Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of participative leadership
Directive participative leadership
Participative leadership v autocratic leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of participative leadership
1. Explain what is meant by participative leadership and identify three situations when participative leadership should be used to improve employee relationships .
This particular style is placed center of the five common methods of leadership in the span of autocratic, paternalistic, delegative and free reign (or liaise faire) styles of leadership. The U.S. Army only codified the three styles of leadership in their basic leadership doctrine- directed, participative and delegative. This is because it is often assumed Soldiers are trained to the levels of proficiency that does not require an autocratic style and at the same time impractical to allow Soldiers to act under free reign style. The leader that uses participation as concepts are that the idyllic management technique is one that receives input from the collective members of the team into consideration. This technique involves the leader including one or more Soldiers in the military decision making process (MDMP) by determining what to do and how to do it. These leaders encourage participation and contributions from group (team) members and help them feel more relevant and committed to the decision-making process. In participative concepts, however, the leader retains the right to allow the input of others. In order to produce favorable results, the leadership that utilizes more group supervision versus directs supervision on a one-to-one basis by employing a participative style with a team of Soldiers who know their duties and responsibilities.
Involved leadership involved managing group meetings, influencing commitment and conformity, and assisting in conflict and communication issues. The benefit to this method of leadership is you demonstrate trust in your subordinates by showing you are interested in their input. You value their ideas and decisions and if time are not an issue; ideas can be discussed freely and shared collectively in a group. This is standard operating procedures when you limited data, and your Soldiers have other parts. Unit leadership Soldiers. Using this style is of mutual benefit as it encourages them to become members of the problem-solvers and make the best choices. This is normally used when you have part of the information, and your Soldiers have other parts.
Unit leadership is not expected to know everything—this is why you employ knowledgeable and skilled Soldiers. Using this technique is of dual benefit as it allows them to become part of the team and allows you to make better decisions. This is the means of getting Soldiers to do what you want them to do.
Effective planning is impossible without first understanding the problem. Commanders rely on personal observations, experiences, and input from others to develop understanding. They also prioritize information requests and incorporate additional information as those requests are answered. A complete understanding of the problem and environment builds the foundation for the operational process and ...
Commanders at all levels face increasingly challenging scenarios as the operational environment changes. Some instinctively motivate and empower their subordinates to think and act independently, thereby influencing actions during combat. However, those who understand the commanders' activities of mission command will influence not only subordinates, but the outcome of the battle as well. Mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders.1 Commanders who understood the importance of mission command was Major General Horatio Gates. General Gates at the Battle of Saratoga successfully utilized mission command through leading, understanding, visualizing and assessing.
...and, the Brigade will lead the effort, ensure unity of effort, and support the Battalions’ initiatives. The Brigade will “lead by walking around” to demonstrate its commitment to set and maintain an ethical command system. Being “fair but firm”, the Brigade will also give itself the means to support subordinate’s initiatives and remove those leaders that refuse to convert to the new vision.
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP An autocratic leadership style is one where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. Therefore the group becomes dependent on him or her. The result of this style is the members of the group are often dissatisfied with the leader. This results in little cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision, and poor levels of motivation amongst employees. A democratic leadership style encourages participation in decision making.
Many individuals in our military today have this notion that just because they earned their “stripes” that they automatically deserve respect, and that their subordinates should and will listen to them strictly because of what is on their chest. A true leader not only leads, develops, and mentors, but they embody and apply those leader competencies in their everyday life both on and off duty. Being a leader doesn’t mean you always have to be the mean guy. It means that you can successfully provide purpose, direction and motivation to make your Soldiers want to work for you to accomplish the mission. In this paper, I will discuss and give examples about the difference between Competent Leadership
After completing the “Leadership Style Questionnaire” and analyzing my results, I have learned what my preferred leadership style is and how that influences how I lead and may be perceived from members of the group. From the results attained from the questionnaire, my preferred style of leadership is directing. This type of leadership style is best for individuals who have a low competency and high commitment level. These types of leaders are highly focused on tasks and less focused on relationships. They make decisions without consulting with the group and communicate without regarding the group’s concerns or suggestions. This type of leader also supervises the followers intently. They are very successful in creating objectives for each follower and the group as a whole to guide the group in reaching a certain goal.
