Compare And Contrast Functionalism And Conflict Theory

1046 Words3 Pages

Matthew Garcia Pitones Intro to sociology 101 06 September 2016 . The very definition of functionalism is that various parts of society work together to keep society up and running . It 's more like a domino effect of / on some aspects where one thing leads to another and so on and so forth . In other words , functionalism can be described as saying it 's there for a reason . An example of functionalism would be to think of a mousetrap , it 's necessary for getting rid of the mice in your home : but it 's also killing an animal . So in the state of functionalism , it 's telling you that society as it is , is unbalanced , so every part of society has to come together to make it balanced . For example , a family is a great contribution to the function of society , they offer to socialize with their children : their education can offer a variety of skills , knowledge , and history . With their education …show more content…

Understanding conflict theory is to think of it as who benefits more ? , The distribution of resources and the idea of inequality . Functionalism and conflict theory pay more attention to how certain aspects of society , like social groups , establishments , and organizations and how they shape the social world . Now Symbolic interactions differentiate itself from the two by focusing on micro sociology the actions of one another . This theory devil more into how people act according to how they see the world , a great way to look at symbolic interaction is to think that actions speak louder than words . Mainly how people look at society through events and behavior , thus reflecting how they act Symbolic interaction is thought to be constructed on human interpretation , how people clarify other people based on another 's behavior and it 's that clarification that forms a social bond

Open Document