Year-Round School Argumentative Analysis

1367 Words3 Pages

Imagine going to school and not having a summer break. Year-round schooling allows students to go to school from six to nine weeks in a row followed by a two-to-four- week vacation. This way of schooling has been a controversial topic among parents and teachers worldwide. Schools should not have year-round schooling and should continue with the traditional schooling because of the absence of summer break, there is no academic benefit, and it is an inconvenience.
With year-round schooling comes no summer break. The article “Year Round School Advantages and Disadvantages” written by OccupyTheory in 2014 states, “Year-round school schedules will prevent high school students to get part time jobs or summer jobs since there wouldn’t be a long vacation” …show more content…

The article “The Impact of Year-Round Schooling on Academic Achievement” written by Steven McMullen and Kathryn E. Rouse in 2012 states, “According to one study, the research finds that a year-round calendar doesn't benefit the average student. Because these schools offer more breaks to make up for being in school year-round, students end up learning the same amount of material. Furthermore, the research found it isn't the amount of time that a student is in school, but rather the amount of learning that takes place” (McMullen & Rouse, 2012). The amount of time students are in school stays the same, the amount of material the students cover stays the same, and the amount of learning stays the same. This would lead to no academic benefit for the students to be in class year round. The students academics are not dependent on the time they are in school, it is how much they learn. The academics of the same student in both types of schooling would be the same. According to the article “Year-Round Schools: In Brief” written by Rebecca R. Skinner, a specialist in education policy for the Congressional Research Service, in 2014, “The research on the extent to which year-round schools affect student achievement has generally been found to be inconclusive and lacking in methodological rigor. There is some consensus that year-round schooling has no effect or a small positive effect on student performance” …show more content…

According to Patricia McCracken, who grew up attending a year-round school, in the article “The Pros and Cons of Year-Round Schools” written in 2015 by Scholastic, “It was really hard to get involved in the work because as soon as you geared up, you had to gear back down again” (Scholastic, 2015). The frequent breaks are disruptive to the motivation and learning students have. Once students start the six to nine week period of school, they feel it is over too quick and they do not have time to get back into the swing of things. The time allotted for school is too short to allow students to fully learn a concept or unit. When the unit may be coming to an end with a test in sight the students could have a break right before the test, which causes them to forget information that will be crucial to know for the test. There is no longer a exact date that all work must be finished, as the last day of school would be in a traditional school, which means the concepts must be fit within the breaks and could be rushed through in order to fit it in. Scholastic also writes that McCracken, whose mother taught at a traditional school said, “It meant my sister and I were basically latchkey kids for two or three years because it was impossible to find a babysitter for two weeks every six weeks” (Scholastic, 2015). With a year-round schedule, finding appropriate childcare can be a problem as well.

Open Document