Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The decline of the American dream in the 1920s
The decline of the American dream in the 1920s
The decline of the American dream in the 1920s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The decline of the American dream in the 1920s
The idealized 19th century American Dream is a two-story house that housed two children, their parents, a cat, and a dog with a car or two sitting out front and dependable jobs for one or both parents. This lifestyle required a greater income for many families and as the second parent went to work it became apparent that a man trying to support his family alone in the 19th and 20th century could do so much more easily than a woman. Legislation was passed, movements occurred, women protested for equal pay, equal hours, equal opportunities. They succeeded. Yet, the question becomes were they successful enough? Is it enough to be legally able to get almost all the positions of a man even if not as many women are taking advantage of the opportunities? It is enough that women can achieve the career goals they wish without limitation if they have the drive to succeed? In the past women were limited in their career options, but in 21st century America this is not as it is only a woman’s capability that limits her career opportunity.
Lucy Stone's speech “Disappointment is the Lot of Women,” which she delivered in 1848, set the tone as the fight for woman’s rights was starting and women had very restricted rights. Stone made a logical argument that it was practical for women to have greater rights in employment. At this point in time women could only be teachers, seamstresses, and housekeepers and at best these jobs payed 14 cents a day which, accounting for inflation, is less than half the minimum wage per an hour today. (“CPI”) In her speech Stone uses a woman's wages being incapable to support a person to make the point, “Woman must marry for a home, and you men are the suffers by this; for a woman who loathes you may marry you becaus...
... middle of paper ...
...s.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb11-72.html>.
Stone, Lucy. "Disappointment Is the Lot of Women." Speech. Women's Rights Convention. Seneca Falls. 17 or 18 Oct. 1855. Bpi.org. Baltimore Polytechnic Institute. Web. 1 Mar. 2014. .
Taylor, Paul, Wendy Wang, and Kim Parker. "Breadwinner Moms." Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends. N.p., 29 May 2013. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. .
"Women in Construction." Safety and Health Topics. United States Department of Labor, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. .
"Women's Rights Timeline." Annenbergclassroom.org. Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014
.
Hollingsworth and Tyyska discuss the employment of women in their article, both wage work and work performed outside of the “paid labour force.” (14). They also look at work discrimination of women based on gender and marital status. They argue that disapproval of married women working for wages during the Depression was expressed not only by those in position of power, such as politicians, but also by the general public and labour unions. They suggest that the number of women in the workforce increased as more young wives stayed working until the birth of their first child and older women entered the workforce in response to depression based deprivation. Hollingsworth and Tyyska also give examples of work that married women did that was an extension of their domestic duties such as babysitting for working mothers or taking in laundry. They also state that some women took in boarders, sold extra produce from gardens, or ran make-shift restaurant operations out of their homes.
In the 1890s, female factory workers were seen as a serious economic and social threat. Because women generally worked at the bottom of the pay scale, the theory was that they depressed the overall pay scale for all workers (Kessler-Harris 98). Many solutions were suggested at this time that all revolved around the idea of these women getting marriedóthe idea being that a married woman would not work for wages. Although this idea seems ludicrous from a modern perspective, it should be noted that t...
In Antigone and Sister Carrie, all women work for men or stay at home with their children. Modernly speaking, women’s role in the workforce has dramatically increased, especially in terms of the number of women participating. According to the Census Bureau, “In terms of sheer numbers, women’s presence in the labor force has increased dramatically, from 30.3 million in 1970 to 72.7 million during 2006-2010.” Although women have worked their way into the workforce, women still face many different systemic struggles. One of the most recently talked about issues is the pay gap between men and women. Women make less money than men for doing the same
In “The Great Lawsuit”, Margaret Fuller tries to stop the great inequalities between men and women by describing great marriages where the husband and wife are equal, by stating how society constricts the women’s true inner genius, and by recording admirable women who stand up in an effort for equality. In her article, Fuller explains how the current society constricts women’s rights in an effort to show the inequalities between the men and women. For instance, she feels that “such woman as these, rich in genius, of most tender sympathies, and capable of high virtue, and a chastened harmony, ought not find themselves in a place so narrow” (Fuller 741). Margaret Fuller explains that all women, even those with “rich genius,” find themselves at a disadvantage because of the society’s inequality. She also feels that the women are just as “capable of high virtue” as the men, and do not deserve to be in “a place so narrow.”
