The Justification Of Corruption In George Orwell's Animal Farm

1121 Words3 Pages

In his satirical dystopian fable Animal Farm, George Orwell demonstrates that corruption is inevitable when individuals have access to power. Orwell uses pseudo-neutral tone to reveal that individuals often become disempowered due to fear, resulting in intimidation. Moreover, he uses dramatic irony to highlight the perpetuation of exploitation of the weak and vulnerable by those in power. Clearly, it is Orwell’s intention to use the deteriorating conditions on Animal Farm to reflect the social stratification that characterised life in Russia during Stalin’s totalitarian regime. Power was centralised in the elite minority while the peasants endured harsh poverty, working long hours for less income. Through his allegorical representation of this historical context, Orwell clearly condemns elitism and …show more content…

The Kulaks who were land owning peasants, were determined to not give their land to the government hence, decided to burn it and kill their animals which motivated Stalin to condemn millions to death by starvation. This functions as the allegorical equivalent of Napoleon’s ruthless dictatorship who brutally crushed any of those who opposed him. This disturbing episode is evident through the pseudo-neutral tone of the third person narrator in, “ordered the hens’ rations to be stopped… nine hens had died in the meantime”. This symbolically represents the first ever internal challenge to Napoleon’s power and how these rebels suffered the brutal consequences. Thus by creating an example, animals are coerced to live in a state of fear which makes it easier for Napoleon to exploit them, to satisfy his lust for power. This idea is further developed through violent visual imagery, established by pseudo-neutral tone of the third person narrator in “there was a pile of corpses lying before Napoleon’s feet and the air was heavy with the smell of

Open Document