Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assessment strategies in language learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Assessment strategies in language learning
There are many issues of assessment: cultural and linguistic bias, political, social, and psychological factors, special programs testing including gifted and talented, special education and English as a Second Language (ESL), the importance of standards and the difference between language proficiency and other types of assessment such as standardized achievement tests of overall mastery, as they affect ESL student learning (Cohen, 1997).
The state of Texas is currently going through an assessment period in which it tests the English language proficiency of its students who have been identified as limited English proficient (LEP) using the Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment Standards (TELPAS) assessment (TEA, 2012). The TELPAS is a very subjective test when it comes to speaking and listening. The writing can also be described this way because sometimes teachers get caught up in comparing their TELPAS writing samples to other student writing samples. TELPAS measure language proficiency which ESL teachers understand but non-ESL teachers at the district need to keep in mind that they are grading according to a rubric for ESL students, not academic English and that their score should reflect those standards. Non-ESL teachers often need additional training in teaching literature; nurturing reading, writing, and thinking skills; and organizing for success in a way that English language learners can understand (Burke, 2008). Again, they cannot use these academic skill measures during the TELPAS assessment.
Our district is comprised of over 70 percent non-native English speakers. Therefore, it is necessary that in addition to our regular standardized assessments, we administer the Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment S...
... middle of paper ...
...en, how eligibility is determined, what level their child has currently tested and how to exit their child from the program(s). Parents also have the appeal process thoroughly explained as it is their right to be informed about any decisions made regarding their child. The parent’s approval is required only once for entry into the program and is valid until the parent withdraws consent, the student is exited from the program or the student graduates from the high school.
It is vital that these assessments continue to go through a revision period as educators tend to incorrectly believe that simply because a test has been standardized that it is somehow a thorough assessment for English language and academic growth (Cohen, 1997). It is through periodic reviews of the assessments that we ensure that our students are receiving the best tools for their academic success.
Every year students in each grade level are required to take standardized testing to determine their level of competency in the course. The schools use it as a tool for passing students to the next grade level and ensuring they have been taught adequately. The Texas Education Agency or TEA supplies and monitors these tests given to students each year. According to the results received this past year, in 2013, 35 schools out of 456 campuses in Texas performed poorly on the STAAR test. The 35 campuses belongs to Dallas Independent School District which is 8% of the total and more than half of Houston’s sc...
The Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills, otherwise known as the TAKS, is a standardized test used throughout the state of Texas to determine whether or not a student is prepared for the next grade level. The TAKS test was implemented in 2003 to replace the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills in concurrence with the “No Child Left Behind Act”. The new test added science and social studies portions to the already existing sections of math, reading, and English. The purpose of this was to obtain more information on where students are academically. However, since its inception, the test has been criticized for numerous reasons. The TAKS test has become ineffective in several capacities and has been used to determine teacher bonuses and assessment of how well a teacher is communicating, evaluations that it was not originally intended to decide. When taking into account all of these points of view, I have come to the conclusion that the TAKS test should no longer be used in its present function.
One problem with standardized testing is that it narrows curricula to what the tests assess. Since the tests focus on math and reading, educators often overlook other core areas. There are eight different types of learning that educators recognize in students. These include math/logic, linguistic, visual/spatial, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic, musical, and kinesthetic. Standardized tests used in schools only test math/logic and linguistic skills, so students who are strong...
The Running Records assignment from Developing Lang and Literacy class at Leeward Community College provides evidence that I have completed the HTSB Standard 6: Assessment. For this assignment, I volunteered for ten hours in an elementary school and performed the running records assessment on a student. The point of the running records assessment is to determine students’ level of proficiency with literacy materials. This is done by checking if students self-corrected themselves, and if they can recognize and gather meaning from the text, not just decode it.
...i, Jamal, and Ron Dietel. "Challenges in the No Child Left Behind Act for English-Language." Weber.edu. Phi Delta Kappan, June 2004. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.
