Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of europeans on native americans
Importance of louisiana purchase
Perspective of the native americans and the europeans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of europeans on native americans
The Miami were not naïve to the European invaders. They had a long history of resistance of any domination, starting with the French. Pressure from the misplaced Iroquois in the East had moved many bands to the shores of Lake Michigan. In the middle seventeenth century, French traders and missionaries made contact with the Miami. By the end of the seventeenth century, the French openly traded with the Miami. The British victory over the French in the Seven Years’ War created a British presence in the Miami area and the tribes benefited from the British trade. Native Americans were seasonal warriors. With no supply structure, they were could only sustain themselves for short periods in battle and each warrior was responsible for individual supplies. Native Americans fought only a few days from any food source. Even in a coordinated battle, tribes fought for individual formations and independent victory. Victory meant inflicting more casualties and captured than the tribe fighting. The battle would continue only if the casualty count meant the enemy sustained greater losses. A council of leaders met prior to St. Clair’s arrival and decided the tactics of the battle. Maneuvering into a crescent shape formation prior to the attack, individual tribes had the advantage of surrounding the Americans. Knowing they could only be a few days away from a food supply and limited on the ability to form a large force, the Americans played into the hands of the Native Americans. The Indians had tested their tactics in centuries of war with one another and learned from the forty years of war against the British, French, and Americans when planning the attack against St. Clair. St. Clair’s army attempted to train during the travel and many ha... ... middle of paper ... ...n1 (accessed May 25, 2014). Roosevelt, Theodore. St. Clair's defeat. S.l.: Harper's, 1896. Print. Sargent, Winthrop . "Papers of the War Department." Papers of the War Department. http://wardepartmentpapers.org/docimage.php?id=5895&docColID=6385 (accessed March 14, 2014). Sonneborn, Liz. Chronology of American Indian history: the trail of the wind. New York: Facts on File, 2001. Print. Tebbel, John William. The Battle of Fallen Timbers, August 20, 1794; President Washington secures the Ohio Valley,. New York: F. Watts, 1972. "The Militia Act of 1792." The Militia Act of 1792. http://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm (accessed May 25, 2014). Winkler, John F., and Peter Dennis. Wabash 1791: St. Clair's defeat. Botley, Oxford: Osprey, 2011. Kindle edition. Yenne, Bill. Indian wars: the campaign for the American West. Yardley, Penn.: Westholme Publishing, 2006.
McMurtry, Larry. 2005. Oh What a Slaughter: Massacres in the American West: 1846-1890. 10th Ed. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Portland: Frank Cass & Company Limited, 1996. Middle Kauff, Robert. A.S.A. The Glorious Cause. The American Revolution, 1763-1789. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Braddock was appointed by King George III to lead an army against the French. Washington tried to convince Braddock that they would lose if they fought using the standard British field tactics that Braddock was accustomed to. Washington realized that since there were no open fields in the Ohio Valley, this style of battle would be unsuccessful. The Indians, who sided with the French, because they thought that the British would lose the war, fought using guerilla warfare. Braddock did not listen to Washington and the English were badly defeated.
“ [They] spent most of the conquest and colonial periods reacting and responding to the European strangers and invaders” (99). Both sides were different in many ways; Their communication, transportation, culture, and the way they survived differentiate the Europeans from the Native Americans. They both acted as wisely as they could when this encounters began after the discovery. “[Tribes] worked mightily and often cleverly to maximize their political sovereignty, cultural autonomy, territorial integrity, power of self identification, and physical nobility” (100). The Europeans were stronger, had better technology, better weapons, and had plenty of experience fighting people like the Native Americans. They could have easily conquer them , but they had a problem of resources, reinforcements and survival. Native American were many but they lacked the knowledge and experience of war and evolution. Europeans were technologically evolved and were experienced at fighting wars, but they ...
