Yes Edward Snowden Is A Traitor Summary

760 Words2 Pages

The essay “ The Insufficiency of Honesty” by Stephen L. Carter discusses the definition of integrity and honesty and how they have different meanings. Carter argues that integrity is to stand up for the action rather than not doing anything for it and honesty is to trust others and be truthful to others. The article, “Yes, Edward Snowden Is a Traitor” by Zachary Keck, describes how Snowden is a traitor because he leaks out the information from the National Security Agency. However, he takes this step to show the public how government is spying on its people to prevent attacks, but he does not stand up for the consequences of his actions. Carter’s definition of integrity helps the readers to understand Keck’s arguments how Snowden does not …show more content…

Keck writes about how Snowden’s manner was wrong to reach out to the public in order to reveal the information from the NSA. Keck argues that Snowden should have first discussed with his co-workers in the NSA because they could have been seeing this spying on the people. The author writes, “In my view, a true whistleblower would have first pursued legal avenues for reining in the NSA, such as seeking out sympathetic members of congress. The American people, after all, elect people to serve in congress” …show more content…

Keck describes how Snowden fails to prove his reasons for leaking the information and take a flight to Hong Kong. The author writes, “Snowden’s flight to Hong Kong and then to Moscow showed he wasn’t willing to suffer the consequences for his actions, calling into question how much he believed in his cause” (Keck). Keck describes the quote how Snowden does not have confidence in himself to take his position in the society and give reasons for his actions. As Carter’s requirements of integrity, Kack proves how Snowden does not act on what is right, instead Snowden proves that he is not capable enough to face the society and give them response to their questions and doubt for his righteousness. If Snowden believed in his actions, he could’ve stayed in the United States to claim his perspective to the information that he has gathered. Therefore, he fails to complete the requirements of integrity and proves himself as a

Open Document