“More than half of public school students in New York City failed their English exams,” (Medina). There are so many students that are continuously failing these exams and being held back from the next grade level or from graduating high school. These exams are doing more harm than good since students are failing to actually learn information. The students are so worried about passing the exams that they just try to re...
..., K., Milczarski, E., & Raby, C. (2011). The Assessment of English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities: Issues, Concerns, and Implications. Education, 131(4), 732-739.
Standardized testing is an unfair and inaccurate form of judging a person’s intellect. In many cases, people are either over- or underrepresented by their test scores, partly because America does not currently have the capabilities of fairly scoring the increasing number of tests. Additionally, many students today are not native English speakers, and their capabilities could be grossly underestimated by these types of exams. Although President Bush is a supporter, many influential people are against this bill, including the largest teacher’s union in the United States, which has formed a commission in opposition to the President’s proposal.
The importance of this evaluation is that it will ascertain if it is true that TBE is a successful program in assisting native and second language literacy skills. The study by De Ramírez and Shapiro...
How well do standardized tests work as tools for obtaining information about children’s literacy strengths and needs? Standardized tests have both positive and negative uses as they pertain to obtaining information and what that information can be used for. The use of portfolios can also be used to guide instruction, and they can be used as informal or summative assessments. The use of both the standardized test as well as a student portfolio will give the teacher information that can be used to assess how well they are instructing as well as what areas they may still need more work in.
The purpose of this assignment is to explain the impact of English language learners in the classroom. As a foreign student, English language learner in the United States faces multiple challenges for achieving academic success. To successfully complete a task, they need to master both English as a language and how it is used in core content classes especially when they are an adult. When trying to assist in instructing English language learners, they usually have many concepts and language abilities that they need to master, as do the teachers that are trying to teach them. With the incorporation of the concepts and approaches to identify and assess the issues and concerns that we have learned in our classroom instruction, such as lesson preparation,
With the pressures of state testing and the College and Career Readiness Performance Index, our school’s Better Seeking Team examined what we could do to increase student achievement. During our investigation, we realized our students in grades three and five were not doing well in the literacy area, specifically with their Lexile scores. First of all, Lexile was not something we knew much about because our school had always used grade equivalency, not Lexile to measure students’ reading ability. This curriculum-based issue would need more concentration, not just for our students but for our teachers as well. Secondly, we realized the impact these Lexile scores had on our students’ overall GA Milestones scores. After all, it is the Lexile score
The ability to test a student’s language skills is essential to have as a teacher. Over the years, classrooms have become much more diverse with a wide variety of impairments being presented on a daily basis. Often, these disabilities contain a language impairment that appears as a side effect of the main disability. Unfortunately, assessing language is not as easy as one may think because it is not clearly defined and understood. Kuder (2008) writes that “…language is not a unitary phenomenon- it is ‘multidimensional, complex, and dynamic; it involves many interrelated processes and abilities; and it changes from situation to situation” (pg. 274). Language also develops at different times for different individuals, thus making language assessment an even harder task for test administrators to grade and evaluate. In order to further understand the language impairment that students present, teachers need to be aware of appropriate language tests that could be administered. In order to assure that the best language test is being issued to a student, several various tests exist to choose from. To test a student’s overall language capability, a comprehensive language test, such as the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL) or the Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS), could be administered. If a teacher wanted to test a specific language skill such as pragmatics, phonology, syntax, or semantics, the teacher would need to find the best test for the student’s unique situation.
Assessments were not aligned and incongruent with what was happening in the classroom. It was difficult to accurately measure student success (Polikoff, Porter, & Smithson, 2011). One of the greatest contributors to the difficulty of aligning assessments to standards is that the standards are so complex (LaMarca, 2001.) How can a single assessment demonstrate mastery of so much content? Also, some assessments items measure multiple standards. This can be difficult to analyze. Furthermore, some assessment contain content that is neither developmentally appropriate for the intended audience or it may content that is not mentioned in the standards (Polikoff, Porter, & Smithson, 2011). This can be discouraging and frustrating for both students and
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a