The Importance Of Colonialism In Joseph Conrad's Invisible Man

2036 Words5 Pages

Often in human history, suppression of a deemed inferior group leads to a convoluted struggle with perspective playing a central part. In Ralph Ellison’s novel Invisible Man, the unnamed character is a black man living in Jim Crow South. He has graduated from high school, but events transpire more and more chaotically as he is ignored and treated unfairly on his journey. Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad incorporates a European narrator called Marlow who ventures deeper into the Congo River in Africa with a Belgian ivory-trading firm at the peak of imperialism. Marlow searches for a venerable man named Kurtz who is the face of the company, and discovers more and more about the nature of European colonialism along his way. Both Invisible Man …show more content…

In each of the two literary works, a main character undertakes a physical as well as a psychological journey. In Invisible Man, the unnamed narrator is thrust into a world of prejudice and risk. Initially he is rewarded with a scholarship for giving a modest speech about African Americans’ role in society just after being forced to humiliation in a blindfolded, intra-racial brawl for entertainment. However, the narrator finds after going to college that an overabundance of misfortune manages to inflict him. He muses that he “had kept unswervingly to the path placed before [him], had tried to be exactly what [he] was expected to be, had done exactly what [he] was expected to do – yet, instead of winning the expected reward, here [he] was stumbling along” (Ellison 167). The narrator goes from the black college in the South to Harlem, New York, where he has difficulty staying afloat. The narrator barely gets a job, nearly dies in an explosion, and is constantly mistaken for others or ignored altogether, which exacerbates his already troublesome situation. In …show more content…

Ellison’s narrator states that he has “been hurt to the point of abysmal pain, hurt to the point of invisibility. And [he defends] because in spite of all [he finds] find that [he loves]. ... [He’s] a desperate man – but too much of your life will be lost, its meaning lost, unless you approach it as much through love as through hate. So [he approaches] it through division” (Ellison 567). The narrator articulately uses paradoxes to enthrall the reader in this segment of his epilogue. Still, the contradiction apparent between the narrator’s emotions is entirely possible, as there is no reason that both love and hate cannot coexist in an individual. The speaker, a bona-fide invisible man, despite all the hardship he has faced, still describes his story with some love. The idea of balance is brought into the equation, something that Ellison has seldom told of in the story, a friendly contrast to the rest of the novel’s stark unfairness and disparity. In the end, our storyteller finds that despite the hate thrust upon him, he feels compelled to love just as equally if not more. This gives a positive light to human nature, while suggesting that the antagonistic race of the novel, Caucasians, will ultimately feel that emotion as well and reconcile with African Americans. That’s a message that finally found its way into the minds of the American

Open Document