In the 1920s, women struggled to develop a work identity that would give them professional status and preserve their femininity (Walkowitz, 1051). They wanted to be eligible for an executive position, but at the same time they also wanted to be Women finally began working outside the home, but not yet at the level, status, and rank they deserved. They deserved
Until the last hundred years or so in the United States, married women had to rely on their husbands for money, shelter, and food because they were not allowed to work. Though there were probably many men who believed their wives could “stand up to the challenge”, some men would not let their wives be independent, believing them to be of the “inferior” sex, which made them too incompetent to work “un-feminine” jobs. In the late 19th century and early 20th century, feminist writers began to vent their frustration at men’s condescension and sexist beliefs. Susan Glaspell’s “A Jury of Her Peers” and Zora Neale Hurson’s “Sweat” both use dialogue to express how women are capable of and used to working hard, thinking originally, being independent
Society has long since considered women the lessor gender and one of the most highly debated topics in society through the years has been that of women’s equality. The debates began over the meaning between a man and woman’s morality and a woman’s rights and obligations in society. After the 19th Amendment was sanctioned around 1920, the ball started rolling on women’s suffrage. Modern times have brought about the union of these causes, but due to the differences between the genetic makeup and socio demographics, the battle over women’s equality issue still continues to exist. While men have always held the covenant role of the dominant sex, it was only since the end of the 19th century that the movement for women’s equality and the entitlement of women have become more prevalent. “The general consensus at the time was that men were more capable of dealing with the competitive work world they now found themselves thrust into. Women, it was assumed, were unable to handle the pressures outside of the home. They couldn’t vote, were discourages from working, and were excluded from politics. Their duty to society was raising moral children, passing on the values that were unjustly thrust upon them as society began to modernize” (America’s Job Exchange, 2013). Although there have been many improvements in the changes of women’s equality towards the lives of women’s freedom and rights in society, some liberals believe that women have a journey to go before they receive total equality. After WWII, women continued to progress in there crusade towards receiving equality in many areas such as pay and education, discrimination in employment, reproductive rights and later was followed by not only white women but women from other nationalities ...
In the 1900’s women were thought of as if there only respectable job was that, at home cooking, cleaning and looking after the welfare of the family. It was unthinkable that they should be allowed to vote and work as l...
For several decades, most American women occupied a supportive, home oriented role within society, outside of the workplace. However, as the mid-twentieth century approached a gender role paradigm occurred. The sequence of the departure of men for war, the need to fill employment for a growing economy, a handful of critical legal cases, the Black Civil Rights movement seen and heard around the nation, all greatly influenced and demanded social change for human and women’s rights. This momentous period began a social movement known as feminism and introduced a coin phrase known in and outside of the workplace as the “wage-gap.”
Kuttner also agrees, “a lot of ugly realities were concealed by “traditional values”; the legal and economic emancipation of women was long overdue, and the task now is to reconcile gender equality with the healthy raising of the next generation.” (124). Before the 1890s, females had no other options but to live with their parents before marriage and with their husband after marriage. They couldn’t work and if they did, their wages were way lower than men.
The average woman gets paid 77 cents to every dollar that a man with the same job gets paid (Still A Man’s Labor Market). This can be attributed to the affects of discrimination since childhood, including discrimination by the enforcement of societal norms at home, discrimination in education, and finally discrimination in the labor market. All of this labor related discrimination affects women later in life as to whether they have as good of opportunities as others, experience poverty, obtain a secure retirement, and whether single mothers can provide well enough for their children.
Ever since the women’s suffrage movement of the 1920s, there has been a push for eliminating sexism and providing equality between men and women, especially in the workplace. The United States, along with most of the world, has made great strides in gender equality since then. Women can vote, and have careers, and men are able to stay home with the children if they choose to. But are the sexes really equal now? There are three common answers to this question. Some say yes, while the most common answer is no. The debate does not end there, however. It is typically assumed gender inequality is oppressing women and limiting their rights. Regardless, there are those who say the system is harming men instead. So, if gender inequality still exists,
During the Great War and the huge amount of men that were deployed created the need to employ women in hospitals, factories, and offices. When the war ended the women would return home or do more traditional jobs such as teaching or shop work. “Also in the 1920s the number of women working raised by fifty percent.” They usually didn’t work if they were married because they were still sticking to the role of being stay at home moms while the husband worked and took care of the family financially. But among the single women there was a huge increase in employment. “Women were still not getting payed near as equally as men and were expected to quit their jobs if they married or pregnant.” Although women were still not getting payed as equally it was still a huge change for the women's
Before the Feminist movement, women were stay at home moms and rarely left the house. They were not independent at all. Times have changed and women are now as strong and independent as men. It brought women out of the household, and into the workforce, changing the economy greatly. On the other hand, there are still anti-feminist, such as Phyllis Schlafly, who believe women don’t need equal pay, that they should be dependent on men. She recently argued, “Another fact is the influence of hypergamy, which means that women typically choose a mate (husband or boyfriend) who earns more than she does. Men don 't have the same preference for a higher-earning mate. ... Suppose the pay gap between men and women were magically eliminated. If that happened, simple arithmetic suggests that half of women would be unable to find what they regard as a suitable mate”,
Among the unjust treatments in a workplace, the one most heard of is unequal pay. Women are being paid less than men despite having the same job and producing the same result. In a research led by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, it states that “in 2014, female full-time worker made only 79 cents for every dollar earned by men, a gender wage gap of 21 percent” and there won’t be equal pay between genders until 2059 or 44 years later (“Pay Equity”). In history, women were not allowed to work and their job were to be full time housewives. As time passed, women started realizing that they are able to go out into the work force and they have the ability just as men do. Women fought for the right to work and they received what they wanted but their salary was different from what was given to men. They were discriminated because of their gender and women were treated unfairly simply just because they were