Zone Of Proximal Development: The Importance Of Reflection In Practice

1077 Words3 Pages

Recent developments show the importance of the reflection in practice. Many educational professionals have suggested definitions of ‘reflection’. Moon (1999) and Bolton (2010) concur that reflection is completed for a purpose, in order to achieve an intended outcome, as well as helping to develop an understanding of complex ideas and emotion by questioning how, why and what. Rolfe (2014) indicates that the disappointment of the success of reflective practice is not as a result of ideas discovered, but the way it which reflection has been ‘misunderstood, misinterpreted and misapplied.’ According to Stephen (2012) he reinforces that “theory helps to shape practice.” Therefore it can be considered that reflection is substantial to teaching as …show more content…

This could be changed by doing the task in ability groups and giving the lower ability groups definitive definitions until they can ‘scaffold’ Bruner (1978) learning, this established the three elements of metacognition and this supports Vygotsky’s (1978) notion of ‘zone of proximal development.’ Rutland defines that (1996) ‘The zone of proximal development is the difference between a child's actual level of development shown by unassisted performance, and his or her potential level as indicated by assisted performance.’ Following this it can be identified that this theory is applicable to the lesson as pupils would perform better with aids to scaffold their learning. I agree with the notion of scaffolding and zone of proximal development as it helps to build the overall confidence of the less able pupils by providing additional aids and resources. Once the pupil has grasped the concept slowly taking away aids and resources would not be as …show more content…

Gibbs has adapted Kolb’s cycle to reflect on the feelings and emotion, when reflecting on the lesson this was a key variable that was missed out. In critiquing my reflection I would ensure that in my hybrid model this stage was reflected upon. Furthermore Brookfield concurs the notion of the four lenses; pupils, colleagues, teacher and theoretical literature which is as a result of the reflection you see the task through their perspective. I should have implemented this theory into my reflection as it creates the ideological perspective through thoughts and feelings when requesting feedback on the experience. Gardner’s (2006) multiple intelligences suggests that pupils have a preferred way of learning and developing. Though it is important to establish that a lesson cannot cater for all the learning styles, I attempted to include as many as possible by using differentiation. Certainly it is imperative in practice to have knowledge of different learners and styles, therefore this theory is key to analysis and reflection of practice, furthermore creating explicit and implicit understanding about children’s learning and

Open Document