Many philosophers throughout time have had varying thoughts on what morals and their rules should be. A German philosopher, Immanuel Kant however, had somewhat intense views especially in regard to lying. He created four specific formulations regarding morality, the first was to create a maxim that supports your moral standpoint. Second is to take that maxim and apply it as universal law in which all must follow including oneself which in turn implies natural law. Third is to take into account the plausibility of the maxim when ruled by natural law. If the third law applies then the forth is to decide whether you could and would act on your maxim, if so it is morally allowable. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
The first of the laws is one of the most important and focused on laws by Kant. Kant believed that people should only follow rules that are and can be followed universally. Conformity is essential in Kant’s theory, if society accept something as a norm, then it should be followed by everyone. Furthermore, Kant didn’t believe people should simply do something ...
... middle of paper ...
...ave their family. Kant neglects horrific situations where people are often requires picking the lesser of two moral wrong doings.
• In conclusion, Kant had a swaying argument and can be commended for his chivalrous desires concerning morals. If people lie, and accept that lying is okay, it creates a helter-skelter society and disrupts the natural order and our innate ability to trust one another. Although lying is morally wrong, Kant overlooked the value of being human. As humans, we are able to weigh out the best options and make decisions based upon what the Utilitarian’s would call the greater good. People have the ability to decide which moral wrong doing is heavier and which will have what they believe to be the smallest impact. Kant’s view is more of a sci-fi robotic sense of reasoning that could not every truly functions in society with unknown variables.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In Elements of Pure Practical Reason Book, I, Immanuel Kant, a prominent late Enlightenment Era German philosopher discusses his most famous ethical theory, the “Categorical Imperative.” The “Categorical Imperative” is a proposed universal law in stating all humans are forbidden from certain actions regardless of consequences. Although this is the general definition of this ethical theory, the Categorical Imperative” exists in two above formulations, A strict interpretation of Categorical Imperative and a more liberal interpretation.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Philosophy, Ayn Rand, Kantianism]
1257 words (3.6 pages)
- Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism are two schools of thought that view morality differently. Both Kant and Mill understand and agree that some form of morality exists. They both recognize that the concept of morality applies to all rational beings and that an action can be deemed as moral or immoral based on reason. Despite being reasonably in agreement about what morality is; there are numerous important differences between Mill and Kant’s perception of morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Utilitarianism]
1759 words (5 pages)
- Google defines Categorical Imperative as “(in Kantian ethics) an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's inclination or purpose.” (Google) Thus, there is no middle ground on morals nor is there ever a situation to where one should commit a moral wrong doing. Immanuel Kant had strong views regarding Categorical Imperative and believed that universal law applies to all. He also believes there cannot be any exceptions to this rule, or it becomes right for all to live by the exception.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Ethics, Human]
981 words (2.8 pages)
- Melissa Stachowiak Good Life Take-home #2 Professor Gan November 20, 2015 5.) What is the difference between a hypothetical and a categorical imperative. In class when we had the conversation about chapter two of Immanuel Kant’s Grounding of Morals, we had discussed the imperatives. The imperatives are broken down into two sections, hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative each having different meanings. Hypothetical imperative is described as a “command that a particular action is necessary as a means to some purpose, such as the attainment of personal happiness” (Kant).... [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]
1389 words (4 pages)
- Immanuel Kant was known as a German philosopher in the 18th century. During this time, he came up with the concept of categorical imperative; this concept is described as a moral law that applies to individuals and how they make decisions and approach situations. Kant’s concept is separate from personal motives or desires, it is an obligation that an individual will do something for their themselves and not what may come out of it in the future. In the book “Grounding for Metaphysics and Morals” Kant states, “A rational being must always regard himself as a legislator in a kingdom of ends rendered possible by the freedom of the will whether as member or as sovereign.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1221 words (3.5 pages)
- Moral decision-making constitutes an important part of the everyday human life. In this paper, I will examine and contrast Utilitarianism and Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative, both, which provide people with a moral structure, and how the issue of etiquettes relates to Kantian Theory. It is important to note that both the theories have their advantages and drawbacks, thus to enable one to make a methodical decision, it is important to understand the basic principles of each. However, in this paper there will be a main focus on Kantian Categorical argument and then discussing the issue of etiquettes.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Morality]
1620 words (4.6 pages)
- Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason (Pojman and Vaughn 239). According to Kant, there is one good thing that comes without qualification – a good will. Any other act done as only being good with qualification, and only a good will is worthy of happiness. A good will is done because it is one’s duty, not someone just doing a duty. The expected consequences of an act of good will are morally neutral, and therefore irrelevant to moral discussion.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1168 words (3.3 pages)
- The Categorical Imperative Of Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy What would you do if you saw a little old lady with a cane walking slowly across a busy street without remembering to look both ways. Most people would answer that they would run out into the street to save her. However, why would these people do this. The rescuer may have not had any relation whatsoever to the little old lady, yet they still decide to risk their life for her. Was it because of basic, natural instinct. Did the rescuer just instantly react to what he/she saw and just let his reaction take over his body.... [tags: essays research papers]
1606 words (4.6 pages)
- Maggie Fitzgerald was raised knowing one thing; she was trash. She had no true family that cared for her. No one even really knew she existed. The only person who gave her hope was her father. That was true up until she found the sport boxing and met Frankie. She earned everything through blood, sweat, and tears. Even when people were telling her she couldn’t do it, she still tried. Through all of this Maggie gained freedom, personhood, and experience. Freedom according to Immanuel Kant is the ability to guide ones actions using laws of one’s own making.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative]
773 words (2.2 pages)
- Categorical Imperative is a philosophical theory was developed by Kant in 1785. If someone does not know what is categorical imperative means, the term imperative in my own words means that you should do something. If you put the the two terms together, categorical imperative means that an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's purpose.Basically, The Categorical Imperative is something that one should do, but not because it will benefit you in this way.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Ethics, Categorical imperative]
1316 words (3.8 pages)
- Steve Jobs : A Visionary Leader
- How Banning Birth Control Affects Women 's Lives
- Social Stratification Of Roman Catholic Policies
- Presidential Elections Are The One Time Of Year
- The Social Embeddedness Indicator Is Crucial Because It Is Important For Management Levels
- Case Study : Panmai Co Operative