate rejected a president’s nominee to the Supreme Court. Gevinson (2009) the senate has rejected a total of 12 nominees out of 159 nomination for Supreme Court Justice that presidents have submitted for confirmation. In 1795 George Washington was the first president to have his nomination for Chief Justice rejected. Robert Bork for Associate Justice nomination by Ronald Reagan was the last to be rejected in 1987 by the senate. The Senate sometimes take their time confirming nominees, which includes 24 they've postponed. Failing to take any action for confirmation, nominees have considered many times backing out. To become Chief Justice of South Carolina's highest court in 1791, John Rutledge resigned after only being on The Supreme Court for a year. On Augus...

    Read More

  • Judicial Review: Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton argued that the Judicial Branch is the “least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution" and that it is “beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power” since it has “neither force nor will, but merely judgment.” [*] While it is true that Hamilton wrote the Federalist Papers as propaganda to garner support for the Constitution by convincing New Yorkers that it would not take away their rights and liberties, it is also true that Article III of the Constitution was deliberately vague about the powers of the Judicial Branch to allow future generations to decide what exactly those powers should be. In the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, established the Court’s power of judicial review. However, as Jill Lepore, Harvard professor of American History, argued, “This was such an astonishing thing to do that the Court didn’t declare another federal law unconstitutional for fifty-four years” after declaring the Judicial Act of 1789 unconstitutional in Marbury v. Madison. [*Jill Lepore] Alexander Hamilton was incorrect in his assertion that the Judicial Branch is the least dangerous to political rights and the weakest of the three government branches because judicial review has made the Supreme Court more powerful than he had anticipated. From 1803 to today, the controversial practice of judicial activism in the Supreme Court has grown—as exemplified by the differing decisions in Minor v. Happersett and United States v. Virginia—which, in effect, has increased the power of the Supreme Court to boundaries beyond those that Alexander Hamilton stated in Federalist 78.

    Read More

  • The Influence Of Thomas Jefferson's Louisiana Purchase

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    Madison as he was in the Louisiana Purchase, he was still a key player in this episode that redefined the Judiciary branch of American government. Jefferson had just taken over the presidency from John Adams, a member of the rival Federalist Party, who, during his last days in office, had many of his fellow Federalists assigned offices in the Judiciary, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall (Goldfield 277). Jefferson and his Secretary of State, James Madison, resented this Federalist grab for power and refused to give one of the appointees his position. This appointee, William Marbury, used the Judiciary Act of 1789 to take the issue to court (277). However Marshall, did not rule that Marbury be given his appointment by Jefferson, who had been actively removing Federalist Judges and would likely choose not to acknowledge Marshall’s authority (277). Marshall took a different approach, instead of giving Marbury his appointment, he declared the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional because it gave the Supreme Court authority that was beyond what was outlined in the Constitution (277). By taking away some of his own authority, Marshall gave the Supreme Court the formidable ability to declare laws unconstitutional (277). Interestingly, it would never have happened if Jefferson and his administration had not have taken action (or in this case lack of action) against the appointment

    Read More

  • Thomas Jeff. Outline

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    B. Mabury vs. Madison, 1803: Jefferson failed to uphold the law by refusing to appoint

    Read More

  • Marbury v. Madison: Analyzing the Implications of Judicial Review

    1183 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison: The Legacy of Judicial Review John Marshall, Supreme Court Justice, created legal precedence in the historical case, Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Throughout history, he is portrayed as the fountainhead of judicial review. Marshall asserted the right of the judicial branch of government to void legislation it deemed unconstitutional, (Lemieux, 2003). In this essay, I will describe the factual circumstances and the Supreme Court holdings, explaining the reasoning behind Chief Justice Marshall’s conclusions in the case, Marbury v. Madison. Furthermore, I will evaluate whether the doctrine of judicial review is consistent with the Constitution and analyze the positive effects of the doctrine in American politics.

    Read More

  • Marbury v Madison: Judicial Review

    1201 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison, which established the power of judicial review for the Supreme Court, changed the course of American history. This power to review legislation that congress has passed and possibly deem it unconstitutional has had a profound impact on American society. This power provides a check on the Legislative branch, but it also lends itself to an important debate over when the Court can and should use this power. Should the court use this power to increase the power of the national government, something many call judicial activism? Or should this power be used to curtail national legislative power and increase the liberties given to individuals? During the period around the Great Depression, the court dealt with many economic cases regarding these questions, and at first glance, it appears that they did not seem to favor either the government or the individual. Looking closer, however, one sees that the cases that side with the individual struck down legislation that interfered with the commerce clause or police power. When legislation invoking either of the aforementioned clauses was provided, the Supreme Court tended to side with the Government over the individual, as seen in the cases Munn v. Illinois, National Relations Board v. Jones, and Wickard v. Filburn. When the legislation provided had no business with the commerce clause or police power, such as in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, the court had no choice but to side with the individual.

