Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Adam Smith and his main contributions to economics
Adam Smith and his main contributions to economics
Adam Smith's analysis and critiques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Adam Smith and his main contributions to economics
Section 1- background information
Adam Smith, was born, or baptized, on June 5, 1723 in Kirkcaldy, then, as now, a small, decent, unprepossessing port on the Firth of Forth. Like so many of the Scottish intelligentsia, his family belonged to the middling ranks of Scottish society. (Phillipson, 2010: 9-11) Both of his parents came from the minor gentry and had the connections with the law, the army, and the world of office-holding on which the routines of Scottish public life and politics. Adam Smith senior was a man of some ability and ambition. He was baptized in 1679, and belonged to the Presbyterian gentry of north-east Scotland. He was educated in law at Aberdeen and Edinburgh. In 1710 Smith senior married Lilias Drummond, the daughter of Sir George Drummond of Milnab, a wealthy and prominent Edinburgh politician. They had one son, Hugh, a sickly child, who seems to have worked in the customs a Kirkcaldy until his death in 1750. (Phillipson, 2010: 9-11) Lilias Smith died sometime between 1716-1718. Smith remarried again in 1720, and once again married into wealth. His second wife was Margaret Douglas, the daughter of a substantial and well-connected Fife laird who had sat in the old Parliament. Again it was a short marriage. Smith senior died in January 1723, six months before the birth of his second son Adam. Margaret Smith never remarried, her husband had left her comfortably off. She spent most of her long life in Kirkcaldy among her family and friends. She devoted her life to her son Adam.
It was there that Adam Smith went to school and later went back for long vacations. His relationship with his mother was close. She treated him with an unlimited indulgence; but it produced no unf...
... middle of paper ...
...ealth. At this point, the nature of morality will come into the place to regulate the wrongful behaviors that caused by the motive of morality. Motive of morality represented self-restriction and nature of morality represented the self-interest from individuals. These two components have special relationships that can restrict each other to prevent each of them going extreme; therefore, Smith used these theories to promote Lassie-faire in his book. "Smith quotes Lord Rochfaucault as having said "Love is commonly succeeded by ambition; but ambition is hardly ever succeeded by love" (Smith, 1759: 57). Smith then goes on to say that "all other pleasures sicken and decay" because of the passion for either material wealth or public recognition. It causes people to forget that there are other things in life outside of the internal drive for more power, wealth, and fame.
In the Humanistic Tradition the author, Gloria Fiero introduces Adam smith as a Scottish moral philosopher, pioneer of political economy, and a key figure in the Scottish Enlightenment. Smith also known as the Father of Political economy, is best known for one of his two classic works An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Fiero looks at Smith’s work because the division of labor is important. One thing Smith thinks is even more important for creating a wealthy nation, is to interact and have open trade with different countries. Fiero states,“It is necessary, though very slow and gradual, consequence of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter,
He talks about how Smiths strength and weaknesses had profound effects on Jamestown. What was an interesting fact about Smith, he actually arrived into the colony as a common prisoner and was still able to achieve a leadership role. Smith’s amazing creativity and knowledge in certain areas was what actually saved the colony from starvation and attacks. He gain support with his ability to deal with the native people. Price then goes into detail of describing the people that came here with John Smith. There were no women and the ships were not filled with many soldiers or hardworking men. Instead many of these men that came he with Smith were members of a class from England known as the Gentlemen. They relied on there their titles in life to make there selves wealthy. There main issue was they didn’t know the true value of hard work. This here set the platform for issues to arise. Coming to this new outpost, Smith failed to successfully lead these gentleman, and soon adopted the policy that of one does not work, does not eat. With this strong policy, along with his abilities in addressing, leadership, and organization, he was able to avoid massive failure in
The early lives of John Adams and John Quincy Adams are different. John Adams?s father, who also named John, sent his son ? young Adams to Harvard College at age fifteen, and he expected him to become a minister. His father was working hard to make young Adams?s life different than his own which was to become an educated person. However, John Adams did not want to become a minister. After he graduated in 1755, he taught school for few years in Worcester, and that allowed him to think about his career choice. After much reflection, he decided to become a lawyer, and studied law in the office of James Putnam, a prominent lawyer in Worcester. In 1758, he was admitted to the bar. He put the skill to good use as a lawyer, often recording cases he observed so that he could study and reflect upon them. His report of the 1761 argument of James Otis in the superior court of Massachusetts as to the legality of Writs of Assistance is a good example. On the other hand, John Quincy?s father which is John Adams did not push him to become a minister. Moreover, John Adams brought young Adams to France (1778 ? 1779) and to the Netherlands (1780 ? 1782) to acquire his early education at institutions at the University of Leiden. John Adams let his son explored the world more than his own father did. At age fourteen, young Adams accompanied Francis Dana on a mission to St. Petersburg, Russia, to gain recognition to the new republic. He also spent time in Finland, Sweden, Den...
Smith, Adam. 1981 [1776]. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Press.
Why do you go to school? Why do you want to get good grades? Why do you want to have a good work? There are a lot of reasons, but it seems that the most accurate is because you are self-interested. (source) Being self-interested indicates that you care of your own personal achievements. In words of Adam Smith in his book “The Economic Lowdown”: “It is not from the benevolence (kindness) of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner but from their regard to their own interest.” In other words, why does the baker makes bread? The most straight forward answer is because of self-interest. The baker wants to get enough money to feed his family, to pay the rent, and most probably to get car and the easiest way for him to get this money is to bake bread for everybody.
