Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise and fall of dynasties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rise and fall of dynasties
Ghanghis Khan and Timur were two rulers that came from the same reigion. They both most likely had Turkic descent and had spoken Turkic language. Their rise to power was similar and they had united tribes in order to conquer lands. To unite tribes would mean that a person needed to be an effective speaker and both of them persusavive skills. They are both self-made men and military geniuses. They knew how to pit people aginast one another to their advantage. They knew how to fight even when outnumbered and the odds against them. Their conquests made in their respective time periods have influence many world events and continues to shape the politics of Central Asia and beyond. Their legacies are something that are talked about today as military leaders around the world have studied their technique. They have many similarities but have more differences. The way they ruled differiented. The enviornments that Gheghis and Timur had come out of were different. Ghenghis Khan was a nomad and his army reflected that and Timur had come out of the urban landscape. The treatment of enemies t...
The Aztec and Mongol empires were large, expansive realms that shared many similarities in their rise to power, but also had some differences. The Aztec and Mongol Empire's rise to power were similar politically in that they both conquered neighboring nations, similar socially in that their social structures both emphasized warriors, but were different economically in that the Aztecs relied on tributes from conquered lands to fund their expansion whereas the Mongols destroyed lands they conquered to prevent challenges to their power.
To start, the mongols were able to used brutal and strategic military tactics that helped them conquer more than 4,800,000 miles of land. The Mongols leader “Genghis Khan” was a very smart and strategic leader. He organized his army into groups of ten, hundred, and one thousand. If such groups runs away or flees, the entire group was put to death. Genghis Khans army was able to succeed in conquering land due to horses. His army
The Pax Mongolica, also known as the Mongol Peace and Pax Tatarica, was brought up at the end of the time of Mongols’ conquests. Western Scholars designated the fourteenth century as the Pax Mongolica. The Pax Mongolica contributed to the development of a new global culture because the Mongol Khans pursued peaceful trade and diplomacy (220). The bubonic plague epidemic of the 1300s led to the destruction of the Mongol Empire because of the deaths it caused; also, the plague had demoralized the living and deprived the Mongol Golden Family of its primary source of support by cutting off trade and tribute (247).
Both the glorious empires, the Mali established in 1230 by the founder Sundiata and Mongol founded by Genghis Khan in 1206 contain much more differences than similarities. When the rise of the Mali and Mongol Empires began to arise they had significant effects towards the areas in which they were located. Some similarities include religious tolerance and cultural growth by trade. Some differences include violence methods and religion. Even though both of these superlative empires arose in difference regions they shared some common views as well.
Weatherford, J. McIver. Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world. New York: Crown, 2004.
This document, "Giovanni de Plano Carpini: On the Mongols", was written by Giovanni de Plano Carpini, a Franciscan friar and Pope Innocent IV's ambassador to the Mongol Khan. This is a primary source and a historical account of what Kiev, Russia looked like six years after it was sacked by the Mongols. Giovanni de Plano Carpini describes the town as "reduced almost to nothing" and that the Mongols had "made great havoc, destroying cities and fortresses and slaughtering men" (Giovanni de Plano Carpini). Additionally, he talks about the Mongol's military strategy as they surround cities and use siege engines, not to mention their phycological warfare (Giovanni de Plano Carpini). Furthermore, it references how the Mongols searched for “experts,
Though the Mongols were brutal in their campaign to conquer, the conquests of Timur-i Lang were extremely harsh, much more so than that of the Mongols. He is heralded as one of the toughest rulers of the time, and he expanded the empire through harsh measures. Rather than the Mongols, who post-conquest were somewhat peaceful, Timur-i Lang was harmful to those he conquered in Asia. He slaughtered villages and burned them down. Most likely because of his rule and the vastness of the area he ruled, the Mongol empire was not united and failed to garner any big trading network that it previously had. Overall, Timur-i Lang was much more brutal than the rule of any other Mongol Khan, especially during the conquests and after the conquests. His zeal to get more land prevented any conquered peoples to live peacefully under his leadership.
Genghis Khan was born clutching a blood clot in his fist, foretelling of the bloodshed and violence he would unleash on the world while ultimately achieving the goal of creating the largest contiguous empire in history. His personal struggle is well outside the scope of this discussion. I will, however, cover how Genghis exemplified the qualities of a visionary leader by his use of technology, long range planning, and inspirational motivation. Contrary to historians in the Middle East, I also present that Genghis Khan was an ethical leader as shown by his authentic leadership style that embodied idealized influence and based his leadership decisions squarely on merit. Finally, I intend to convey how Genghis’ leadership example resonates with me and relates to my personal and professional decisions in life. To begin, we will explore how Genghis was a visionary leader.
To start there are their similarities. The biggest similarity of the two is that both empires survived into the 20th century while their other contemporaries did not. Secondly the two empires were alike in their strong armies. Their armies which were made strong most notably by their rulers, the Russian Peter the Great and the Ottoman Suleiman the Magnificent, and a further but related
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
In the West, Genghis Khan and the Mongol tribe are often presented as brutal savages who wiped out entire cultures, destroyed cities and killed many people. While these accounts are true, there was certainly more to the Mongol empire than sheer brutality. Many of the practices that Genghis Khan put into place were responsible for the successes of the Mongol Nation. With an ability to adapt and innovate, Genghis Khan became known as the world’s greatest conqueror and is still revered in many countries today. Temujin, who later took the name Genghis Khan, came from humble beginnings which helped to form the foundations of the type of leader he became later in life.
At its peak the Mongol Empire was praised with high esteem in Eurasia for its trade affluence. They built impactful infrastructure, for example, Genghis Khan utilized and expanded a postal system of alert horses and riders posted at stations staggered throughout the Mongol Empire to pass on important messages known as the Yam (New World Encyclopedia contributors). The postal stations developed into inns for merchants; riders and merchants interchanged ideas and prestige. This network benefitted Mongol advisors and merchants, furthermore, promoted rapid communication to safeguard and expedite Mongol society. Kublai Khan promoted economic growth and independence with neighboring empires by rebuilding and commissioning canals to update the Mongol
Alexander II has been considered “a great historical figure without being a great man, that what he did was more important than what he was.” ( W.E Mosse) For 26 years, Czar Alexander II ruled russia. During his reign, he made his mark on history by stepping outside of the box and going to extreme measures to help his people. He has been labeled as the “Liberator of tsar” for the ending of serfdom. Czar Alexander II of Russia has made an impact on history because of his interesting background, fatal assassination, and the changes made after his assassination.
Raised from humble beginnings, Temujin, later known as Genghis Khan, was a Mongol ruler and warlord. He ruled over the largest empire that has ever existed, and all of which he had conquered himself. He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of Northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire and being proclaimed "Genghis Khan", he started the Mongol invasions that resulted in the conquest of most of Eurasia. These included raids or invasions of the other dynasties. These campaigns were often accompanied by complete annihilations of the civilian populations. By the end of his life, the Mongol Empire occupied a substantial portion of Central Asia and China. As a result of his successes, his people began to refer to Temujin as
There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).