Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature adds to reality it does not simply describe it
Michel foucaults essays
Michel foucault power and knowledge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Those who tell the stories also hold the power”-Plato
French social theorist Michel Foucault developed a notion of discourse in “The Archaeology of Knowledge” and defined it as “systems of thoughts composed of ideas, attitudes, courses of action, beliefs and practices that systematically constructs the subjects and the worlds of which they speak”. Foucault traces the role of discourse in wider social processes of legitimating and power, emphasizing the construction of current truths, how they are maintained and what power relations they carry with them. He theorizes discourse to be a medium through which power relations produce speaking subjects. For him power and knowledge are inter-related and therefore every human relationship is a struggle and negotiation of power. Discourse therefore is controlled by objects, what can be spoken of; ritual, where and how one may speak; and the privileged, who may speak. As such, an object becomes a “node within a network”. As an example, a book is not made up of individual words on a page, each of which has meaning, but rather is caught up in a system of references to other books, other texts, other sentences. The meaning of that book is connected to a larger, overarching web of knowledge and ideas to which it relates.
While New Historicists like Stephen Greenblatt turned to history to explain the formal structures of literary texts, Hayden White investigated the formal literary structures of history, describing a “poetics of history”. In his book “The Historical Text as a Literary Artefact”, he gives a broad reflection on the very nature of culture and on the nature of humanity itself. Reacting against the tendency of history as a discipline to seek it’s models in the sciences, White consi...
... middle of paper ...
...l Foucault”. New York, Routledge, 2008.
• Lyotard, Jean François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans.Geoffrey and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984
• Leitch, Vincent B, The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York: W.W.Norton and Co.2001.
• Misra, Tilottama (ed.). The Oxford Anthology of Writings from North-East India: Poetry and Essays. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Can the Subaltern speak? 1985. Print.
• Va1dés, Mario J, Hutcheon, Linda. Rethinking Literary History-Comparatively. University Of Toronto, ACLS Occasional Paper No. 27
• Waugh, Patricia. Literary Theory and Criticism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.
• http://www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/newhistoricism/modules/foucaultpower.html
• http://ctli.wikispaces.com/Hayden+White
Ward & Trent, et al. The Cambridge History of English and American Literature. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1907–21; New York: Bartleby.com, 2000
Ward & Trent, et al. The Cambridge History of English and American Literature. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1907–21; New York: Bartleby.com, 2000
Ward & Trent, et al. The Cambridge History of English and American Literature. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1907–21; New York: Bartleby.com, 2000
Ward & Trent, et al. The Cambridge History of English and American Literature. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1907–21; New York: Bartleby.com, 2000
Macey, David. “Postmodernity.” The Penguin Dictionary of Critical Theory. London: Penguin Books, 2001. 307-309. Print.
Heberle, Mark. "Contemporary Literary Criticism." O'Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. Vol. 74. New York, 2001. 312.
" Literature and Its Times: Profiles of 300 Notable Literary Works and the Historical Events that Influenced Them. Joyce Moss and George Wilson. Vol. 1. Ancient Times to the American and French Revolutions.
Rice, Philip. and Patricia Waugh, eds. Modern Literary Theory. 4th ed. New York: Oxford UP,
Nyren, Dorothy, ed. A Library of Literary Criticism: Modern American Literature. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., 1971.
London: n.p., 1998. Print. fourth Bloomfield, Morton W. New Literary History. Winter ed. N.p.:
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. "Excerpts from The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge." Hutcheon and Natoli 71-90.
Ward & Trent, et al. The Cambridge History of English and American Literature. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1907-21; New York: Bartleby.com, 2000 http://www.bartleby.com/215/0816.html
Clayton, Jay, and Eric Rothstein, eds. Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. Print.
...“Some Common Themes and Ideas within the Field of Postmodern Thought: A handout for HIS 389,” last modified May 13,2013,
Postmodern literary criticism asserts that art, author, and audience can only be approached through a series of mediating contexts. "Novels, poems, and plays are neither timeless nor transcendent" (Jehlen 264). Even questions of canon must be considered within a such contexts. "Literature is not only a question of what we read but of who reads and who writes, and in what social circumstances...The canon itself is an historical event; it belongs to the history of the school" (Guillory 238,44).