In Jonathan Edwards's The Nature of True Virtue his beliefs of following God's supremacy leads to moral beauty, the virtue in nature, and the selflessness of true virtue will unite society all stem from John Locke's beliefs of the social contract, Isaac Newton's belief of the logical perfection of nature, and both of their beliefs of human morality.
"Adam Smith." Adam Smith. Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008. Web. 4 Feb. 2011. .
John Adams was born on October 30th, 1735 to John Adams Sr. and Susanna Boylston Adams. He was the oldest of three and lived in Braintree, Massachusetts. His father was a farmer, deacon, and town councilman. The Adams were not very wealthy and John Adams’ father knew he could only send one son and he wanted to send his eldest. However, John Adams told his father “I do not love books and I wish you would lay aside thoughts of sending me to college.” His father in reply asked him- “What would you do child? Be a farmer?” John insisted that he wanted to be a farmer and not a scholar. His father brought him to work the fields the next day. Farming was strenuous work and was most likely rough on John’s hands and back. The night after the long day of farming, His father questioned him “Well John are you satisfied with being a farmer.” John Adams refused to admit that his father was right but John Adams Sr said “I do not like it[farming] so well, so you shall go to school.” John Adams and his father found a compromise- John would go to a tutor that challenged his students instead of the town teacher that was unbearably easy. Adams excelled under the tutors teaching and was accepted to Harvard in 1751.
John Smith was born in Lincolnshire, England sometime between 1579 to 1580 (Biography.com pg 1). John Smith was a man of many talents. When he was still a young boy he was apprenticed to a merchant (shmoop pg 1). His father died when Smith was just seventeen. Soon after his father’s death he became a soldier for hire in the English army, also known as “red coats,” and became surprisingly successful in his military career (biography.com pg 1). During his time in the English army, he was captured by the Turks and was taken prisoner (biography.com pg 1). Not long after being imprisoned he became a slave and killed his master because of the cruel treatment he received (biography.com pg 1). He escaped and returned to England in the early 1600s. After that, he became a sailor, an explorer and, a settler in the New World, and a writer in his later years (Mark Canada pg 1). But out of all these things he was best known for establishing “Jamestown,” and in doing so, setting a foundation for The United States of America. One of John Smith’s main reasons for coming to the New World included a taste for an adventure, but the real main reason was for money. By investing in the New World which he thought ...
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. Edwin Cannan. 1904 ed. London: Methuen, 1776. Library of Economics and Liberty. Web. 4 May 2014. .
outlined well in Adam Smith's own introduction. Smith wrote the book to explain how a
...rn day society, illusive ambitions can be incredibly detrimental, just as they are demonstrated to be in Macbeth. Ambitions, if they are untamed, can be an impediment to free will; they can overpower your good conscience, possibly leading you into causing death and destruction. They can also corrupt one’s mental health, while practically morphing that person’s perception of reality into something demonstrably wrong and twisted. Finally, they can boost ones ego to a point where that person is engulfed and imprisoned in the vehemence of their own denial, which can ultimately bear fatal consequences. If one’s hopes and desires are innately destructive, then it logically follows that that one’s ambition is also innately destructive; be wary of one with an immense ambition.
J.S. Mill’s principle of utility is explained as actions are right as they tend to gain happiness, and wrong as they tend to reduce happiness. Mill defines happiness as, “pleasure and the absence of happiness is pain.” He argues that pleasure can differ in quality and quantity, and that more complex pleasures are ranked higher. Mills also places people’s achievements of goals, such as a virtuous living, should be counted as part of their happiness. When Mill states that the principle of utility is the “First Principle” of morality he is ranking the principle of utility highest because that in order to know what the boundaries of morality are, it is necessary to know how actions should be accounted. The first principle dictates the rest of the principles of morality because it illuminates what the right thing to do is, and that is to maximize happiness. Happiness is the goal of morality, and this is why Mill believes that morality must have a first principle.
John Stuart Mill, in his Utilitarianism, turns morality into a practical problem. His moral theory is designed to help one evaluate his moral principles and senisibilites and be able to ajudicate conflictions in moral conflicts. Mill postulates that actions are right so far as they tend to promote happiness and minimize pain. This theory manifests itself as an impartial promotion of happiness. Morally "right" actions are ones which promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number number of people and reduce pain. Utilitarian moral theories need to be coupled with theories of well-being, so that we can point to what is being maximized through the moral theory's operation. Mill's moral theory is no different. Three theories of well-being must be considered, one of which fits Mill's moral theory most appropriately. Experientialism, or hedonism, is a theory of well-being that advocates an unwavering pursuit of pleasure through desireable experiences. The theory is a mental state account which stipulates that a person's life is going well insofar as they are having pleasurable experiences and what Experientialist call "desireable consciousness." We strive to have experiences in which we can arrive at the mental state of "desireable consciousness." The Desire Theory postulates that a person's life is going well to the extent that his desires are fulfilled, regardless of the content of those desires. There is no hierarchy of desires in this account; Desire Theorists see no difference between a desire to throw a piece of trash into a wastebasket yards away and desire to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Lastly is the Substantive Goods Theory which, when compared with the requirements and goa...
...llow the “invisible hand” to guide everyone in their economic endeavors, create the greatest good for the greatest number of people, and generate economic growth. Smith also delved into the dynamics of the labor market, wealth accumulation, and productivity growth. His work was later discovered to be precise, after the Great depression took place allowing the governments interference by reducing taxes and increasing governments spending.