Many suspect that they were with Washington only to maximize the hate on both sides of the battle. They went against Washington’s orders to not be the aggressors. Soon large units of British and American soldiers were sent to settle what should have been small battles. The French however were prepared to fight back and even had the Indians as allies to help with upcoming battles. In July, Braddock’s army which consisted of over 2000 British soldiers rode west with George Washington and came upon 250 plus French soldiers with over 600 Indians allies. Nearly 1000 British were killed, unlike George Washington who was unhurt during the battle was soon promoted to commander of the Virginia army for his bravery. (Roark 146)
Trafzer, Clifford E. "Book reviewsOnce they Moved Like the Wind: Cochise, Geronimo and the Apache wars by David Roberts" The Journal of American History. Vol 81 155.3 (Dec 1004)Pg 1328. History Study Center. ProQuest Company Addison Trail High School M>C>, Addison, IL. 29 Jan.2007http://www.historystudycenter.com/search/displayJournalpg
All in all, the treatment of the American Indian during the expansion westward was cruel and harsh. Thus, A Century of Dishonor conveys the truth about the frontier more so than the frontier thesis. Additionally, the common beliefs about the old west are founded in lies and deception. The despair that comes with knowing that people will continue to believe in these false ideas is epitomized by Terrell’s statement, “Perhaps nothing will ever penetrate the haze of puerile romance with which writers unfaithful to their profession and to themselves have surrounded the westerner who made a living in the saddle” (Terrell 182).
Stark, H. K., & Wilkins, D. E. (2011). American Indian Politics and the American Political System. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
George Browm Tindall, David Emory Shi. American History: 5th Brief edition, W. W. Norton & Company; November 1999
Not many know about Dragging Canoe and the battle he fought during the American Revolutionary War. The Native American’s role in the Revolutionary War was very important, but not well known. As a result, the Revolutionary War can come across as one-sided. Dragging Canoe fought for the Native American’s existence in the colonies. First, he was strongly opposed to Henderson’s Purchase or also called the Transylvania Purchase. Secondly, Dragging Canoe’s raid at “Battle of the Bluffs” became an issue for the colonists. And lastly, there was negotiating done between the British and Colonists would somehow effect Dragging Canoe, his warriors, and the future for the Native Americans.
7. Starr, Emmet. History of the Cherokee Indians and Their Legends and Folk Lore. Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Pub., 2003. Print.
Although the work is 40 years old, “Custer Died for Your Sins” is still relevant and valuable in explaining the history and problems that Indians face in the United States. Deloria book reveals the Whites view of Indians as false compared to the reality of how Indians are in real life. The forceful intrusion of the U.S. Government and Christian missionaries have had the most oppressing and damaging effect on Indians. There is hope in Delorias words though. He believes that as more tribes become more politically active and capable, they will be able to become more economically independent for future generations. He feels much hope in the 1960’s generation of college age Indians returning to take ownership of their tribes problems.
In the article review “ How the West was Lost” the author, William T. Hagan explains that in a brief thirty-eight year period between 1848 and 1886, the Indians of the Western United States lost their fight with the United States to keep their lands. While nothing in the article tells us who Hagan is, or when the article was written, his central theme of the article is to inform us of how the Indians lost their lands to the white settlers. I found three main ideas in the article that I feel that Hagan was trying to get across to us. Hagan put these events geographically and chronologically in order first by Plains Indians, then by the Western Indians.
Although the work is 40 years old, “Custer Died for Your Sins” is still relevant and valuable in explaining the history and problems that Indians face in the United States. Deloria’s book reveals the White view of Indians as false compared to the reality of how Indians are in real life. The forceful intrusion of the U.S. Government and Christian missionaries have had the most oppressing and damaging affect on Indians. There is hope in Delorias words though. He believes that as more tribes become more politically active and capable, they will be able to become more economically independent for future generations. He feels much hope in the 1960’s generation of college age Indians returning to take ownership of their tribes problems and build a better future for their children.
6. Ward Christopher, The War of the Revolution Volume Two, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1952