    Read More

  • Louisiana Purchase: Expanding and Reshaping America

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    The background behind the Louisiana Purchase stems back to one of the key points of the Jeffersonians. The Jeffersonians longed for pro-French foreign policy during the debates on how the United States Constitution should be perceived. In 1789 George Washington became the first president of the United States, and one of the four members in his cabinet is none other than Thomas Jefferson, to whom was appointed as Secretary of State. Jefferson favored a strict interpretation of the United States Constitution, and the Louisiana Purchase treaty was a target of Federalist legislators in 1803 (Carson). Eight months before the purchase of the Louisiana Territory, came the issue of judicial review during the case of Marbury v. Madison (Theriault 294). William Marbury sued the federal government for commission as a judge, which was held by the current Secretary of State James Madison. Chief Justice John Marshall dismisses the lawsuit, and Marshall rules the Judiciary Act of 1801 as unconstitutional. As a result of Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court determines constitutionality. The addition of new territory was not formally stated in the United States Constitution, and the members during the eighth session of Congress thought that it would disrupt the balance of power in favor of the Southern and Western states

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson's Presidency

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Jefferson came into office, he planned to institute the policies of the Democratic-Republicans in domestic affairs. The judicial system had gained a lot of power through the Federalists which forced Jefferson to attempt to shrink their influence. He ultimately prevailed, and even reduce...

    Read More

  • The Marshall Court

    1506 Words  | 4 Pages

    The life of every American citizen, whether they realize it or not, is influenced by one entity--the United States Supreme Court. This part of government ensures that the freedoms of the American people are protected by checking the laws that are passed by Congress and the actions taken by the President. While the judicial branch may have developed later than its counterparts, many of the powers the Supreme Court exercises required years of deliberation to perfect. In the early years of the Supreme Court, one man’s judgement influenced the powers of the court systems for years to come. John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, and as the only lasting Federalist influence in a newly Democratic-Republican government, he and his fellow justices sought to perpetuate their Federalist principles in the United States’ court system. In one of the most memorable court cases of all time--the case of Marbury v. Madison-- Marshall established the idea of judicial review and strengthened the power of the judicial branch in the government. Abiding by his Federalist ideals, Marshall decided cases that would explicitly limit the power of the state government and broaden the strengths of the national government. Lastly, the Marshall Court was infamous for determining the results of cases that dealt with the interpretation of the Constitution and the importance of contracts in American society. The Marshall Court, over the span of a mere three decades, managed to influence the life of every American citizen even to this day by impacting the development of the judicial branch, establishing a boundary between the state and national government, and making declarations on the sanctity of contracts ("The Marshall Court"...

    Read More

  • Marbury v. Madison: Judicial Review

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    President John Adams and the Federalist lost the election to Thomas Jefferson. The lame-duck Federalist of Congress enacted a Judiciary Act. The act created 58 new judgeships that Adams appointed. Forty two included justiceships of the peace. “Jefferson complained that the Federalist ‘have retired into the judiciary as a stronghold’” (Black, n.d.). Towards the end of Adams presidency, many people beside Marbury were appointed to government positions. Acting Secretary of the State John Marshall had affixed the official seal for the justices of the peace to the commissions. However they did not get delivered until the day after Adams left office. The day after Thomas Jefferson was inaugurated; James Madison was the new Secretary of State was directed to withhold delivery of the commissions which included William Marbury and 16 others. Murbury sued to have his commission handed over by Madison. Because of the Presidential seal of the United States, Marbury had the right to judicial review because the seal made it official. The Supreme Court was in charge of all cases that included public ministers, consuls and ambassadors. Having this case gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.

    Read More

  • Race and Supreme Court Decisions

    1896 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1803, the decision in Marbury v Madison held that the Supreme Court had the ability to practice the process of judicial review. With this ruling, the Court gave itself the power to deem legislation constitutional or unconstitutional. With this bolstered power, the Supreme Court made numerous landmark decisions throughout the 19th and during the first half of the 20th centuries. The Supreme Court’s power of judicial review played an integral role in shaping post-bellum racial laws and attitudes. In the cases of Plessey v. Ferguson and Brown v. The Board of Education the Supreme Court invoked judicial review to assess racial segregation policies as they related to the 14th Amendment. Both Plessey and Brown are landmark cases because they reflected the social climate of their respective time periods, because both cases had immediate impact upon civil rights law and everyday life in America, and because both cases affected basic interpretation of the Constitution.

    Read More

  • The Case of Marbury v. Madison

    989 Words  | 2 Pages

    The case of Marbury v. Madison centers on a case brought before the Supreme Court by William Marbury. Shortly after Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams in the election of 1800, Congress increased the number of circuit courts. Adams sought to fill these new vacancies with people who had Federalist backgrounds. To accomplish this, he used the powers granted under the Organic Act to issue appointments to 42 justices of the peace and 16 circuit court justices for the District of Columbia. Adams signed the appointments on his last day in office and they were subsequently sealed by Secretary of State John Marshall. However, many of the appointments were not delivered before Adams left office and Jefferson ordered the deliveries stopped when he took charge. Marbury was one of Adams’ appointees for justice of the peace. Marbury brought a case before the Supreme Court seeking a writ of mandamus compelling the new Secretary of State James Madison to deliver the appointment.

    Read More

  • Judicial Review

    689 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is important to understand the classic debate of Yates v. Hamilton in order to comprehend the context of judicial review in American democracy. Robert Yates was an anti-federalist and judge of the New York Supreme Court who advocated that judicial review was not consistent with the spirit of democratic government. He refused to allow the judicial branch the last word over constitutional interpretation. In his paper, Brutus #11, he contended that the power of the judicial branch would be superior to that of the legislature is the Supreme Court acted as final arbiter of the constitution’s meaning, thus “this power in the judicial, will enable them to mould the government, into almost any shape they please. — The manner in which this may be effected we will hereafter examine” (Yates). Yates, above all, believed that the constitution is the mediator between the public and their elected officials. On the other hand, federalist Alexander Hamilton defended the legitimacy of judicial review as the “least dangerous branch” of government. He explained the legitimate status of the courts through the system of checks and balances. Ham...

    Read More

More about Marbury V Madison Case Study

Open Document