A Comparison Of The Sorcerer's Stone And Harry Potter

1048 Words3 Pages

A Different type of Hero
Despite all of the odds against heroes, they prevail through adversity and reach the peak of the mountain through their inner courage. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Harry and his friends demonstrate heroism through their journeys and obstacles. When the average person thinks of a hero they typically think of a superhero that goes out and fights crime like Batman, Superman, and Spiderman, but not all heroes wear capes. There are multiple types of heroes in hero myths such as the classic hero and the anti-hero, The question may be asked whether Harry Potter is considered a hero and if so how?
J.K. Rowling’s view and depiction of a Hero Myth story encompasses both similarities and differences between a typical hero myth. A few similarities begin with the upbringing of Harry Potter, who is the main protagonist in the Harry Potter series. He was born into a notable wizarding family but life then changed when the infamous antagonist, Lord Voldemort, murdered his parents and he became an orphan. Harry was forced to leave behind the wizarding world and grow up with …show more content…

The purpose of an anti- hero is to give the readers or audience another reason to side with the hero. The anti-hero in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone is seen by most of the audience as Lord Voldemort and Severus Snape. Voldemort is a well-defined villain due to his evil actions against Harry and obsessive desire to kill him. The second anti-hero is the character known as Snape who is the professor that always seems to have something out for Harry. It appears to the audience that he does not believe Harry is worthy of the attention and special care that comes with being the boy who lived. Severus Snape is consistently scolding, cold-heartedly nurturing, or critiquing Harry. Snape is the common, prevailing anti-hero because he appears to be opposite of Harry, always deconstructing and reprimanding

Open Document