Wrightson Microhistory

1304 Words3 Pages

Wrightson’s Methodology: Microhistory with a Focal Point It was through drawing particular attention towards the records left behind by a single individual of Newcastle-upon-Tyne that historian Keith Wrightson successfully managed to largely reconstruct a significant portion of microhistory while simultaneously continuing to maintain a central thread of focus. It is this central focus upon the records left behind by one Ralph Tailor that allowed Wrightson to begin his research in the first place, finally resulting in his well-written book aptly titled Ralph Tailor’s Summer: A Scrivener, His City and the Plague. Wrightson’s methodology allows for the evidence remaining from this particular period of history to be fully analysed, discussed and …show more content…

He also demonstrates the validity of constructing a microhistory around a particular focus upon an individual – and this deviates from most commonplace forms of writing microhistories. Throughout his book, Wrightson manages to challenge the idea of the Plague being truly as bleak as most of the pessimistic writings of the times suggest it as being. A complete abandonment of camaraderie, spurred by the fear inspired by the Plague, is often touted by such literature. Wrightson questions the validity of this vision of the Plague, at least of the one Ralph Tailor lived through. His conclusions are much less severe, and offer a brighter alternative than the one predominantly suggested – of a people, in some cases, united in a time of great need, and he cites several examples to support this. As has been previously discussed, a methodology involving the writing of a microhistory allows for many advantages when it comes to viewing evidence from a new perspective. To name one, it allows for readers to properly engage in an understanding of the everyday lives of the people involved by viewing them from a closer or more comprehensive perspective. Not only this, but in Wrightson’s case, it has allowed him to proceed from looking at a single individual to the city that surrounds that individual. As Rab Houston comments, “[Wrightson’s] approach is scholarly yet at the same time imaginative and deeply sympathetic”. Wrightson makes a bold yet effective approach with this work in many respects. This methodology’s usefulness and worth, then, cannot be underestimated, and is doubtlessly of great

Open Document