Leadership has been defined as "the art of influencing people to the degree that they are willingly and eagerly to achieve the objectives of the army and encourage them to develop not only in action but in the desire to work with enthusiasm and confidence"(writer’s name, 2017).Management is dangerously important in people’s lives. Proactive leaders strive continuously to master and gain more skills in daily bases for the benefit of their followers. However, inexperienced leaders can result in unwelcomed outcomes and find themselves along with their people in a devastated abyss. Therefore, leading is a unique art and a social behavior that help people achieving and reaching their rewards, because leaders are responsible for all aspects of the
Halal and Brown (1981) write that participative management may not only increase productivity and decrease operating costs associated with low morale, it may enhance flexibility through lowering the decision making process to the operational level. This is because the operational level is where the actual work is completed. The manager or supervisor does not always have the best picture of how a process is completed, and they can get lost in the details. The operational level knows the details, thus to work together collaboratively is key. According to Mooney (n.d.) the participative leader empowers others. This is someone who is willing to share the spotlight by giving their employees the opportunity to make major decisions. They are also there to support these workers when they make mistakes and need help in solving problems. This leader invests much of their own success by placing it in the hands of those they
The concept of leadership arises out of the need for cooperative action by human beings to achieve certain goals. Leadership seeks to identify and deploy the groups’ pooled resources to tackle problems in order to achieve set objectives. While human beings are independent and capable of individual action, there are many situations in real life that require dependence on one person or a small group of people who have a broad view of the intervening issues enabling them to direct the actions of the rest of the individuals. The degree of success from this effort is a measure of the leadership skill present within a team.
Chan, K. W. & Maubourgne, R. A. 1992, Parables of leadership, Harvard Business Review, July-August.
As General Dempsey states in his White Paper, “Leader development is an investment required to maintain the Army as a profession and is a key source of combat power. Leadership entails the repetitive exercise of discretionary judgments, all highly moral in nature, and represents the core function of the Army professional’s military art, whether leading a patrol in combat or making a major policy or budget decision in the Pentagon.”
...adership Practices in Relation to Productivity and Morale." In D. Cartwright and A. Zander, Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd ed. (Elmsford, NY: Row, Paterson, 1960)
It is a type of leadership that depends on the followers and the situation they are given. There are four different type of leadership style; directing, coaching, supporting, and delegating. There is not one type of style that trumps the other, they each are beneficial to each of the different situations. The leadership style and the development level of followers are what being measured through this approach in a graph. The leadership style is measured on how much support and direction you are giving the followers. For example, if you have a follower that is super excited about a project but has no experience, then she would need a directing type of leadership because she has the drive to complete the project, she just needs instruction. The leadership skills are based on the situation while the development levels are based the follower and their needs. They measure a follower’s competence and commitment, if a follower is lacking one of these areas, then the leader should adjust their leadership style to improve what they are lacking. I believe this is the best leadership strategy because it takes a true leader that is willingly to alter their style to meet the needs of their followers and help them reach their full potential. These leaders go out of their way to make sure their followers and their organization succeed. This type of leadership style requires a little more
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
An officer's ability to lead his or her soldiers is contingent on the officer's knowledge of his soldier's skills. The US Army Officer is a professional, providing expertise, leadership, and an example for his soldiers to follow. Every soldier is a subject matter expert, trained in a specific competency. An officer, that soldier's leader, needs to be able to employ that soldier effectively. That means understanding a soldier's skills. An Officer needs to further have the ability to train that soldier outside of the US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) schools. This means a successful officer must become proficient in, if not an expert of, his soldier's competencies. For an average soldier, this would mean several MOS style training schools. In intelligence, a soldier can be anything from a Prophet...